Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice
There is in the US inventory no other long-range maritime patrol and stand-off attack aircraft.

If anyone knows, why couldn't C-130s be used for this role? They have to have the carrying capacity and range needed and I don't think we necessarily are talking about something outside of their performance envelope otherwise. So why not? If they need greater speed why not consider the C-17?

Wasn't there just a stink becuase the C-130 line was going to be shut down? Well, extend production and modify them for this role.

I'm sure there's a reason this won't work, but I can't see it.

11 posted on 01/28/2005 9:05:56 AM PST by Phsstpok ("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
If anyone knows, why couldn't C-130s be used for this role?

I was wondering the same thing. Seems to me that C-130's are used in some roles that might be similar to what the Navy needs (e.g. maritime search and rescue work with the U. S. Coast Guard, and weather recon with the Air Force). So couldn't the C-130 be adapted for Navy use?

14 posted on 01/28/2005 9:28:26 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Phsstpok

I agree. Lockheed should have put forth the C-130 as its proposal against the B-737 put up by Boeing. It would require some modification (installing a bomb bay would be the main modification).


16 posted on 01/28/2005 9:40:18 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson