Posted on 02/01/2005 6:16:28 AM PST by TIElniff
The IRS can ruin you until the courts step in. That's why we need the National Sales Tax.
Well, my wife is already preparing for that by buying everything and anything so when we have a sales tax we won't need anything :)
ping
And the IRS will care? I think not. The IRS is the American equivalent of the KGD, NKVD, SAVAK and all the other secret police orgaizations in tryannical nations. The only way to bring them to heel is to shut it down, Like that will ever happen
And the IRS will care? I think not. The IRS is the American equivalent of the KGD, NKVD, SAVAK and all the other secret police orgaizations in tryannical nations. The only way to bring them to heel is to shut it down, Like that will ever happen
Big tax planning tip - don't annoy the IRS! No matter what the court case suggests, cooperation can get better results when facing an audit. You throw out all chance of negotiation or reduction of penalties by being obstructive.
Believe me, it's a heck of a lot cheaper just to pay them than to pay an attorney!
Right now, this ruling only applies to the 2nd Circuit. Other circuits may have differing views on this issue, or they may have never decided this issue. Until and unless SCOTUS grants cert. for this case, this decision is only binding in the 2nd Circuit.
'bout time!
If you are at the stage where the IRS is trying to seize property you are in deep sh@t. Making it go through one more step is not going to be your salvation.
Nothing like wild hysterical miscatagorization to make your case. THAT will win you loads of adherents I'm sure.
That leg is about as strong as that of a jellyfish's tentacles.
Yup, I'm gonna take WND's tax advice. I'm gonna like living in a dumpster after I get out of "club fed."
LOL!!!! That laugh did me so much good! :o)
d@mn! Maybe this will be the first real step in dismantelling the IRS...
It was a serious determination by the court, not nonsense. From what I understand, the ruling by its nature, nullifed the part of the tax code that says the IRS alone has the authority to demand a judge issue an attachment warrant for someone who fails to respond to the IRS' summons. So, instead of the IRS being able to demand you respond to a summons under IRS authority, without having to show reason, the IRS must now seek a federal court order to compel compliance with a summons, which presumably would mean the agency would have to show reason for the summons.
Interesting to say the least...and it really gets folks jacked up about tax reform!
The threat of prison from an agency that has been provided with its own court system is frightening, to say the least.
That's what I'm thinking, too.
You can bet, if this report is accurate, that the IRS will appeal all the way up the line. Power is more addictive than herion.
The IRS, which won that round against Schulz after all, is now asking the court to amend its ruling, for the very reason that the court's language empowered Schulz and WND to go boasting. The IRS quoted this WorldNetDaily article in their response. This proves that they think: "The fair and effective administration and enforcement of our tax laws may thereby be significantly impaired" (USA Attorney Cihlar in the motion).
Schulz replied by asking the court instead to amend even more strongly in favor of his own point: to declare IRC enforcement section 7604(b) null and void! Watch for WND to post additional articles on this (free self-coverage).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.