Posted on 02/02/2005 12:17:07 PM PST by NYer
Yes you're right. And I would care for a lesbian couple's children with no problem. But I would not hide my beliefs from the kids, so I doubt they would find ME acceptable. I'm not saying I would set out to insult the children's legal guardians, but when I care for children, I see it as my responsibility to teach them about right and wrong. I also read books and provide other Christian based material for them. I suppose it would be easier to avoid if they were the only children I cared for (still it would come up), but I certainly wouldn't sacrifice the proper training of other children for the sake of the immoral "moms." They wouldn't want me as a babysitter, but I wouldn't mind doing it.
Most recently, I have been honoured by being granted an Award of Merit by the new Sexual Diversity Studies Department at the University of Toronto, in recognition of my advocacy on behalf of queer communities in Canada.
Surprise, surprise ...
As hard as it might be for your to get your mind around this, I'm not white.
This is about the freedom of people to associate with anyone they choose, I don't want to tell anyone else who they can and cannot assoicate with, and I would appreciate the same from them.
Oh, and I thought I didn't capitalize my name most of the time because I was lazy. Instead I'm making a statement. Cool!
sundero
Likewise I certainly wouldn't want them to babysit my child.
exactly, the article said it was a hall behind a church-"what is the name of the church?"
I'm sure it was obvious it was a Catholic Church.
They're not Bruces (although some of them want to be).
They're sure no Sheilas (I've seen some of them).
That leaves Poofters.
funny how the rights of homos are becoming more important that the rights of straight people* it is like our rights are a lesser right*
i do not like using periods*
It's so "I'm a rebel, look at me!!" ish it's not even funny.
I know exactly what she means: I like to leave the zipper down on my pants...
'I realized that I had a perfect illustration of how we react when someone moves even a tiny bit away from the norm,'
'I know exactly what she means: I like to leave the zipper down on my pants...'
Well, my son already does this. He gets your attention quick.
GALAHAD: Well, look, I-I-uh--
ZOOT: What is your name, handsome knight?
GALAHAD: Sir Galahad... the Chaste.
ZOOT: Mine is Zoot... just Zoot.
ATTENTION CANADIAN PROVINCES WITH SOME NOTION OF SANITY:
ABANDON CANADA TO ITS SELF IMPOSED DOOM AND JOIN THE USA AS A STATE:
http://www.unitednorthamerica.org
END YOUR CANAIDAN HUMILIATION!
The point I was making (attempting to make) had nothing to do with your particular ethnicity.
No, your simply assumed that any one who's against anti-discrimination laws must be a white-supremacist.
Oh, I get it. They weren't thinking!
They were thinking of dollars and notoriety.
Maybe this could be solved by just informing the lesbian couple that the children will be taught Judeo/Christian moral values.
HAS THE 'MARRIAGE' ALREADY TAKEN PLACE??
If not, someone contact the Knights and suggest they 'decorate' the hall with religious posters, paintings, statues, etc. Then see how happy the 'couple' is to broadcast their great sin under the eyes of Mary and the Saints and a few Popes.
The sexual alternativists need to back down and rethink their strategies and behavior. The in-your-face maneuver is getting a bit silly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.