Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21
SierraTimes.com ^ | Feb 3, 2005 | Nancy Levant

Posted on 02/03/2005 10:37:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-795 next last
To: CyberAnt
It's no joke. Read some of the following. America is in big trouble.
121 posted on 02/04/2005 12:59:42 AM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

And you're welcome.

On the Protocols, that is being republished around what were once ground tactical gateways to Russia over the past few years. We hope to reverse that ugly process and talk them out of anti-Semitism soon.


122 posted on 02/04/2005 1:00:06 AM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
"can't even carry off a 2nd rate kickback scheme"

"can't even get bribery right "

OH, they DIDN'T succeed? You are not intellectually challenged not to understand the concept of world domination either by, "consent or conquest." Foreign armies are to feared, so is the polition bent on power. No this isn't the 1990's but when did the UN care what date it implements supra-national agreements? You are bemoaning FReepers who raise alarm beels to this. Remember, ‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’

123 posted on 02/04/2005 1:00:34 AM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot

I remember right before the Nov. elections the woman who was responsible for taking away the guns in Canada and I believe Australia and maybe Ireland, was having a conference here in America talking about gun control, about getting rid of our second amendment.


124 posted on 02/04/2005 1:03:34 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
It's a changing of the guard. The UN Marxists are on the outs. Time for some business interests to make the plays.
125 posted on 02/04/2005 1:04:05 AM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Protect U.S. Sovereignty: Sink the Law of the Sea Treaty
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1331018/posts

Lugar, Rice, & Others Pushing For Law Of the Sea Treaty (LOST) Passage
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1329399/posts

Sovereignty-sapping U.N. Accord gets new Life
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1328002/posts


126 posted on 02/04/2005 1:04:46 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
Google has 20,800,000 links with information on Agenda 21. It's not a joke.
127 posted on 02/04/2005 1:06:23 AM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

I don't think most people are looking for what is going on behind our backs by the UN. However, sometimes they are right out in the open with it and no one is the wiser. Example, November 21, 2004, 21 nations held a conference in South America. They didn't call it agenda 21 but you can bet your bottom dollar that is what it was.


128 posted on 02/04/2005 1:07:20 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

ping


129 posted on 02/04/2005 1:08:13 AM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

yes, those things you mentioned i don;t like either. but they are just words... so far or nothing really big -yet. has he done anything that would make you think he is the Rockefeller type? i can see W actually playing the UN ... hope it's not just wishful thinking..


130 posted on 02/04/2005 1:09:31 AM PST by sdpatriot ("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
President Bush is one of those who agree with the treaty....that's scary.

Thanks for the info. I have this thread bookmarked. This subject needs to be brought out in the open for all to see.

131 posted on 02/04/2005 1:10:30 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
Example, November 21, 2004, 21 nations held a conference in South America. They didn't call it agenda 21 but you can bet your bottom dollar that is what it was.

I never made that connection. Thanks for pointing it out.

132 posted on 02/04/2005 1:12:03 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: struggle

I wasn't too worried either until I heard he's pushing the L.O.S.T. treaty...

Something doesn't add up.


133 posted on 02/04/2005 1:14:18 AM PST by yer gonna put yer eye out (Gettin' a PhD (Prettyhard on Democrats) at FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
I'm sorry, but our national story doesn't end with us as UN chattel. We've beaten far worse then that bunch of dopes.

Really? How have we beaten the UN?

What precisely have we done to beat them?

What are the signs of our 'victory'?

Please don't merely express your opinion. Anyone, especially a swabbie can tell a great sea tale.

I want you to provide the proof to back up your claims.

134 posted on 02/04/2005 1:16:12 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: All
Isn't it koffee annus who wants to put restrictions on what can be put out over the internet?

If you can google, and get more than 20 million hits on Agenda 21, maybe that's just one of his reasons. Subjects like the one we are discussing will be prohibited.

135 posted on 02/04/2005 1:16:16 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

i've heard this before... and i called my dem senator Tim Johnson last fall when they tried sneaking LOST through. he also claimed Bush was for it. i asked him how he knew that.... and he had no answer... he had just heard it. is there a quote where Bush said he is for LOST?


136 posted on 02/04/2005 1:17:20 AM PST by sdpatriot ("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

Sorry about that last post. I thought you were being sarcastic. The Liberty Bell is owned by the city of Philadelphia.


137 posted on 02/04/2005 1:18:18 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
In the meantime, here's a little tidbit for you to chew on.

UNESCO World Heritage Sites - Everglades National Park:

Threats to the Site:

The site was inscribed on the List of the World Heritage in Danger in 1993 after the park's Superintendent informed the Committee of extensive damage to Everglades' ecology due to a number of causes including nearby urban growth, pollution from fertilisers, mercury poisoning of fish and wildlife, and a fall in water levels caused by flood protection measures. In addition, on 24 August 1992, Hurricane Andrew altered much of Florida Bay and its ecological systems and destroyed the park's visitor centre.

The inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger led to an increased federal funding for the restoration of the site. A major rehabilitation effort is currently underway with $US 8 million budgeted for ecosystem research. This is the largest budget allocation ever voted for research in a park in any part of the world. Legal actions and negotiations were undertaken to reduce pollution by fertiliser, an addition of 107,000 acres has been incorporated to protect the north- eastern part of the Park and structural changes in the water management system have been undertaken to restore the water level in this area.

As of 1998, US$ 26 million worth of land purchases have been completed in the East Everglades Expansion Area; an additional US$ 40 million are needed to finalise the total of 109,000 acres of additional land purchases foreseen as part of the program to expand the total extent of the Everglades National Park. On the other hand, it was noted, legislation introduced in the US Congress would permanently retain the presence of the Miccosukee Tribe within the Everglades National Park. Any agreement for providing a site for the Tribe's continued practice of its living culture may come into conflict with the restoration of water flows through the eastern Shark Slough (where the Miccosukee Tribe is located), considered to be a essential measure for the restoration of the overall Everglades ecosystem.

138 posted on 02/04/2005 1:22:12 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: sdpatriot
is there a quote where Bush said he is for LOST?

I'll check that and get back to you.

At Condis confirmation hearing she said she supported L.O.S.T. Don't you think that odd that that subject would come up at that time?

It is her job to do the presidents biding is it not?

139 posted on 02/04/2005 1:23:18 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth
"I'm sorry, but our national story doesn't end with us as UN chattel. We've beaten far worse then that bunch of dopes."

I can agree with that. Losing in that sense is unthinkable (doctrine from another branch--one that I was an instructor in). But at the same time, I disagree with radical environmentalism and its political associations. Its members, internal and external to our country, are too intent against private control/ownership of real property.
140 posted on 02/04/2005 1:24:20 AM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 781-795 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson