Skip to comments.Superbowl Myth Has More Lives Than a Cat
Posted on 02/04/2005 3:43:17 AM PST by FreeManDC
SUPERBOWL MYTH HAS MORE LIVES THAN A CAT
Just three days before the 1993 Super Bowl game, a news conference was called in Pasadena. There Sheila Kuehl, an attorney for the California Womens Law Center, stepped to the podium to report some shocking news: according to a study by Old Dominion University, emergency room admissions of women rose by 40% following football games won by the Washington Redskins.
Media representatives got the warning that Super Bowl Sunday is the biggest day of the year for violence against women. Soon a media advisory went out warning women, Dont remain at home with him during the game.
The next morning, Friday January 29, psychologist Lenore Walker appeared on Good Morning America and repeated the same frightening news.
By Saturday, the hysteria had reached a fever pitch. A January 30 Boston Globe article claimed that womens shelter and hotlines are flooded with more calls from victims than on any other day of the year.
Just before the coin flip for the big game, NBC ran a 30-second spot reminding men that domestic violence is a crime.
Then the Washington Post decided to do a little detective work. Post reporter Ken Ringle called Janet Katz, one of the researchers from Old Dominion University, to verify the claim. Thats not what we found at all, Katz responded. To the contrary, she said any increase in emergency room admissions was not associated with the occurrence of football games in general [www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp].
Ringles report, Wife Beating Claims, appeared on the front page of the Washington Post on January 31. This was the upshot of the story: the assertion that watching football games provokes men into a frenzy of wife-beating was actually a hoax.
Within hours, Lenore Walker and the Boston Globe reporter pulled back on their original claims, admitting they hadnt seen the original study. On February 2, the Boston Globe ran a retraction.
Later the Family Violence Prevention Fund would conclude, Although there are claims linking sports broadcasts to increased violence and abuse, no rigorous national studies have confirmed a link [http://endabuse.org/programs/display.php3?DocID=262].
The Super Bowl hoax is now cited in journalism textbooks as a case study in ways the media can mislead the public. But that doesnt stop the myth from being endlessly recycled.
Two years later, one NBC affiliate urged all women to pack a suitcase the evening before the Super Bowl, in case hubby got a little violent. Look around, and you will find the Super Bowl myth reported as fact in books, newspaper articles, and TV stories.
Just last year on January 30, Rebecca Cohn, member of the California State Assembly, issued a chilling press release. Calls to domestic violence shelters jump by a 40% increase on Superbowl Sunday, according to the release. Not only that, Attempted murders increase by 40% the week following the Superbowl game. [http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a24/press04/p242004004.htm] Amazing how that 40% figure keeps popping up all the time.
The factual errors and shrill tone of Cohns press release makes one wonder if the intent was to alarm and frighten, not educate and inform.
So how do we explain the creation and continuation of this domestic violence hoax?
Turns out, Senator Joe Biden of Delaware had been working since 1990 to get a law passed that would increase federal involvement in protecting battered women.
In 1994, one year after the press conference was called in Pasadena, the Violence Against Women Act was signed into law. The Act not only provided $3.5 billion in funding for programs to assist battered women, but also defined domestic partner abuse as gender violence, suggesting that only women are at risk. In another, less politically-correct era, this law never would have been passed, as some believe it violates the equal protection provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
Ten years later, the practical result is a law that discriminates against male victims, and refuses to acknowledge the existence of abusive women who need help.
The Violence Against Women Act will expire later this year, and domestic violence advocates are expected to introduce renewal legislation within the next few months.
So what propaganda-like stunts will they try to pull this time around?
Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News."
I only beat people up after a Yankee loss.
Never a football game.
Interesting they have no complaints at all about World Cup Soccer...hmmm!
What a load.
Now, about Global Warming....................
And please no flames, I am not one of those pro-lifers who bring the abortion debate to every thread.
Gosh, I only beat my wife and kids up in the 3rd quarter...
< /major league saracasm >
My son came home from school the other day repeating this nonsense.
To prove my point, I looked up "Superbowl Spousal Abuse" on snopes.com.
Is there a factual source I can access to put this lie to bed?
Thanks in advance.
Nevermind. I just looked up "Superbowl" at snopes.com and found the info.
Now if they really wanted to put this lie to rest, they would have tracked down Sheila Kuehl (the attorney who started this crap in '93), and had some NFL linebackers sit on her while the word *LIAR* was tattooed on her forehead and she could spend the rest of her life explaining what it was all about.
At the minimum, an attorney who lied to the public like that should be disbarred. Even Emperor Billigula had his license yanked after sufficient prodding to the Arkansas Bar.
It's said that 92.8 % of all statistics are simply made up on the spot.
Now if they really wanted to put this lie to rest, they would have tracked down Sheila Kuehl (the attorney who started this crap in '93
...actually, they just keep reelecting this most leftwing,
radical way out lesbian to the CA Senate so she can keep cramming her agenda down CA school kids throats...
The claim that Super Bowl Sunday is "the biggest day of the year for violence against women" demonstrates how easily an idea congruous with what people want to believe can be implanted in the public consciousness and anointed as "fact" even when it has been fabricated out of whole cloth.
(To buttress my point, snopes.com calls this a "noble lie".)
Where did you get that Denny Crane quote and who is he?
Numerous national reports reveal that domestic violence against men by women increases during major shopping events.
Yup, every year I'm black and blue until around Jan. 12th or so...
I only beat people up after a Yankee loss.Did you commit homicide after that choke job last October? </gloating sox fan>
Keep gloating. I hope you're three years old. Then you may live enough to see the next Sox championship.
When did you stop beating your wife bump.
During the Texas kidnapping of the pregnant woman, it kept being reported that murder was the Number One Cause of death of pregnant women (about 1300 since 1990.) One reporter did point out that this is because pre-natal care is so good that women don't die from pre-natal complications.
Uhh, hello, we all know it's the seriousness of the charge, not the nature of the evidence, that's most important!
And my independant poll is 100% behind that (I agree, in other words)
My favorite quote of all time:
"There are Lies, Damnable Lies, and Statistics"
- Mark Twain
Sheila is unfortunately easy to track down. just go to the CA Senate and mention the words "tax increase" or point a TV camera and ol' Sheila will come running.
As if they even keep this sort of stat for traffic fatalities.
"I haven't heard sounds like that since the orphanage burned down."
That's what's happening here, a classical example of a mental malfunction resulting in the same insipid, irrational statement being made over and over again no matter how much annoyance is expressed in ojection to it.
Screw Denny in the nose, I say.
Is there a diagnosis for this obsession, or has it recently manifested?
Sick. Funny, but sick. LOL.
Corollary advice: Halftime is not a good moment to talk about your "feelings."
However, I'm not going to do the data mining to see if it all adds up. (Unless someone pays me, of course.)
ALso, 85.37844 % of Americans don't understand significant digits.
"the" should be "they"
Spell chequeres our knot oil won mite hope four.
I figured out who "Denny" was already.
My favorite Twain quote "Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt".
A local anchor-babe said that "Despite increases in automobile safety, car accidents are still the #1 cause of death for children aged 5 and under."
Moron. Something has to be the #1 cause of death. What percentage of kids today die in car accidents as opposed to the % of kids who used to die by cholera or giant hyena?
Expecially if hubby bet the mortgage money.
It's a gratuitous pointless statement stuck into the middle of a thread that I'm trying to read and benefit from. It's causing me, and many other people who are also sick of it, to have to check the name on each post before reading so we can know whether to ignore it or not.
And this is an excellent example of reporters turning off their brains when they get a chance to parrot liberal propaganda.
1300 deaths since 1990 is about 100 deaths a year. There are about 4 million live births in the US every year.
How ignorant about basic mortality tables would you have be to believe that 100 deaths in a population of more than 4 million could possibly be the "leading cause of death"?
The population isn't 4,000,000 but rather consists of those pregnant women who die.
Now, class, who can tell me what types of typical mortality rates do we see for common causes of death in the population at large, especially those that affect folks in the typical pregnancy demographic? For example, class, please tell me typical mortality rates for auto accidents, cancer and suicide? Drownings? Sudden Brain Embolisms?
For extra credit, how do those numbers compare to the mortality rate given for pregnant women by the research reported by the Washington Post story? Much higher, eh, class?
Secondly, I happen to know a lot about the particular "research" Did you know that in order to make the number appear as high as possible, not only were pregnant women included, but any woman who was murdered who had had a baby up to a year before?
Well, now we're not just 2.5 per 100,000, we've dropped to 1.25 per 100,000. Pregnacy sounds like a pretty safe bet to me.
This claim is a complete fabrication - just like the "Superbowl Sunday" myth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.