Skip to comments.Savage: Iraq blue fingerprint election was a mere "prop"
Posted on 02/04/2005 5:55:37 PM PST by jwb0581
Michael Savage said tonight on his radio program that the Jan. 31st elections in Iraq were merely a fraud and a prop. Of all people I thought Savage would welcome democracy in the Middle East. But he seems to think that the Iraqis will install an Islamic fundamentalist state. I'd like to get some thoughts on this.
My thought is that Savage is wrong, as usual. He's the right's Michael Moore. Flame away!
More evidence that Savage is a headcase.
Savage? He's still on? What a tool.
Savage says a lot of things. An entire post for one comment of thousands he makes per show?
No fire from me scarecrow.
They should be able to choose their own leader. Besides the person they voted for has never been radical.
He obviously doesn't understand Shi'ites.
Separation of church and state is, literally, an article of faith with Shi'ites. The Iranian mullahs are the exception to the Shi'ite rule, not the rule.
Every month he gets kookier and kookier. I'm suprised he's still on the radio.
Savage did one good thing..He wrote a book that got my grandson interested in politics..He is so off the wall. I wonder if he is bi polar.
Savage doesn't understand Shi'ite.
No argument here,............ I just listened to him for a few minutes a short while ago.....couldn't stomach it and I am about as far right as you can get.....he just keeps getting worse!!
Here's a foolproof formula to create a Savage Bashing Thread (R). Take one comment he makes on the radio, completely without context and just post it. Sit back and watch the fireworks.
I hope they do it here, then the dems will really loose some elections.
Savage's mind is like a junkdrawer of facts--all tossed in there, in such a mess that you can't find anything when you need it.
Savage had a preoccupation with the term quisling. I wonder if it is based on his own self reflection.
Personally, I think he says alot of things just for the sake of a reaction and publicity.
Sometimes, I get the feeling that he's only taking a viewpoint and using the worst rhetoric, because doing research and knowing why its the right viewpoint and explaining requires to much work.
At least most talk guys can do homework or put in effort, Savage just works on soundbites.
Its about quality, and Savage does not qualify.
He has gone over the deep end--big time.
Shi'ite for brains.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.