Skip to comments.Was JonBenet Murder an AIM Signature Crime?
Posted on 02/05/2005 8:41:49 AM PST by Snapple
For some historical background link to http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1335495/posts
Don't blow me off too fast. I am pretty up to speed on my radical (alleged) Indian groups and their activities.
It is one thing in a big picture. He also assaulted his wife with a gun and was not allowed to carry weapons. Then he got caught with weapons.
The main thing is what Hill was doing to confuse the investigation with theories of a government-protected ring of pedophiles.
He was supposed to go to court for assault and weapons violations, but jumped bail.
Now maybe you are not old enough to remember when AIM was blowing up Mt Rushmore's visitor center, but I do.
This was Leonard Peltier's lawyer, and not just his lawyer, but an activist.
Thank you. Once people have seen it close up, they know what I am talking about. These are really crazy people.
Lee Hill writes about his relationship with Burroughs.
Hill claims to have met him when he was very young.
I read Hill talk about it on the Internet.
Burroughs made a record--which I bought for research purposes--where he pretends to be Hassan Sabbah. He basically does this fatwa against America. This is way before we ever heard of Osama.
Burroughs spent time in N. Africa after he accidently shot his wife in the middle of her forehead and fled Mexico probably after paying off some official.
He picked up a lot of that radical left Arab nationalism over there. I think he also picked up young boys and smoked a lot of dope, too.
He was a heroin addict.
i can see you're really into this.
there was no follow up as i remember in the times. sometimes this serves a purpose--to convey mis-information.
Citric Cycle...or IOW, the Krebs Cycle
Yes. He had the most negative energy I've ever experienced, sort of like a giant toilet that's perpetually flushing. All of the energy and oxygen just got sucked out of the room leaving everyone debilitated. The liberals apparently like the feeling.
Patsy, the son or one of the father's buddies makes more sense.
I'm real inclined to think the mom or the brother.
The brother might have just lost it after all the attention that got paid to Jon Benet, and the mom scribbles out the note as a cover.
"You want to know who killed JB?Her parents."You may be right,but they'ed have to both be exceptionally good liars.They came across as sincere on tv imo.What do you think about the intruder theory?
So how do you account for the fact that Lee Hill, Leonard Peltier's lawyer, was manufacturing all kinds of false evidence about this case. His clients got in trouble for trying to influence a grand jury--and then he claimed they weren't his clients. He made a big production aobut this crazy woman from California who was making allegations about pedophile rings. He claimed the FBI failed to hide her from the pedophiles so he had to hide her with AIM.
But why is he telling the papers if she is really in danger???
You have to look at how what happened in Boulder is like what happened to the Indians at Pine Ridge. In Pine Ridge and Boulder people were fed conspiracy theories against the FBI.
The Indians were being told people were dying suspicious deaths and that the authorities (on the reservations it is the FBI that investigates serous crimes) were not investigating and were posibly complicit with the killers.
They got the idea for this fairy take from reading the FBI files on the Osage Indian Murders, except that the FBI really helped the Indians by catching and prosecuting the killer John Ramsey.
In Boulder people were told that the FBI and Boulder authorities were protecting a ring of pedophiles who were highly-placed. When there was no evidence of a ring of important pedophiles, this was seen as proof that the FBI was doing a cover-up. It is so stupid, like the Salem witch trials.
AIM always tries to make the FBI look like they are a pack of criminals instead of the pretty good, if not perfect, law enforcement organization they are.
Now that Ward Churchill has gone too far, people will start looking at who all these AIM folks are and how they are manipulating the media.
Just because something makes more sense doesn't mean it is always the explanation. You need to look at the evidence. You need to look at the creeps in Boulder. Boulder has some real bad people. It is a breeding ground for radicals and terrorists. There are a lot of derelicts who use drugs hanging about. The wealthy people there are looked at with envy by many.
People who kill their children usually have problems. The Ramseys were not alcoholics or addicts. They were successful, churchgoing, active community members.
I find the beauty pagent thing sort of pretentious, but it is quite popular in the South where Patsy and John were from. It's not my thing, but so what?
It is not easy to hide the evidence you killed someone.
And the child has made DNA on her underwear supposedly.
The police are a bit vague about exactly what they've got.
I don't believe what I hear on TV. I listen to the police.
Here is a CNN article about the DNA. Now it does quote the Ramsey's lawyer, not the Boulder officials.
Nope. She was their rice bowl. People don't usually break their own rice bowls.
She was the one that got all the praise and attention. IT WAS HER BROTHER!
I don't know if anyone else has posted that CBS 48hrs., although I think the second WAsh. Times article might be referencing that. That was posted here, but I found it at google.
Why doesn't anyone get this?????
One of the supermarket tabloids disclosed the identity of the killer last month.
I can't believe AIM would kill a little girl if they simply wanted to discredit the Boulder Police and the FBI.
There was an FR article within the last few months that suggested Jon Bonet's murderer might have been involved in an attempted kidnapping of another beauty pageant contestant that competed against her.
Basically, that the murderer was someone, possibly an acquaintance, who knew both of them.
I don't think that AIM as an organization did this.
I think the person who did this is really a predator, but he doesn't like to think that about himself; so he uses AIM ideology to give a veneer of justification to this crime.
These old AIM activists live to discredit the FBI. That is what they do. If you can discredit law enforcement, you can take over the town or the reservation.
A lot of AIM people were criminals--burglars and drug dealers--who wanted the FBI (which investigates serious crimes on reservations) to be discredited so the Indians wouldn't come to the FBI for help or to report crimes.
I am only interested in evidence that meets the test of a courtroom. Lee Hill was influencing the media about this investigation.
The police will be quiet and do their jobs.
I think you are right. People are afraid so they pretend they don't see the bulllies.
Ah! I see now. Thanks for clearing it up.