Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Aim to Narrow GOP Congress Majority
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS via NY Times ^ | February 8, 2005 | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 02/08/2005 11:29:32 AM PST by 68skylark

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Shy and retiring aren't terms that spring to mind to describe Sen. Charles Schumer and Rep. Rahm Emanuel, new political point men for out-of-power congressional Democrats.

Try aggressive or combative.

By his own account, Emanuel asked President Clinton to butt out when the chief executive walked into the religious study sessions the one-time White House aide held with his rabbi.

And Schumer?

Democratic Sen. Jon Corzine of New Jersey once joked to an audience of journalists that the most dangerous ground in Washington was between the New York senator and a television camera. And he wasn't the first member of Congress to say so.

So it wasn't surprising that both Schumer and the Illinois congressman haggled with their own party leaders before agreeing to head the Senate and House campaign efforts. They wound up with coveted assignments to Congress' tax-writing committees as well as other concessions.

``They are the two hardest-working men in show business,'' said Howard Wolfson, who worked on Schumer's first Senate campaign in New York in 1998 and oversaw national strategy for Emanuel when the House Democrat won his Chicago-area seat in 2002. ``They will live, breathe, sleep, eat and drink this effort.''

It may not be enough.

Historical trends point to Democratic gains in 2006, the second midterm elections of President Bush's administration. But last November's elections pushed Democrats deeper into the minority in both houses, and in separate interviews, neither Schumer nor Emanuel predicted they would break the GOP hold on power next year.

``Our job will be to try and pick up seats,'' said Schumer, looking at an election lineup with more Democratic than Republican seats on the ballot.

Democrats would have to gain 15 House seats in 2006 to reclaim the majority they lost a decade ago. Yet the number of competitive seats has dwindled since the last redistricting.

GOP Rep. Tom Reynolds, a New Yorker who heads the House Republican campaign committee, says flatly, ``Republicans will be in the majority'' when the 2006 votes are counted.

For Schumer and Emanuel, the challenge is straightforward, if steep. Recruited in part for their fund-raising prowess, they must pull money from their political bases in Democratic-friendly states to use for candidates who can win in states that Bush took in November.

``I've got to win seats where there are seats,'' Emanuel said, acknowledging that many of the competitive battles are likely to be in Republican states or rural areas where Democrats have struggled in recent years. ``We had 11 competitive open seats last cycle and we won two of them. ... That's just unacceptable.''

So far, the two men are in the early stages of recruiting, and are talking of developing a more compelling Democratic message. Fund raising has begun. The $4 million debt that confronted Schumer is gone, and the $11 million hole dug by the House committee is reduced.

Schumer, 54, was elected to the New York Legislature at age 23, stepped up to Congress six years later and remained in the House 18 years before successfully challenging a veteran Republican for a Senate seat.

He showed separation from party liberals in his first statewide campaign by emphasizing support for stronger anti-crime measures, including a broader death penalty. He hastens to point out that he won 61 of 62 New York counties in his re-election campaign last fall.

``Lucky for you there aren't two of me,'' Schumer once told Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, with a smile at the end of a fierce committee struggle over one of Bush's judicial nominees.

``It's a great blessing for the country,'' was Hatch's in-kind reply.

Emanuel, 45, has been known to pinch people when he felt that words weren't strong enough to be persuasive. He clashed with fellow aides at the White House, and those who have dealt with him say he can be verbally abusive.

Still, those who know him also say he has mellowed from the time more than a decade ago when he sent a Democratic pollster a dead fish as a gesture of his esteem, an event that was well-chronicled at the time.

His ascent has been rapid. In the late 1980s -- still the era of a seemingly permanent Democratic House majority -- he worked for the committee he now heads. That was followed by a stint in Clinton's White House, then a successful turn at investment banking in Illinois. His fund-raising, aided by connections to Clinton, helped him win the nomination to Congress in 2002, and he coasted to victory in the fall.

At some point, it's likely the political imperatives of Schumer and Emanuel will collide.

Already, Schumer is courting Democratic House members to run for the Senate, while Emanuel must discourage Democratic House retirements so he can focus his efforts on GOP-held seats.

^------

On the Net:

Sen. Charles Schumer: http://schumer.senate.gov/

Rep. Rahm Emanuel: http://www.house.gov/emanuel/


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dems; electioncongress; electionushouse; electionussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The article doesn't say anything about new Democartic ideas (or old ones) for growing liberty and prosperity, either at home or abroad.

It's just about personalities and money.

1 posted on 02/08/2005 11:29:33 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: 68skylark

Is it just me, or is the title of the article really odd? What is up with that...of course they are. And the sun rises in the morning.


3 posted on 02/08/2005 11:31:21 AM PST by Lekker 1 (A government policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul [G.B. Shaw])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lekker 1
Yeah, the story (and the headline) has a dog-bites-man quality to it.

The AP wants to get Democrats into the news any way they can -- they're trying to make the look human. I assume that's the main reason for the story.
4 posted on 02/08/2005 11:33:58 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

illusions of grandeur...

With Howard Dean as their leader, they're like a one legged man in a butt kicking contest! LMAO


5 posted on 02/08/2005 11:35:17 AM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I hate that politicians worry and work more for their own "seats" (literally) than for the promises they make to the public to get elected in the first place. Wonder what would happen if they were paid based on results rather than by salary. Hmmmmm, might make a big difference if they had to sweat like us common folk.


6 posted on 02/08/2005 11:38:32 AM PST by lilredhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
They keep on saying about how they're "supposed" to gain seats. They haven't done so for a while, and when you have a loosing platform, you'll continue to constantly loose

Just wait 'til the Dems start losing seats at a smaller rate!!!! What wonderful headlines!

7 posted on 02/08/2005 11:38:55 AM PST by Lekker 1 (A government policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul [G.B. Shaw])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

If they handled it right, they could use Social Security to scare the seniors in states like Florida and in the rust belt and pick up a couple of house seats and maybe bump off Santorum. But it doesn't look like they are doing that. The in-your-face obstructionist attitude of Reid and Pelosi will continue turn people off. If they were smart they would be up there saying how it is the obligation of government to safeguard social security blah blah blah, and that all solutions should be examined blah blah blah, and they welcome the Presidents ideas but regretfully, after looking at the figures the scheme that the president proposes will leave too many people in poverty blah blah blah, cost to much, etc. ect. etc. In other words take a page from the Republican playbook of acting bi-partisan in public and obstruct in private.


8 posted on 02/08/2005 11:39:07 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Emanuel, 45, has been known to pinch people when he felt that words weren't strong enough to be persuasive.

Rahm Emanuel, ballet dancer who likes to pinch people.

9 posted on 02/08/2005 11:42:26 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

If the Dems like Chuck Schumer is their answer, they're not paying attention. Picking one of the leaders of the obstructionist movement will not help the Democrats...it will hurt them. And there was much rejoicing.


10 posted on 02/08/2005 11:45:21 AM PST by Calvarys_Soldier (I'm just like MIchael Moore...except I'm conservative, I wash my jeans, and God loves me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Dems Aim to Narrow GOP Congress Majority

Meanwhile, darkness is forecast for later this evening.

11 posted on 02/08/2005 11:45:57 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

" Emanuel, 45, has been known to pinch people when he felt that words weren't strong enough to be persuasive "

How manly. This guy always looks like he he has the energy level of a slug and the emotional affect of a piece of cardboard.
He should never sit in the emergency exit row on an aircraft.


12 posted on 02/08/2005 11:47:29 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Just more Dem PR drom the commie loving AP.


13 posted on 02/08/2005 11:49:14 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Dems Aim to Narrow GOP Congress Majority

Yeah. Making Howard "I'm-Loonier-than-you-are,-hear-me-scream" Dean the DNC chair is NOT the best way to do this.

Dream on, Desperate Dems!!
14 posted on 02/08/2005 11:49:32 AM PST by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
THINK SMALL - LOSE SMALL
go dean go
15 posted on 02/08/2005 11:50:00 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

"Recruited in part for their fund-raising prowess, they must pull money from their political bases in Democratic-friendly states to use for candidates who can win in states that Bush took in November."

And with 97 of the 100 fastest growing counties going to Bush, it is uphill for dems.

All talk with Dean, etc. has been about organization and money.

It is, however, ideas and beliefs that stand between dems and victories.


16 posted on 02/08/2005 11:50:01 AM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
In other news, scientists say the ocean is salty.
17 posted on 02/08/2005 11:50:09 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

The Dems ought to try for something more achievable, such as losing less than 6 Senate seats in 2006.


18 posted on 02/08/2005 11:50:15 AM PST by thoughtomator (reporting from Cylon-occupied Caprica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

If that little creep pinched me, he'd be wearing his little balls as earrings.


19 posted on 02/08/2005 11:50:24 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Gregoire is French for Stealing an Election*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Meanwhile, darkness is forecast for later this evening.

...with light coming into the sky somewhere around dawn. Film at 11.

20 posted on 02/08/2005 11:51:05 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson