Oh but you did say it. Right here in Post 8
I meant it in the context of responding to those who felt someone who commited a crime years ago is too old to be prosecuted.
So in the next sentence you admit you said it but in a different context? Tell us dear. How exactly should we take it if that is the only statement you made in that post without seeing any of the evidence or knowing the full details of the crime?
And you have a point that I am fully taking to heart.
That's more than evident and it's clouded your judgement on two wrongs don't make a right. If he is convicted fairly in criminal court, he should face the fullest punishment available to the courts. But to dismiss his alibi out of hand because you may not like him and he belonged to a group that neither of us agree with is not only foolish, it is wrong.