Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman's Attacker Obsessed With Motherhood
AP ^ | 2.13.05

Posted on 02/13/2005 1:00:14 PM PST by ambrose

Posted on Sun, Feb. 13, 2005

Woman's Attacker Obsessed With Motherhood

Associated Press

FORT MITCHELL, Ky. - A woman stabbed to death while possibly trying to steal a pregnant woman's fetus had been carrying an ultrasound picture of someone else's twins and was wearing maternity clothing filled with padding.

Police said 26-year-old Sarah Brady, who was nine months pregnant, acted in self-defense Thursday when she killed Katherine Smith.

No charges had been filed Sunday and Commonwealth Attorney Bill Crockett said he hadn't decided whether to present the case to a grand jury.

The attack happened after Smith called Brady and asked her to come over and pick up a package supposedly delivered to her by mistake.

"She was mentally disturbed," Fort Mitchell police Sgt. Tom Loos said of Smith. "There is no question about it."

Smith, 22, had been falsely telling neighbors for weeks that she was pregnant, and a search of her apartment after her death revealed a full baby nursery, investigators said.

Brady told police she was attacked when she went into Smith's first-floor apartment to look at the woman's nursery. Police released details of Brady's statement Saturday.

"Katie reached into her pocket, pulled out this knife that was already open, put it in the overhand thrust position and attacked her with it," Loos said. "Sarah was able to make it out into the hallway, but Katie reached out, grabbed her by the hair, and pulled her back in."

Loos said it appears that Brady struck Smith on the head with an ash tray and then grabbed the knife, stabbing Smith three times, including once in the upper chest.

Loos said that when Brady ran out of the apartment and flagged down a passing motorist for help, Smith removed her maternity underwear stuffed with padding and called 911. Dispatchers kept her on the line until she lost consciousness.

Smith bled to death. Police described Brady's wounds as cuts to her hands.

Loos said Sunday that as far as he knew Brady had not yet delivered, although her due date was reported as Friday.

Smith also had an ultrasound picture of unborn twins, and claimed they were her twins from an earlier pregnancy who died at birth, but Loos said it was another woman's ultrasound. She also claimed to have a scar from a Caesarean section, but investigators said it was from another surgical procedure.

"She convinced everyone she knew that she had two deliveries, previously, in hospitals and that those babies died at the time of delivery," he said.

"She was clearly obsessed with motherhood," Loos said.

A spokeswoman for St. Elizabeth Medical Center South in Edgewood said Smith worked there from January 2003 through April 2004. Hospital officials wouldn't say what job she had or why she left after 15 months.

One of her last jobs was as a nanny, a job she lost shortly after Thanksgiving, when her employer began to doubt her pregnancy story, Loos said.

Several pregnant women have been killed in recent years by attackers who then removed their fetuses, in some cases to pass the children off as their own.

In December, a Missouri woman was strangled and her baby was cut from her womb. The baby was later found alive, and a Kansas woman was charged with kidnapping resulting in death. In 2003, a woman was shot to death in Oklahoma, allegedly by another woman who then pretended the 6-month-old fetus was her child. That fetus died.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: katherinesmith; sarahbrady

1 posted on 02/13/2005 1:00:15 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ambrose

After seeing at least a few stories like this in the news lately, my mind kept turning to the issue of birth control. As in, isn't it possible that, at times, wanting children may in fact be more wrong than not wanting them?


2 posted on 02/13/2005 1:05:04 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Police described Brady's wounds as cuts to her hands

These are usually defensive wounds, and a good indicator someone tried to fend off a knife attack.

3 posted on 02/13/2005 1:06:44 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: k2blader

Some people.. in fact, many people... have no business procreating.


4 posted on 02/13/2005 1:08:24 PM PST by ambrose (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Exactly, so why would he even think of taking it to the Grand Jury. The woman has been through enough.


5 posted on 02/13/2005 1:11:22 PM PST by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Exactly, so why would he even think of taking it to the Grand Jury. The woman has been through enough.


6 posted on 02/13/2005 1:11:36 PM PST by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Goodgirlinred
Exactly, so why would he even think of taking it to the Grand Jury.

Best guess, if the prosecutor isn't entirely certain about the circumstances of the case, he can present it to a grand jury. If the grand jury refuses to indict, it shows how weak a case it is, since the only lawyer who talks to the grand jury is the prosecutor. Basically, submitting a very weak case to a grand jury is an easy way out. Given that this is a homicide, that might be attractive to the prosecutor.

7 posted on 02/13/2005 1:14:20 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
...Commonwealth Attorney Bill Crockett said he hadn't decided whether to present the case to a grand jury.

Hasn't decided yet? What's to decide? A pregnant woman is especially vulnerable and she doesn't have a lot of options when it comes to defending herself. She can't move very quickly and she's awkward because of the size of her belly. She had no choice and it should be obvious to the prosecutor.

8 posted on 02/13/2005 1:18:54 PM PST by SilentServiceCPOWife (Romeo&Juliet, Troilus&Crisedye, Bogey&Bacall, Gable&Lombard, Brigitte&Flav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

"Commendable Homicide"


9 posted on 02/13/2005 1:23:23 PM PST by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
It is self-defense. Surely the police can determine that.
10 posted on 02/13/2005 1:31:36 PM PST by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Baby Rabies.

The pregnant women is lucky to have survived while defending herself from the diseased phyco.


11 posted on 02/13/2005 2:31:08 PM PST by Chewbacca (GATA be in it to win it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Commonwealth Attorney Bill Crockett said he hadn't decided whether to present the case to a grand jury.

and why would this still be in question. Hasn't this poor woman gone thru enough without that possibility hanging over her head.

12 posted on 02/13/2005 6:04:37 PM PST by maine-iac7 (...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time - LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goodgirlinred
Exactly, so why would he even think of taking it to the Grand Jury. The woman has been through enough.

There is a very valid reason for taking it to the Grand Jury, and that's to protect Ms Brady legally. Given the facts as we currently know them (and note that I am not stating the facts are otherwise), a verdict of Justifiable Homicide, Self Defense is pretty much a given. This would preclude any relative of the dead woman from launching a vindictive wrongful death civil suit, which would be even worse for her...

the infowarrior

13 posted on 02/13/2005 6:58:05 PM PST by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

Oh. Thank you for clarifying that for me. You must be an attorney.


14 posted on 02/13/2005 7:04:09 PM PST by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Goodgirlinred
Nope, nor do I play one on tv. It's just common sense that a verdict of Justifiable Homicide would gut any chance of a "wrongful" (ie, unjustifiable) death suit. The police do not have the authority to declare an incident self defense, legally, and a DA which declined to prosecute would provide some cover, but far less than a grand jury verdict would...

the infowarrior

15 posted on 02/13/2005 7:20:50 PM PST by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior

Oh. Thank you. I learn something new every day on here. :)


16 posted on 02/13/2005 7:33:57 PM PST by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson