Skip to comments.Gays Debate Radical Steps to Curb Unsafe Sex
Posted on 02/15/2005 4:30:35 AM PST by infocats
"After all the thousands of AIDS deaths and all the years of "Safe Sex Is Hot Sex" prevention messages, it has come down to this: many gay men who know the rules of engagement in the age of AIDS are not using condoms. As news of a potentially virulent strain of H.I.V. settles in, gay activists and AIDS prevention workers say they are dismayed and angry that the 25-year-old battle against the disease might have to begin all over again.
While many are calling for a renewed commitment to prevention efforts and free condoms, some veterans of the war on AIDS are advocating an entirely new approach to the spread of unsafe sex, much of which is fueled by a surge in methamphetamine abuse. They want to track down those who knowingly engage in risky behavior and try to stop them before they can infect others.
Full Story (free sign in required)
Homosexual sex in the human sewer system gives them a renewed kick in the ass.
What's next Mr. Surge and Urge?
And what will they do? Force the "risky" at gunpoint to wrap their rascals...?
They reap what they sow.
EXIT ONLY tatoos on their butts?
Track them down and kill them? This could get interesting. But I will leave it to them to figure out.
Here's an idea, "tab-A'" goes is "slot-B" not "slot-C". Read the directions before attempting at home.
EXIT ONLY tattoos on their butts?
How about self-control? Nah, that's probably way too radical for the moral relativity crowd.
The only way they are going to stop Aids is to make the queers sit down and keep their mouths shut.
This type of behavior, no matter how risky (risk is part of the attraction, seemingly) is going to continue despite the attempts from outside to intervene. Even attempts from within the subculture have not been effective in putting a stop to the spread of disease. AIDS seems to be the only disease we discuss, but there are a multitude of others that are spread quickly by the same means.
The only real chance we have of beating this scourge is finding a cure. Certainly, and end to gay sex would be a start, but it ain't gonna happen. What is needed, is an innoculation like we have for so many other deadly diseases that used to take lives - we never give them a thought these days, except as the name of a shot on our medical records.
We can't hope to control human behavior. When has that ever worked well?
Excellent response and tagline.
Thanks. I've been considering other quotes for tagline, but I hate for this great quote to go unused.
Unless you can change the nature of men, I don't see any hope for it. Men are aggressive, and men-on-men are doubly so.
What needs to happen is to prevent our young people from growing into this behavior.
Since that's not the agenda of the homosexual lobby, I have no sympathy for them.
How about stick a gun to their head and shoot'em. Nah, that won't work, they're already effectively doing that. If it were not for the fear of the disease jumping to the non-deviant social groups, I would say, "don't interrupt them."
Sew their asses shut and install a colostomy bag.
Do moral relativists see the irony in their making suggestions as to what people should and shouldn't do? I didn't think so. Ah well.
I have wondered that myself. Can they not see that they attempt to force their moral relativity upon others as if it's an absolute, thereby making themselves hypocrites? However, even if they did, in their egotism, they would likely exclude themselves, since they know better than everyone else.
Lots of same-sex marriage protests?
Aids probably would hardly exist if quarantines were put in place from the start. These people have a deadly communicable disease and are allowed to walk around spreading it to anyone they please. I wonder how many people AIDS political correctness has killed?
The CURE for AIDS was available and told to people as far back as AIDS started becoming generally known.
The cure is: Keep it in your pants.
Pray for W and Our Troops
The only safe sex is chastity.
Tattooed warnings (preceded by mandatory tests, as were done for syphilis for years).
We can and should disagree politically, and do so as forcefully as we can. But suggesting - even in fun - that those with AIDS should be shot so they won't spread the infection doesn't sound like a good approach.
Yes, I know my tagline is irreverent, and maybe it is even over-the-top. But I'm not advocating the slaughter of gays.
Most certainly every non-homosexual AIDS victim.
That'd make a darned good tag line. ;o)
Imagined exchange prior to this new strain:
THOUSANDS OF QUEERS: I am actually going to seek out infected "partners".
GOD: NOW you've REALLY made me mad!
LOL! That advice just ruined my keyboard !
"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
"Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, München.
By: - Dr. Etienne de Harven
In conclusion, and after extensive reviewing of the current AIDS research literature, the following statement appears inescapable: neither electron microscopy nor molecular markers have so far permitted a scientifically sound demonstration of retrovirus isolation directly from AIDS patients.
This conclusion fully confiens the recent reports published in Continuum by E. Papadopulos and by S. Lanka.
Dr. Etienne de Harven is emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy (EM) primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York and 13 years at the University of Toronto. In 1956 he was the first to report on the EM of the Friend virus in murine (mouse) leukemia, and in 1960, to coin the word "budding" to describe steps of virus assembly on cell surfaces. He will deliver a speech at the 12th World AIDS Conference in Geneva (June 28-July 3) at the session "HIV-testing: Open Questions about Specificity".
No evidence for the existence of HIV
By: - Stefan Lanka Ph.D. studied Virology at the University of Koblenz, Germany.
Such evidence has up till now never been produced for HIV. No photograph of an isolated HIV particle has ever been published nor of any of its proteins or nucleic acids. No control experiments as mentioned above have been published to date. What has been shown are photographs of virus-like particles in cell cultures, but none of isolated viruses, let alone of a structure within the human body having the shape ascribed to HIV. What the whole world has seen are models representing HIV with dish aerials, said to be receptors with which the virus attaches itself to cells.
The existence of HIV is inferred from an antibody test, but how this is supposed to work, when the virus has never been shown to exist and obtained free of contaminants, remains a mystery.
When they die.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.