Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do smokers have any rights?
eco-logic Powerhouse.com ^ | February 15, 2005 | Alan Caruba

Posted on 02/15/2005 8:24:48 AM PST by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last
To: SheLion

Interesting. This might be a good idea. Thanks. Will look into it thru the links you provided.


41 posted on 02/15/2005 9:13:11 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn
Why is it PC to smoke pot in public but not tobacco?

I'm not sure if it IS legal to smoke in public.  I know a lot of people are getting pot through prescriptions, so maybe they can smoke it in public.  I haven't been following marijuana.

42 posted on 02/15/2005 9:13:53 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
No, because these are not addictive.

Who says they can't make them addictive? Didn't tobacco companies do exactly that?

43 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:01 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Correct-a-mundo!

Smoke em if ya got em but I DON'T want to breathe it and if ya get sick, suck it up.


44 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:05 AM PST by HMFIC (Fourth Generation American INFIDEL and PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

45 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:29 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
ASH will pursue laws that ban parents from smoking around their children, by getting courts to issue orders to ban smoking in custody cases, or by a foster parent, or in a car, while driving children anywhere.

Why should a child of a person be forced to breathe SHS while the employee of the same person is protected from having to breathe SHS ?

46 posted on 02/15/2005 9:15:33 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Actually, it boils down to simple discrimination!


47 posted on 02/15/2005 9:16:23 AM PST by beachn4fun ("Resistance is futile, but I may be placated with chocolates")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I have asthma and am extremely allergic to cigarette smoke. One good whiff can land me in the ER.

However, even I realize that places of establishment, such as a restaurant, should have the right to CHOOSE THEMSELVES if they will allow smoking. There are places here that banned smoking before it became law. Those are the places I enjoy going as it was their choice to accommodate me.

The gov't should have no right to prohibit smoking in privately owned establishments. However, those public buildings such as city hall's that I have to go to, I think should be smoke free.

The gov't,however, seems to think they should be able to control it anywhere-seems YOUR HOME will be next! And it won't stop with smoking!

48 posted on 02/15/2005 9:18:40 AM PST by housewife101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun
Actually, it boils down to simple discrimination!

Worse then that!  They outlawed discrimination (it's even against the law to attack gays), but I guess smoker's are fair game.

49 posted on 02/15/2005 9:19:02 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

You got that. Of course the 9th doesn't cover their right to burn candles, charcoal or propane gas around others.

Take a look at the 11th, there you will see it is the right of the property owner to allow tobacco burning on his property.


50 posted on 02/15/2005 9:19:51 AM PST by CSM ("I just started shooting," said Gloria Doster, 56. "I was trying to blow his brains out ....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Yeah, I know, but smoker's are the last group that CAN be discriminated against and they haven't a case!


51 posted on 02/15/2005 9:20:08 AM PST by beachn4fun ("Resistance is futile, but I may be placated with chocolates")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Are you one of those conservatives that believe the only rights we have were specifically called out in the constitution? Do you believe that the government grants us rights?


52 posted on 02/15/2005 9:20:55 AM PST by CSM ("I just started shooting," said Gloria Doster, 56. "I was trying to blow his brains out ....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: housewife101
The gov't should have no right to prohibit smoking in privately owned establishments. However, those public buildings such as city hall's that I have to go to, I think should be smoke free.

The gov't,however, seems to think they should be able to control it anywhere-seems YOUR HOME will be next! And it won't stop with smoking!

I am all for no smoking in grocery stores, government buildings, elevators, etc.  But restaurants, bars, taverns and sports inns?  They had/have smoking sections and non-smoking sections and have installed large smoke eaters to accommodate everyone. But that still wasn't good enough for the anti-smoker's.  And here we sit.

There are 7 smoke-free states.  I just hope the rest learn a lesson from this and not follow suit.

If the government goes into a person's home to forbid smoking, they may as well ban cigarettes and tobacco products.

53 posted on 02/15/2005 9:22:30 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: beachn4fun

Yeah, I know, but smoker's are the last group that CAN be discriminated against and they haven't a case!

Are we ready to give up Freedom of Choice in this Country?


54 posted on 02/15/2005 9:23:39 AM PST by SheLion (God bless our military members and keep them safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I feel special. Is this just for me ?
55 posted on 02/15/2005 9:25:34 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The smoke Gnatzies will ban us all to the colony.


56 posted on 02/15/2005 9:25:51 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Reading is fundamental. Comprehension is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: housewife101

I'm a smoker and I would be more than happy to enjoy a conversation with you over a brew in a smoke free establishment. Your post is refreshing, thanks.


57 posted on 02/15/2005 9:26:07 AM PST by CSM ("I just started shooting," said Gloria Doster, 56. "I was trying to blow his brains out ....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Unless we can convince some lawyer or the ACLU (yeah, I know........bwahahahahaha) to represent us in a discrimination case, we may very well lose it.

Besides many people in this country are forced to give up Freedom of Choice.


58 posted on 02/15/2005 9:26:58 AM PST by beachn4fun ("Resistance is futile, but I may be placated with chocolates")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

"I'm a smoker, and I believe you should have the right to smoke. However, I am going to try to quit because Phillip Morris contributes the the ACLU!"

Any reason to quit is a good one. Go for it. Save your money and your health.


59 posted on 02/15/2005 9:28:03 AM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
If the government goes into a person's home to forbid smoking, they may as well ban cigarettes and tobacco products

I mentioned this because there was a lawsuit trying to prohibit someone from smoking in or around there own home due to the non-smoker next door.Of course, they don't want to ban them all together, the gov't needs the money! BTW, if someone is as allergic to cigarette smoke as I am, those smoke eaters and smoking, non-smoking sections don't work.

That doesn't bother me, however, I choose to go to those restaurants in which I can survive! :-) They shouldn't be required to accomodate those of us who happen to have problems I am also highly allergic to certain parfumes, but I don't expect them to stop allowing people to wear it! :-)

60 posted on 02/15/2005 9:28:43 AM PST by housewife101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson