Skip to comments.
States Mull Taxing Drivers By Mile
CBS
| February 14, 2005
| [none cited]
Posted on 02/15/2005 10:18:28 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: Admin Moderator
Please remove dupe post, thanks! Didn't seem to post 1st time.
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Will the gasoline tax be eliminated when the "per mile" tax is added?
3
posted on
02/15/2005 10:23:07 AM PST
by
lews
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.~Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
4
posted on
02/15/2005 10:23:09 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Translation: SUVs are evil. Gas guzzlers are evil. You must drive fuel efficeint vehicles to save not only America but the planet. But don't dare pay a penny less in taxes by doing so!
5
posted on
02/15/2005 10:23:48 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: lews
Will the gasoline tax be eliminated when the "per mile" tax is added? I hope you know the answer.
6
posted on
02/15/2005 10:24:15 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
One of the worst ideas since the Stamp Act.
To: Publius Scipio
Then perhaps the taxing bodies should tax smokers with a replacement tax as they quit smoking.
8
posted on
02/15/2005 10:26:35 AM PST
by
Thebaddog
(Dawgs off the coffee table.)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
But tax-by-mile advocates say it may be the only way to ensure that fuel efficiency doesn't prevent smooth sailing down the road.That's simply not true. If someone's beef is that the newer cars are more fuel effient, therefore causing more were and tear on the roads per gallon of fuel (though the cars are fuel efficient partly because they are light, thus wearing the roads less per mile), that can be fixed by adjusting the AMOUNT of the per gallon tax. There's no reason to jump all the way to some new technology they could use (and therefore would eventually use) to invade our privacy.
Also, the per mile method "favors the rich" as SUV miles would presumably be taxed the same as Greenie-mobile miles, despite having a differing effect on the roadbed (so liberals aren't supposed to like it).
9
posted on
02/15/2005 10:26:56 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: Phantom Lord
AND we get to keep tabs on where you drive!
10
posted on
02/15/2005 10:28:51 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
it will never pass. there will be such a huge market for cars with disconnected odometers, it will be chaos.
To: Thebaddog
I'm sure Blob Reiner is already working on that.
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Privacy advocates say it's more like big brother riding on your bumper, not to mention a disincentive to buy fuel-efficient cars. It's more like big brother's riding in our pocket.
13
posted on
02/15/2005 10:30:46 AM PST
by
NRA2BFree
(NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
To: NRA2BFree
There's something in my pocket for Big Brother! ;-)
14
posted on
02/15/2005 10:31:52 AM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: Phantom Lord
Cigarettes are evil but we won't outlaw them because we love to tax YOU to death (if the smoke doesn't get you the taxes will).
To: lews
Will the gasoline tax be eliminated when the "per mile" tax is added? ROTFLMAO. I'm sure you meant that sarcastically.
16
posted on
02/15/2005 10:35:32 AM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
"So, if you drive 10 miles you will pay a certain fee which will be, let's say, one tenth of what someone pays if they drive 100 miles," says Kim.And then they go and try to confuse us poor tax-paying schmoes with complex mathematical formulae!
Oh, by the way -- to h-ll with this plan for many, many reasons.
17
posted on
02/15/2005 10:38:23 AM PST
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
And it will cost how much to implement, oversee, gas police, et al...?
18
posted on
02/15/2005 10:40:13 AM PST
by
unixfox
(AMERICA - 20 Million ILLEGALS Can't Be Wrong!)
To: Phantom Lord
Translation: SUVs are evil. Gas guzzlers are evil. You must drive fuel efficeint vehicles to save not only America but the planet. But don't dare pay a penny less in taxes by doing so!FUEL-EFFICIENT CARS ARE EVIL ..... . If you live close to another state, fill up in that state (you may need some auxiliary tanks).
19
posted on
02/15/2005 10:44:56 AM PST
by
PetroniDE
(Profile of Winners: Boston Red Sox, New England Patriots, President G.W. Bush, Free Republic)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
When will they implement the Oxygen tax?
20
posted on
02/15/2005 10:52:52 AM PST
by
mowowie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson