Posted on 02/15/2005 10:42:00 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
Democratic Sen. John Kerry, whose baffling explanation of votes on Iraq war funding hurt his 2004 White House bid, said on Tuesday he would back President Bush's new $81.9 billion request for Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I think we're in a very different situation," Kerry told reporters. "I'm going to vote for this ... I think this money is important to our being successful and to the completion of the process."
The Massachusetts senator, who failed in his bid to unseat Bush last November in an election focused on national security, defended his decision to not back the president's previous request to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Mine was the right vote at the time and I wouldn't change it if we went back to that point in time because it was the right vote," Kerry said. "We didn't have a plan and they didn't spend the money correctly."
In October 2003, a year after voting to support the use of force in Iraq, Kerry voted against an $87 billion supplemental funding bill for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. He did support an unsuccessful alternative bill that funded the $87 billion by cutting some of Bush's tax cuts.
In March last year as the presidential campaign heated up, Kerry provided his Republican opponents with political ammunition when he sought to explain the move by saying: "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it."
"Should we have done a better job, could I have done a better job personally in fighting back on defining that?" Kerry asked. "The answer is yeah."
Kerry said the United States would have made better progress on Iraq, where an insurgency continues to rage almost two years after the March 2003 invasion, if he had been elected. He asserted the Bush administration was only now "trying some of the things" he proposed such as focusing on training Iraqi forces and getting other countries involved.
"I think my security proposals for the country were smack on, dead on," Kerry said.
Bush's request is expected to be approved by lawmakers despite concerns in the U.S. Congress about record federal budget deficits.
He'll vote for it. Until he complains about it.
So he is for it, now I'm just waiting for him to be against it.
"I voted for it before I decided to vote against it!"
Wrong war, wrong place, wrong time? Right money?
Is this the Flip or the Flop?
What will is be next week, horse-face jackass?
There's still time for him to change his mind!
I actually will vote FOR the 81 Billion dollars in Iraq --- before I vote against it. You go, Pumpkin Boy
He really is in favor of this bill before he votes against it. LOL!
He made decision on voting against it based on a future event that had not happened as of yet. How could "they" not spend the money correctly if it hadn't been approved yet? This guy is just so confusing...
Is John Kerry still alive?
There is probably some money in there for Mass.-based defense contractors.
Nah, just "nuanced".
That should be a rubber room. In fact every democrat should have one.
THEY'RE ALL NUTS!
Who's this Kerry fellow again?
ROFL!!!
You think Kerry is still smarting from his 87 Billion comment?
"Mine was the right vote at the time and I wouldn't change it if we went back to that point in time because it was the right vote"
This is just about the single most baffling statement I have ever heard. I'm sure folks in Massachusetts are mighty proud.
Rest assured, he wet his finger and stuck it in the wind before he made this decision.....
HEH HEH! Don't want to screw up again in 2008 do ya Kerry? I bet there won't be ONE mention about your Vietnaaaaaaaaaam record in your run in 2008 will there?
Do you really think he will show up to vote? Odds are he won't.
Tue Feb 15, 1:38 PM ET AFP Senator John Kerry (news - web sites) accused the US government of ignoring offers of aid and support for the Iraqi security forces from its allies.(AFP/File/Nicholas Kamm)
Wanna see my happy hat??
LOL!!
It's amazing...virtually every one of kerry's so-called "plans" concerning the Iraq war, i.e., training of Iraqi troops, etc., are the actual plans that President Bush has had in place and is pursuing. President Bush has had this poseur's number from the git-go.
kerry is a clueless schmuck that just needs to go away.
Is Kerry a moron?
"The answer is yeah."
Truly amazing. He voted for it, before he voted against it, before he voted for it!
If you wipe away the ketchup smear what he really meant was "I think I'm in a very different situation."
You've got to remember that Lurch and the kool-aid drinking Democrats believe that voting to give the President authority to use the U.S. military was based on the assumption that he wouldn't actually use it. Or some such.
I made a concerted effort to talk to liberals prior to the election. It was painful, and I'm glad it's over now.
So now he wants to give the "trigger happy yahoos" (as he characterized our American servicemen in his recent autobiography) the money to do their jobs?
Yeah right John. Keep on talking. You'll forever be known as the backstabbing gigolo who took hot rice up your rear-end...
He was against it, but now he's for it.
Who?
John Kerry, whose baffling explanation of votes on Iraq war funding hurt his 2004 White House bid, said... "I think we're in a very different situation."
I'm sure that clears up everything.
He was against it, but now he's for it.
=======
Well that was before he was against the spending for the war, then against the troops, for the troops, backstabbing the troops, then in support of being against the support for the against-the-troops movement and then again when he did support the anti-miltary support for the against-the-troops spending and then again for the......
.... until he's against it.
Well, there you have it folks...just like he said...He ISN'T voting for it.
And why, Mr. Kerry, are we in a "very different situation?" Because GW Bush whooped your butt and our military whooped Saddam's butt and keeps whoopin' terrorists' butts despite your irrelevant yammering.
You know why that is, don't you? They've had their heads up the butts for so long their brains are starved for oxygen.
IGNORE HIM!!!
He would have been President for less than four weeks, now. Exactly what miracles would he have accomplished during that period that would constitute "better progress"?
Who cares how he votes - we know he doesn't support the military. His anti-war activities have proven that.
If he wants to run again he HAS to vote for it.
"He would have been President for less than four weeks, now. Exactly what miracles would he have accomplished during that period that would constitute 'better progress'?"
Don't you know - he had a PLAN
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.