Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IE 7: so much for Firefox
CNET.com ^ | February 15, 2005 | Molly Wood

Posted on 02/16/2005 10:38:24 AM PST by decimon

The party's over.

In the past year, the little browser that could, Firefox, became the people's hero, an underdog warrior that took a huge swipe at its enemy, Internet Explorer. IE dipped below 90 percent market share for the first time in years, while Firefox lured users like the Pied Piper, blowing past its own fundraising goals and reigniting the browser wars.

Meanwhile, the bad news continued to mount for Microsoft. An IE exploit put even Windows XP SP2 users at risk from phishing schemes, even as Microsoft touted SP2 as the most secure version of Windows yet. Worse, major security companies and the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team began to recommend that computer users dump IE for something more secure (read: Firefox).

By early this year, Netscape was emboldened to reenter the fray, announcing in January that it would release a new version of the Netscape browser, designed specifically to resist phishing schemes--something even Firefox lacks. Then, Opera said it would offer free licenses to universities, in order to make sure it would still be relevant in the new world browser order. And through it all, what was the response from Microsoft? Silence.

TalkBack Are you afraid of a standalone Internet Explorer, or will you keep betting on the Firefox pony?

For a moment there, it looked like the tyrant IE could actually be overthrown. Those were heady days, weren't they? Well, they're over now. Papa Bill just dropped the hammer. Bill Gates announced this week, at the RSA Security Conference in San Francisco (of all places), that Microsoft will ship Internet Explorer 7, without waiting for the next version of Windows. Gates says the standalone browser is designed to address the perception that IE itself is a massive security risk. What he didn't say, but you know he was thinking it, is that IE 7 will easily put a stop to this upstart browser rebellion.

Don't believe me? You should. Firefox is great, I use it. But it's a chore sometimes, what with most sites using that pesky nonstandard IE code. Not everything renders properly, and some sites just plain don't work--I have to load up IE to use them. Plus, let's be honest--Firefox has its flaws. Why is there no way to check for updates from within the browser, for one thing? Why does it take so doggone long to launch? Why, why must it crash every single time I open a PDF? I mean, every single time. Opera, fine, whatever, I'm not paying for a browser, and for some reason, although I've tried it several times, it's just never captured me. It's too clunky, and I was raised on IE. I don't want to learn something completely new. IE, on the other hand, is like the sweeping tide--it's just easier not to fight it.

If a standalone IE 7 is even 50 percent more secure than current versions, the Firefox rebellion is finished. If IE 7 has tabs, Firefox will be destroyed as surely as the Hungarian uprising of 1956 was crushed by Russia. I use the analogy deliberately, too--no one expected Microsoft to issue a standalone version of IE, but those months of silence (and, no doubt, frantic development) look awfully ominous now. This is a company that's absorbed Justice Department lawsuits, threats of daily fines from the European Union, and lawsuits from nearly every state in the union, and that has steadfastly refused to break up its republic of Windows-IE-Windows Media. But this Firefox thing must have it fearing the domino effect, big time.

It was bad when Microsoft seemed to ignore Firefox, treating it like a harmless upstart not worthy of comment or attack. But now that the sleeping giant has awakened, I think the buzzing gnat of the browser wars is about to be squashed flat. What do you think?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: asshatauthor; browser; computersecurity; convictedmonopoly; drang; firefox; internetexploiter; kneepadder; microsoft; redmondshill; sturm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-157 next last
Maybe Molly Wood but would you?
1 posted on 02/16/2005 10:38:24 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon
that pesky nonstandard IE code

More like IE is a pesky nonstandard browser.

2 posted on 02/16/2005 10:40:55 AM PST by anonymous_user (Not everything's a conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Meta-Ping.


3 posted on 02/16/2005 10:41:47 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I for one have not jumped on the Firefox band wagon and I can not wait for IE 7.


4 posted on 02/16/2005 10:41:56 AM PST by since1868
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

Browser update ping!


5 posted on 02/16/2005 10:42:30 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Man alive, she's sure not a company shill. No way. Really.

I bet she doesn't even own stock.

/sarcasm OFF

Never goin' back to IE. I hate it.


6 posted on 02/16/2005 10:43:07 AM PST by dandelion (http://thequestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I prefer Firefox, and I've not experienced any of the problems mentioned. It starts up fine, and it stops almost all spyware, and I just find it a pleasure to use.


7 posted on 02/16/2005 10:43:09 AM PST by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
R.I.P. Microsoft.
8 posted on 02/16/2005 10:43:16 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
IE dipped below 90 percent

Give me a break.. Netscape owned the market for a while, then IE came out embedded in the OS - thats why they took over. If they are still just under 90% they should be jumping for joy.

If IE7 is good, i will use it. But right now i use firefox for the speed. IE just slows down the internet for me.
9 posted on 02/16/2005 10:43:48 AM PST by Next_Time_NJ (NJ demorat exterminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"Not everything renders properly, and some sites just plain don't work-"

Since installing FireFox I found that sites that didn't work were not only NOT missed, but I also avoided the troublesome parasites thaat sometimes came with accessing them.

POP UP and VIRUS free for 8 months now. AND COUNTING!

10 posted on 02/16/2005 10:44:05 AM PST by Baynative (Liberals are proof that not everything in nature has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

When is its release? I prefer IE over Firefox but security and options on IE sux.


11 posted on 02/16/2005 10:44:51 AM PST by Porterville (Down with politicians.... Down with Judicial Fiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I do like Firefox :) I use it here at Work on my Sun box, at home on my Mac (Mac OSX and Linux). An additional item, it blocks pop-up ads and for banner ads, right click your mouse over the ad and tell it to block images especially from sites like doubleclick.net.
12 posted on 02/16/2005 10:45:51 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandelion

No matter what they do to IE I will never use it again. MS was wayyyy to slow in addressing the issues. For that alone they can stuff IE.


13 posted on 02/16/2005 10:46:50 AM PST by LilyBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

IE7 beta is due sometime this summer.

Meaning, a final release won't happen until fall at the earliest. We'll have Firefox 1.1, and possibly 1.2 then.


14 posted on 02/16/2005 10:47:11 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

LOL ok..

As long as they control the OS market, they are going up up up. You think some company is going to come by and just create some awsome OS thats going to take windows? They tried, and they are trying. They give them away for free (windows based linux systems) and they do nothing. So lets think about this.. windows based FREE OS vs $100-$200.00 OS.. and the free types just bomb.

MS will own this market for a very very long time. As they buy up more companies (virus, spyare, etc) and spread into new forms of the market (i.e Microsoft Home) it will only grow.


15 posted on 02/16/2005 10:47:12 AM PST by Next_Time_NJ (NJ demorat exterminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I tried Firefox for awhile but there were websites it couldn't support. Now I'm with Netscape but don't like it either. I'm waiting for IE 7 too.


16 posted on 02/16/2005 10:47:25 AM PST by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
You'd have to pay me (and purchase a new computer as well) to get me to use IE ever again. Since i moved to FireFox i have not experienced ONE spyware or such. I even thought my anti-spyware programs were not working or something. With IE there was always a case of spyware-flu, even though i am one of the more paranoid internet users out there! I just couldn't avoid the stuff with IE.

So, if IE7 is what they claim it is then good for them. But one thing i know for sure is i will not even download the sucker let alone use it.

17 posted on 02/16/2005 10:47:27 AM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Firefox is ...a chore sometimes, what with most sites using that pesky nonstandard IE code. Not everything renders properly, and some sites just plain don't work--I have to load up IE to use them. ....I don't want to learn something completely new.

There y'go.

Avant Browser does it for me.

Dan

18 posted on 02/16/2005 10:47:31 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Tried the Fox, came back to IE.

I think she has a point,but there will always be some who think outside of MS and carry it like a Roman Shield of defiance.

That won't be going away, ever......

19 posted on 02/16/2005 10:48:01 AM PST by Cold Heat (What are fears but voices awry?Whispering harm where harm is not and deluding the unwary. Wordsworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Opera user here. I never had a single problem that this author talked about when switching over.

Here's a question, though. If M$ is releasing a "stand alone" browser, does that mean it's not embedded in the OS? What will happen to M$ defense strategy?


20 posted on 02/16/2005 10:49:03 AM PST by Frank L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I'm glad Microsoft is finally being forced to compete again.

However, I get the feeling IE7 will be little more than a superficial update. It won't implement standards control (because 90% of the Internet and most corporate networks would break), it won't even add new stuff that wouldn't break the old stuff (you know, like CSS2), and it won't really improve security.

But you can be sure it'll feature tabs and themes!


21 posted on 02/16/2005 10:49:10 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

And how do the prices compare?


22 posted on 02/16/2005 10:49:18 AM PST by Manic_Episode (An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

if it has 90% of the users - it's not nonstandard, it IS the standard.


23 posted on 02/16/2005 10:49:26 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon

What's IE?


24 posted on 02/16/2005 10:49:34 AM PST by G.Mason (The replies by this poster are meant for self amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Next_Time_NJ
The problem for Microsoft is not Linux, it is virtual desktops residing on the Internet.

Soon you will be able to login to your personal virtual PC from any Internet access point.

The paradigm is shifting under Bill's feet at this very moment.

26 posted on 02/16/2005 10:50:39 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

Laziness--the single biggest contributor to Internet Explorer's marketshare.


27 posted on 02/16/2005 10:50:57 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Maigret
I prefer Firefox, and I've not experienced any of the problems mentioned.

I'm using 1.0 and like it but it does lock me up now and then. And possibly causes me to run low on "resources" after prolonged use. I'm sure that Windows ME has nothing to do with the problems. ;-)

28 posted on 02/16/2005 10:51:08 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: decimon
. What do you think?

I think, based upon their history, that they won't release it for Win9x users, so it won't matter to me one way or the other.

29 posted on 02/16/2005 10:51:27 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

The reason that many websites don't "support" Firefox, is that IE is much more forgiving of mistakes in HTML and CSS, than Firefox is. Web developers need to validate their CSS files, just because it runs on IE, doesn't mean it's well-formed.


30 posted on 02/16/2005 10:51:44 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Shylent

Ditto -- and Opera had those ads. Avant simply rocks.

Dan


31 posted on 02/16/2005 10:51:53 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
What's IE?

Microsoftese for "Income Engine."

32 posted on 02/16/2005 10:53:08 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

<< Laziness--the single biggest contributor to Internet Explorer's marketshare. >>

You know... you're right! These applications which actually do a good job for us, without making us spend extra hours of work learning how to use them, are BAD! It's EVIL to be able to use something easily, comfortably, successfully! Internet browsing should HURT! If possible, it should cause us to SHED BLOOD!

I'm ditching my Avant right now, for the most obscure little 3-bit Malaysian browser program I can find! But only if it's all in Malaysian!

< / friendly s >

Dan


33 posted on 02/16/2005 10:54:11 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: decimon

ping for later


34 posted on 02/16/2005 10:54:31 AM PST by Phsstpok ("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Isn't that the same dream Sun was peddling a decade ago? The network IS the computer and diskless workstations? It went over like the Kerry Campaign. People like to use their 3GZ machines for their apps and I/O.


35 posted on 02/16/2005 10:55:01 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ
then IE came out embedded in the OS - thats why they took over

That's not really technically accurate. You were not forced to use it. The proper phrase was that MS gave you, free of charge, IE when you bought the operating system. Embedded is a BS statement used during the Clintoon administration. You could have downloaded and used Netscape anytime you wanted to. Just as you can now with Firefox or any other browser.
36 posted on 02/16/2005 10:55:43 AM PST by ProudVet77 (rabid, right wing attack dog blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: decimon

IE having tabbed browsing and other Firefox features?

I seem to remember the MS cheerleaders here saying that OSS doesn't innovate, only copy proprietary software. Well lookee here....


37 posted on 02/16/2005 10:57:42 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

Yep, I've been using Netscape/Mozilla since Netscape 1...no matter what system I've had.


38 posted on 02/16/2005 10:58:37 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Maigret

"I prefer Firefox, and I've not experienced any of the problems mentioned. It starts up fine, and it stops almost all spyware, and I just find it a pleasure to use."

Ditto to all that! Plus, IE7 will still be Microsoft and most hackers will still direct their attention to bringing down the evil Bill Gates. There is nothing in this article which suggesst that it will be more secure than current versions.


39 posted on 02/16/2005 10:59:16 AM PST by Socratic (Ignorant and free? It's not to be. - T. Jefferson (paraphrase))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
But it's a chore sometimes, what with most sites using that pesky nonstandard IE code. Not everything renders properly, and some sites just plain don't work--I have to load up IE to use them. Plus, let's be honest--Firefox has its flaws. Why is there no way to check for updates from within the browser, for one thing? Why does it take so doggone long to launch? Why, why must it crash every single time I open a PDF? I mean, every single time.

I've been using Firefox for months now and I've not run into these problems that this woman obviously has. You can check for updates within the browser. She makes it sound like it takes forever for it to launch when it takes about as long to load as IE or Netscape. And I've never had a problem with it crashing "every single time" when opening a PDF file. Firefox is great because it isn't nearly as vunerable to spyware, adware or overall CRAPware as IE. It isn't perfect but I expect it to get better and better. I may get IE7, just to check it out but it will probably be dogged with the same problems that cause me to use Firefox in the first place.

40 posted on 02/16/2005 11:00:11 AM PST by Sister_T (Those who preach tolerance and love, practice it THE LEAST!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
Embedded is a BS statement used during the Clintoon administration.

You are incorrect. Go to "My Computer" and type in a www address. You will connect. The file manager uses IE code. That means that IE is embedded.

41 posted on 02/16/2005 11:01:05 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck
An additional item, it blocks pop-up ads and for banner ads, right click your mouse over the ad and tell it to block images especially from sites like doubleclick.net.

This is the best feature.

42 posted on 02/16/2005 11:01:28 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Yep, I've been using Netscape/Mozilla since Netscape 1...no matter what system I've had.

Which is cool. I used to prefer Netscape myself, but finally chose IE. But I still try other browsers.
43 posted on 02/16/2005 11:01:42 AM PST by ProudVet77 (rabid, right wing attack dog blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77

I'm a tab junkie and I hate MS's approach to email. Mozilla just does it for me.


44 posted on 02/16/2005 11:03:01 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Thanks. Informative.


45 posted on 02/16/2005 11:03:29 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
Isn't that the same dream Sun was peddling a decade ago? The network IS the computer and diskless workstations? It went over like the Kerry Campaign. People like to use their 3GZ machines for their apps and I/O.

A decade ago there was no Internet.

Now everybody is on it, and 10% of them are on it on their cell phones.

The times they are a-changing. Bill is a good adopter of other people's technology and dictator, but he never was an innovator.

46 posted on 02/16/2005 11:06:10 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
That's cool. But the beauty is that you are free to choose, and get any browser for free :)
It's like seach engines. We all have choices. I like altavista, others like google, others like MSN etc. Just keep the feds out of it and it will always be free!
47 posted on 02/16/2005 11:06:39 AM PST by ProudVet77 (rabid, right wing attack dog blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dandelion

> Man alive, she's sure not a company shill. No way. Really.

And such a good writer, too :-)

--Bill, happy Firefox user


48 posted on 02/16/2005 11:07:08 AM PST by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Socratic

Double dittos.

I said last fall I wouldn't fix anyone's PC for free anymore unless they use Firefox. They all started using it, and I haven't had to help them at all!

It's so simple, my mother installed and customized it just the way she likes it on her own. That was 6 months ago. Not a single instance of the usual spyware since.

FireFox Rocks. : )


49 posted on 02/16/2005 11:10:05 AM PST by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: since1868
I for one have not jumped on the Firefox band wagon and I can not wait for IE 7.

Well you can thank those of us who did switch to Firefox and lit a fire under Bill Gates' lazy ass. Otherwise IE 7 would still be on the drawing board and we'd all be dealing with those stupid pop-ups and viruses for years to come.

I'll gladly switch back to IE if IE 7 is as good as this article states. Firefox is superior to IE 6 but it's far from perfect.

50 posted on 02/16/2005 11:10:31 AM PST by SamAdams76 (Earth is just a prison for intergalactic riff-raff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson