Posted on 02/16/2005 11:43:43 AM PST by Cableguy
One bright spot in an otherwise fraught week was on NPR's Fresh Air.
On Thursday, Feb. 10, Terry Gross interviewed Lynn Cheney, author, conservative and wife of the vice president.
Mrs. Cheney was there in part to talk about a history book she has authored. She spoke about how Americans should have a better sense of their own history, the story of America is one of progress and freedom, and she spoke about how Americans should take pride in the accomplishments of the country. The interview also covered her critique of how history is taught, the influence of the women's movement on her own life and career, and what it was like to grow up in a small Wyoming town.
Some listeners did complain, though. When Terry Gross moved the interview to conservative positions on gay rights, listener Doug Jorrey wrote:
It was very clear to me that Ms. Gross had an agenda for the interview that was much different than what was promised. Her comment to Mrs. Cheney that "I know you don't like to talk specifically about your daughter's sexuality BUT..."' was typical ambush journalism. I found this and other attempts to pull Mrs. Cheney (out) of the closet on gays and faith to be childish and far beyond the scope of the promised discussion. Does Ms. Gross always do this with folks she doesn't agree with? It's poor journalism, and probably the reason why I don't often listen to Fresh Air.
Tough, But Respectful
A few listeners, such as Dulce McLeod, disagreed and thought it was a tough but respectful interview with a very articulate spokesperson for the conservative side:
Terry Gross is the type of interviewer that asks the right questions. It is sometimes uncomfortable to hear them but appreciate her spunk.
Danny Miller is the executive producer of Fresh Air:
It was frankly not surprising that Ms. Cheney was less enthusiastic discussing other topics in the news (in particular: the call for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, how that issue impacted on the election, and the Buster controversy). While we respect Ms. Cheney's desire for privacy specifically in regard to her daughter Mary (no questions were asked about her), that doesn't mean that the entire topic of gay rights and gay marriage was off the table. Many Americans are interested in what a public figure with Ms. Cheney's influence would have to say on these topics, especially given the fact that one of her children is gay. And for the record, our producer Amy Salit made it clear over the course of several phone calls with Lynne Cheney's office that we would talk about her children's book, but that other issues would be covered as well.
I also thought there were moments when Terry Gross was too persistent in her questioning of Mrs. Cheney. But overall, I thought it was a model of how good public radio interviews can be when people in the public spotlight need to be held to account.
Unlike Bill O'Reilly in a Fresh Air interview some months ago, Mrs. Cheney did not run away. She stood her ground, and so did Terry Gross. It was tough and nobody blinked.
That accounts for the tension many listeners felt during the 38-minute interview.
I felt it, too, but I couldn't stop listening.
Good job.
Please shut down NPR -- as a taxpayer, I am tired of paying for socialist radio.
And just what is it that Mrs. Cheney is supposed to be held to account about? Terry Gross is insufferable.
"Unlike Bill O'Reilly in a Fresh Air interview some months ago, Mrs. Cheney did not run away."
Cheap Shot Award.
NPR. . .what morons.
"held to account" - or just plain "bashing-journalism" - this was supposed to be about her book - not a rehash of 'Bushwhacking.
Defund NPR!
Terry Gross has the personality of cow's cud!
Didn't Terry Gross get censured by NPR for her interview of O'Reilly?
Gross vs. O'Reilly: Culture Clash on NPR
By Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
Ombudsman
National Public Radio
On October 9, Terry Gross, longtime host of NPR's Fresh Air aired her interview with populist political talk show host Bill O'Reilly. The e-mails and phone calls of outrage are still arriving.
The interview was taped the day before on October 8. The ostensible reason was to talk about O'Reilly's latest book, Who's Looking Out For You? The book is about, among other things, the claim that America is in the midst of what O'Reilly calls a "cultural war between left and right." And he says the battle is being fought in bookstores by pitting sales of his book against those by liberals.
'Openly Hostile!'
In the Fresh Air interview, the tone was intense from the beginning. By the end of the interview, O'Reilly said he found Gross' line of questioning objectionable and hostile. He walked out of the interview, but not before he accused Gross of conducting the interview "in attack mode" and "full of typical NPR liberal bias." He also told her to "find another line of work."
Knowing that the interview would air the next day, O'Reilly used his October 8 television program to alert his viewers about what would happen the next day on NPR (Bill O'Reilly's Web site).
Here is the interview as it aired on NPR's Fresh Air.
As Gross mentioned in the interview, Bill O'Reilly was invited on Fresh Air in part because of his new book. She began by asking O'Reilly to respond to accusations made against him in a book by Al Franken, the politically liberal comedian. Franken's book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, is devoted in part to going after O'Reilly's credibility and his conservative opinions. In his book and on Fresh Air, Franken accuses O'Reilly of mistakes, distortions and outright lies.
Gross interviewed Franken two weeks previously on her program.
For some listeners, the interview with O'Reilly was a continuation of Franken's anti-conservative and anti-O'Reilly attacks.
'Biased and Prejudicial... '
Listener Michael Moritz's e-mail was typical of the more restrained comments:
NPR, you're not going to like this, but I have to say that O'Reilly... was correct: throughout the first 50 minutes of the interview, Terry Gross was clearly focused on discussing the popular left-wing (mis)perception of O'Reilly, misguided though it is, and not substantively dealing with his new book. I thought her interview was extremely biased and prejudicial. I was very disappointed with her transparently obvious agenda -- she's usually much more capable.
From Daniel Kennedy:
Terry needs to apologize to Bill for that interview. She's a much better interviewer than what I just heard from her. I was embarrassed for her. Bill worked up a real head of steam at the end, but he had taken it for long enough. We never did really hear about his book... P.S. I like BOTH of their shows and listen/watch when I get a chance.
'Bullying... hostility'
Robert Black was one of the few who thought Terry Gross' interview worked:
Thank you for the excellent O'Reilly interview. He quickly demonstrated his bullying tactics and hostility, proving himself to be an ass.
In my opinion, Terry Gross did a very tough interview. It was quite unlike many interviews on NPR where the tone is civil but often unchallenging of the guest.
Danny Miller is the executive producer of Fresh Air. I asked him if he thought the critics have a point:
Terry was tough on O'Reilly, not unfair. And I think O'Reilly drove the interview directly towards the conclusion he was hoping for. He was looking to butt heads. He's obviously still really steamed that the case against Franken was thrown out of court -- and came to our interview with the expressed goal of demonstrating his belief that NPR has a liberal bias, and that Fresh Air (like Franken) was out to defame him. On his own show he said: "I'll go on this program [Fresh Air] just to show you what they do, to expose what they do. Cause I knew what was going to happen... " It's pretty difficult to for an interviewer to maintain a high level of rapport with someone who wants to prove that you're out to get them.
O'Reilly is one of the most controversial and powerful broadcasters in the country -- Terry asked him about how he uses that power to pursue issues, and settle scores with his critics. Terry wouldn't have been doing her job if she didn't address that (which is why she brought up the Janet Maslin and People magazine pieces). And O'Reilly is smart enough to know it.
Even so, I agree with the listeners who complained about the tone of the interview: Her questions were pointed from the beginning. She went after O'Reilly using critical quotes from the Franken book and a New York Times book review. That put O'Reilly at his most prickly and defensive mode, and Gross was never able to get him back into the interview in an effective way. This was surprising because Terry Gross is, in my opinion, one of the best interviewers anywhere in American journalism.
Although O'Reilly frequently resorts to bluster and bullying on his own show, he seemed unable to take her tough questions. He became angrier as the interview went along. But by coming across as a pro-Franken partisan rather than a neutral and curious journalist, Gross did almost nothing that might have allowed the interview to develop.
By the time the interview was about halfway through, it felt as though Terry Gross was indeed "carrying Al Franken's water," as some listeners say. It was not about O'Reilly's ideas, or his attitudes or even about his book. It was about O'Reilly as political media phenomenon. That's a legitimate subject for discussion, but in this case, it was an interview that was, in the end, unfair to O'Reilly.
The "Empty Chair" Interview
Finally, an aspect of the interview that I found particularly disturbing: It happened when Terry Gross was about to read a criticism of Bill O'Reilly's book from People magazine. Before Gross could read it to him for his reaction, O'Reilly ended the interview and walked out of the studio. She read the quote anyway.
That was wrong. O'Reilly was not there to respond. It's known in broadcasting as the "empty chair" interview, and it is considered an unethical technique and should not be used on NPR.
I believe the listeners were not well served by this interview. It may have illustrated the "cultural wars" that seem to be flaring in the country. Unfortunately, the interview only served to confirm the belief, held by some, in NPR's liberal media bias.
It left the impression that there was something not quite right about the reasons behind this program: Bill O'Reilly often loves to use NPR as his own personal political piñata; and NPR keeps helping him by inviting him to appear.
A letter to Terry Gross from Prof. Rosa Maria Pegueros summed it up well:
I have been enjoying and learning from your show for more years than I can count, but I have to make one small criticism. Please consider it a word from a friend.
I was astonished that you had Fox's Bill O'Reilly on. I have never been able to tolerate more than a few moments of his programs. Having had a few students who came in quoting him and putting his opinions in their papers, I do know his opinions, but all his on-air shouting is unsupportable. That being said, I really think you were baiting him. Not that what you were saying was wrong or inaccurate but I had to wonder what possessed you to choose him? I guess one could say that he walked into enemy territory but I think it couldn't end any other way. Either you were going to corner him and make him admit the things that have been written about him or he was going to walk out once he realized what you were doing. I heard you do something similar with Gene Simmons. I can't believe that you didn't know how he'd react to your questions.
These louts and loudmouths deserve being embarrassed in public, I guess. But to hear you do it is somewhat unsettling. I would expect that if YOU ever went on his program, he'd do something similar to you. I guess what I'm saying is that I expect them to be that way and am generally glad that you aren't.
Listeners can contact me at 202-513-3245 or by email at ombudsman@npr.org.
Jeffrey Dvorkin
NPR Ombudsman
It wasn't that long ago when R Kroc's widow left NPR over $200 million:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1494600
They endowed most of it, which makes sense. But their continual cries of poverty don't move me. Didn't before, surely don't now, and makes me wonder why they need continued govt support.
Translation:
we're right, you're wrong, that's all...mmkay?
"I know you don't like to talk specifically about your daughter's sexuality BUT...
in regard to her daughter Mary (no questions were asked about her)
Translation:
you are not hearing what you think you hear. Please ignore the man behind the curtain. Nothing to see here.
Has NPR ever gone a day without mention gay this or gay that?
"Please shut down NPR -- as a taxpayer, I am tired of paying for socialist radio."
Shut everything down but CarTalk. I like that. And the blues hour. That's good too. And Echos. Talk of the Nation isn't bad, and even Prairie Home Companion can be stomached from time to time. It's Only a Game is good to listen to on the way to the golf course on Saturday mornings. The thing about NPR is that they don't try to hide their liberal bent. And they don't pretend to be unbiased or middle of the road. What you hear is what you get. Unlike CBS and the other MSM networks that pretend to be something they are not. But they don't need our tax money anymore, that's for sure.
a model of how good public radio interviews can be when people in the public spotlight need to be held to account.
Hold her to account for her book (but I bet the facts are immaculate) but I don't see where she should be held to account for having a lesbian daughter.
This kind of crappola from the left continous to hack me off.
Shut all the govt funding down.
If those shows are good enough to stand on their own, they would get the ratings and would get advertiser support. I shouldn't have to subsidize a show just because you or anyone else likes it.
Did you read the last sentence in my post?
Has NPR ever gone a day without implying how wonderful transsexual adventures are? Transmen, indeed. Or is it transpeople? I can't keep up with the Orwellspeak. I don't keep up, so the transsexual agenda may only be goosed once a week or so. I'd love to have the stats!
That's lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender/questioning, mister. Please try to keep up.
Absolutely correct but unfortunately that does not attract viewers/listeners the majority of people watch a TV or listen to a radio interview not for the educational content but in case something juicy gets asked.
Lynne Cheney a smart attractive classy lady
I used to really get sick to my stomach when that battleaxe, Susan Stanberg(?) was there. 'Whatta nest of 'stinkin socialists!
There is absolutely no justification for the government to fund some content at the expense of other content and stations. No justification for funding NPR/PBS/NEA. I haven't even gotten disagreement from my left-wing freinds on this point.
Does Terry Gross have a personal interest in issues gay?
I think she may. But who can say?
(steely)
She might be a lesbian herself. I really don't know. But I do know she has a very liberal agenda, and spent 50% of the interview questioning Lynn Cheney about various gay issues.
And just what is it that Mrs. Cheney is supposed to be held to account about?
My first thought !
An apt last name.
I wonder if they asked her about her earlier novel "Sisters"?
Terry Gross asked her about her earlier book. I don't remember the title. Gross claimed that it had a lesbian character. Cheney said Gross was wrong. Gross spent 50% of the interview trying to get Cheney to admit that GOP has an anti-homosexual agenda.
so, for you, before you complain and start whinning, do your research, homeworks and say something meaningful.
====
NICE TRY - done like a good liberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.