Skip to comments.
Clashes with Churchill found
Denver Post ^
| 02/17/05
| Arthur Kane
Posted on 02/17/2005 9:17:59 AM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
02/17/2005 9:17:59 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
David Lane, a Denver lawyer representing Churchill, dismissed any claims of wrongdoing by his client. "Obviously, the police didn't get involved ... and I doubt anything happened," Lane said. A non-denial denial - Clinton level quality.
2
posted on
02/17/2005 9:21:23 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: Pikamax
"Maybe she needed to be physically attacked," he said. "Maybe his wife acted in self-defense. Maybe she needed to be spit on." Say what?!?
3
posted on
02/17/2005 9:21:54 AM PST
by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
To: Pikamax
Sounds like they're getting the ammunition they need to get rid of him.
4
posted on
02/17/2005 9:22:24 AM PST
by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: Pikamax
This guy should never be allowed to hide behind the first amendment. Just a thug.
To: prion
Drug-addled gibberish. Lawyers.
6
posted on
02/17/2005 9:23:49 AM PST
by
stan the beaver
(We will kill the ones who eat us, and eat the ones we kill!!)
To: Pikamax
despite never going through the normal review Some Post reporters need to dig a little here.
To: formercalifornian
Hey Churhill....where's your Master thesis....care to post it...........?
8
posted on
02/17/2005 9:25:29 AM PST
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: Pikamax
And colleges and universities all over America are just loaded with these Commie lowlifes...
While our children are being indoctrinated by them...at our expense!
9
posted on
02/17/2005 9:25:47 AM PST
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: Pikamax
"Maybe she needed to be physically attacked," he said. "Maybe his wife acted in self-defense. Maybe she needed to be spit on." Dirty Lawyer.
To: Pikamax; Americanwolf
"Maybe she needed to be physically attacked," he said. "Maybe his wife acted in self-defense. Maybe she needed to be spit on." This is a lawyer saying this. Bet he would sue me into the ground if I spit on his client (who I feel deserves to be spit on).
11
posted on
02/17/2005 9:26:15 AM PST
by
Americanwolfsbrother
(Arizona Population: 6 million; 4 million residents and 2 million invaders.)
To: Americanwolfsbrother
To: spokeshave
And while you're at it, there's a little oversight here. Just sign this little oath that we missed -- don't know how we forgot this little detail -- and things will be just fine.
To: prion
someone needs to send that quote to the colorado Bar
To: formercalifornian; Americanwolf
He'll never sign it. He told a group of students about two weeks ago he doesn't work for the University or the state but for them. I only hope the University realizes he is not on payroll and stops issuing his paychecks!
15
posted on
02/17/2005 9:29:23 AM PST
by
Americanwolfsbrother
(Arizona Population: 6 million; 4 million residents and 2 million invaders.)
To: Americanwolfsbrother
Of course not. Then they can fire him for subordination, but all the lefties would scream, "McCarthyism" and it would be a great show.
To: Walkingfeather
I just did. I forwarded the whole article to their disciplinary committee.
17
posted on
02/17/2005 9:33:52 AM PST
by
Chef Dajuan
(this ain't rocket science, you know. so use your knob! -emeril lagasse)
To: Americanwolfsbrother
Well, he's no doubt a drug-addled radical lawyer who needs to be spit on himself. We should be grateful that this Churchill clown is being represented by people like this. The lawyer falls into the same category of ethical dilemna which "Mental Ward" represents:
What do you do with someone who ain't worth livin' and ain't worth killin' either?
To: Pikamax
Churchill was required to sign an oath pledging to "support the constitutions of the United States and Colorado" as a condition of employment, the university has not been able to find a signed copy
As a land-grant university (and I assume UC is) and considering that the program under which Churchill was hired was probably a Federally funded program, his signing an oath would have been automatic and mandatory.
I'm beginning to wonder whether Churchill has a silent history of strong-arming and intimidating and bullying to get his tenure. He seemed to have had the propensity, based on some of the AIM activities, etc.
19
posted on
02/17/2005 9:34:42 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: Emmett McCarthy
Give 'em their own show on MSNBC
No one watches that channel, lol!
20
posted on
02/17/2005 9:35:35 AM PST
by
Chef Dajuan
(this ain't rocket science, you know. so use your knob! -emeril lagasse)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson