"Jeff is a good guy. This the media trying to lynch someone because he writes for an conservative internet publication."
He very well may be a good guy. However, there are lots of people who write for conservative internet publications. What made them decide to focus on him? Do you really want to be shilling for the guy described in this article?
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/man-called-jeff.html
I can see both sides of this issue.
On the one hand, I don't like the idea of the MSM going after conservative journalists when they can't be bothered to demand that Kerry release his military records. On the other hand, didn't conservatives say, during the Clinton years, that character matters?
I'm going through a similar issue with my father's care-giver. Suffice it to say that he is probably having an affair. He has repeatedly asked for money. We have recently found out that he has a misdemeanor battery conviction. He's a really nice guy--my dad loves him. However, he also does the bare minimum for my dad; he basically sits talking on his cell phone all day long. Can you really separate out the private from the public persona? Maybe to some degree, but ultimately, it catches up with you.
So, with all due respect for everything that you do, Kristinn, the analysis in the link that ClintonBeGone posted in #42 has really swayed me. How in the world was this guy approved to be in the press pool?