Skip to comments.
The Marxist Roots of Democrat Obstructionist Tactics
THE RANT.US ^
| FEBRUARY 18, 2005
| GREG LEWIS
Posted on 02/18/2005 11:07:59 AM PST by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: cricket
liberal Democrats are no less dangerous to the freedom that we continue to enjoy than are Islamist terrorists. " Have often wondered if President Bush sees this warning, as clearly
Oh yes. This infiltration, usurpation of the dem party by the socialist/Marxist has been going on for 25+years. And TeddyBoy is the puppet leader. Don't forget Daddy Bush was, among other things, head of CIA...they know where the bear does his doody in the buckwheat.
I have always suspicioned that the "Western White House" was built on the ranch - in the middle of thousands of wide open acres - for total security from any kind of listening "bugs" - which any place in DC, even the WH, could be seeded with. "W" conducts a lot of business with both his cabinet members and world leaders there - far from interference of any kind. I believe it drives the libs mad...and they try to denigrate it by always referring to him, when there, as "on vacation again"
21
posted on
02/18/2005 12:24:01 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
(."...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: maine-iac7
"Don't forget Daddy Bush was, among other things, head of CIA...they know where the bear does his doody in the buckwheat."
Well, I feel better knowing that for sure. . .LOL!
22
posted on
02/18/2005 12:38:01 PM PST
by
cricket
(Just say - NO U.N.)
To: ken21
dumb? probably not. Hillary's not.
But below expectations? Apparently.
23
posted on
02/18/2005 12:50:07 PM PST
by
twigs
To: CHARLITE
As their relentless efforts to undermine the policies and principles that form the foundation of our nations democratic institutions demonstrate, leftist Democrats...seek the same end: the destruction of western democratic capitalism. Works with Occams Razor . One explanation for a disparate collection of seemingly contradictory policies that otherwise require multiple different explanations.
24
posted on
02/18/2005 12:50:34 PM PST
by
Plutarch
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: All
In other words, to put Critical Theory into practice, all one needs to do is . . . well, criticize. Carp. Gainsay. Denigrate. Find fault. . .In true adherence to one of the fundamental components of the Marxist approach to bringing down western capitalism. . . . As David Horowitz put it, the "issue" is not the issue. It is so maddening to see conservatives spend days -- weeks, months -- defending against an "issue." All the while the left has moved on and busied itself by littering discourse with tens -- hundreds -- of "issues du jour."
The issue is not the issue but THE ISSUE for the ilk of the fat drunk though may not be "bringing down western capitalism" but it certainly is to pester and fluster and bring down any opposition.
The best response to "issues" is, "Screw you and the MSM you rode in on."
26
posted on
02/18/2005 1:37:43 PM PST
by
WilliamofCarmichael
(MSM Fraudcasters are skid marks on journalism's clean shorts.)
To: AmericanArchConservative; jan in Colorado; Former Dodger; USF; TexasCowboy
Absolutely spot on! Bush-hate is a smokescreen for the Marxist ideology that seeks to brainwash starting with the youth of America--in those cesspools of communism known as academia. It is time-worn tactic.
27
posted on
02/18/2005 5:13:16 PM PST
by
ariamne
(reformed liberal--Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
To: ken21
You are correct ... Rush noted during one of his Friday programs that he had obtained a copy of Hillary's senior paper, and that he would comment on after reading it over the coming weekend ...
Monday and nothing ... Tuesday and nothing ... not a peek since.
28
posted on
02/19/2005 7:50:46 AM PST
by
jamaksin
To: jamaksin
thanks.
out of curiosity i'd like to read it.
29
posted on
02/19/2005 9:30:11 AM PST
by
ken21
(the terrorists didn't blow up the new york times because the times supports them. (/s))
To: jamaksin
thanks.
out of curiosity i'd like to read it.
30
posted on
02/19/2005 9:33:19 AM PST
by
ken21
(the terrorists didn't blow up the new york times because the times supports them. (/s))
To: riri
31
posted on
02/19/2005 9:35:16 AM PST
by
riri
To: CHARLITE
Excellent article! It has been clear for decades now the the Commiecrat party is the new home of the Bolshevik party. While conservatives are labeled as NeocoNs, Commiecrats should be labeled as NeocoMs.
32
posted on
02/19/2005 9:42:45 AM PST
by
Visalia
To: CHARLITE
Good article, but the author needs an editor to help him cut the size of his sentences, while keeping the intent of the sentence pure (without diluting the author's original thought) and keep the author more focused on the main thrust of the subject (while not disconcerting him in anyway) so that the reader of the article can be persuasivly brought to the author's point of view (without beating the reader over the head with long and almost unreadable sentences with too many(...),[,,,,,] and "...."'s......to the point of suicide by said reader, who in my case, almost did kill myself reading this piece, because it's basis is true and I agree with almost all he stated, but none the less, I'm tired now.
FMCDH(BITS)
33
posted on
02/19/2005 5:26:46 PM PST
by
nothingnew
(There are two kinds of people; Decent and indecent.)
To: CHARLITE
Thank you very much for the link...I visited the website and found some really awesome links, articles, etc..Thanks again.
34
posted on
05/12/2007 12:02:12 AM PDT
by
BlueZeus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson