Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MD4BUSH...Who Are You? [O'Malley - Democrat sleaze]
WBAL ^ | February 15, 2005 | Chip Franklin

Posted on 02/19/2005 1:53:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-236 next last
To: Jim Robinson

The same could be said of the Liberal Government of Canada.

Except our evil, lying, liberals are in charge of us right now.

God Bless President Bush, and you, Jim.

61 posted on 02/19/2005 2:45:47 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01
You make an excellent point. I just forwarded your observation to Jervis Finney, Chief Counsel to Governor Ehrlich, who is investigating this matter. I trust that Finney will take note of the information; I've known the gentleman (slightly) since 1960.

Billybob
62 posted on 02/19/2005 2:46:39 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Judges who disobey the law are the worst criminals of all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

They may be cryptically clever, but they don't have the good common sense and analytical ability of Freepers on a mission.

As I see it - THE MISSION is to stand by our forum - and resist any effort to intimidate us and our right to open, free and enlightened discussion...without fear of oppression and the PC police.

God bless you Jim - bet your Mom never had to say "IntegrityX3"

hf


63 posted on 02/19/2005 2:51:55 PM PST by highflight (from a distance - buzzards might appear as eagles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Yeah, this one stinks like roadkill in August. The question, though, is just exactly who are they trying to discredit here? Who are the Democrats trying to tarnish with this? The bloggers in general? Free Republic specifically? The MD state house? Who?

So long as it gives them "victimhood cover", that is all they care about. Dems only love people who cover up and never do anything else. It is their sole expenditure. They have become a virtual party, a nothing, a looks only, which kills for looks.

64 posted on 02/19/2005 2:52:31 PM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

ping for later


65 posted on 02/19/2005 2:53:06 PM PST by jan in Colorado (The ACLU...promoting the leftist, liberal ,secularist agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deadhead

mosk, WaPo what about Snyder?


66 posted on 02/19/2005 2:54:12 PM PST by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
I am very disappointed in the sloppy journalism that's out there

LOL!

I am very disappointed in the sloppy journalism that's out there and feel it is our duty to point out factual errors

Ride on Quixote!

67 posted on 02/19/2005 2:59:56 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I don't think the general public would understand "freepmail".

I think they would. It's like an internal memo service, a "house phone" if you will.

It's not like we can 'chat' anywhere on FR in "private". We 'chat' in the forums, and the forums are public.

68 posted on 02/19/2005 3:02:06 PM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I believe the "MD" in "MD4Bush" stands for Maryland. Also believe the "4Bush" part is 180 (or 360 as one prominent Democrat once stated) degrees out of whack. I also have no doubt that one or more reporters were in on the set up. Sorry to be so reluctant to name names... waiting on the legalities.

Man I'll just have to ROTFL if those amateur wannabe saboteurs forgot the simple step of not covering their internet tracks. I love technology!

69 posted on 02/19/2005 3:03:53 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Man I'll just have to ROTFL if those amateur wannabe saboteurs forgot the simple step of not covering their internet tracks.

I had an early home Verizon DSL setup. They gave me a static IP which they took away about a year or so ago. Nobody could be the kind of dumb that they would post from a static block?

70 posted on 02/19/2005 3:09:12 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I find it quite interesting that the WAshington Post would be using FREEREPUBLIC for their dirty tricks, especially since they and the LASLIMES saw fit to sue Jim for the posters threading Wapo stories. (copywrite)

This could be a big deal if Jim has the goods on them. Hope his legal beagles are busy.

71 posted on 02/19/2005 3:09:32 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: marty60

copywrite = copyright


72 posted on 02/19/2005 3:10:51 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller
"mosk, WaPo what about Snyder?"

Snyder, WaPo also

73 posted on 02/19/2005 3:10:58 PM PST by deadhead (God Bless Our Troops and Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The apparent purpose of this little charade was to a.) smear some mud on Ehrlich and, more importantly, b.) innoculate O'Malley against womanizing claims.

Well yours is the first guess at what this is all about. Though I'm not sure I buy it. It seems a somewhat tortured way to go about something like this.

Possibly the smearing the mud on Ehlrich has some truth because in one of the newspaper articles I read after this "scandal" hit all of the Dems took some serious, but stupid, slaps at Ehrlich.

They went on and on about how he fired "wonderful" people, often escorting them from their jobs with armed guards. It did give the Dems an opportunity to spout off about Ehrlich's probably much needed clean up of Merryland public offices.

Still, it seems that as part of any sort of "plan", ie pre-conceived, it requires too much luck and happenstance.

The reporter angle makes sense. The Baltimore reporters being all pissed off at Ehrlich and this Steffen shows up like a sheep going to slaughter and the reporter(S?) pounce.

It became a good story that the Dems took advantage of to take swipes at Ehrlich. AND, assuming the Baltimore Sun is somehow involved in it, well that rag hates Ehrlich. It was more of an opportune thing than something pre-planned by the Dems. At least as I see it.

Besides, the Dems aren't that smart. Especially the Baltimore crooks. As for O'Malley, well he's desperately trying to squelch what everyone knows. He won't succeed, the dolt. But it did give him an opportunity to use the story and so he did.

74 posted on 02/19/2005 3:13:00 PM PST by Fishtalk (Once a liberal and victim of all the spin. Ask me to interpret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
I think they would. It's like an internal memo service, a "house phone" if you will.

The distinction is not important to the story.

That it was "private" was.

75 posted on 02/19/2005 3:13:19 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sausageseller; Jim Robinson

I thougth Mosk and Snyder were MD4BUSH when the story first came out, but it just seems too obvious, who knows. Guessing Jim does and we will know one day.


76 posted on 02/19/2005 3:14:13 PM PST by deadhead (God Bless Our Troops and Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bigcheese

ping


77 posted on 02/19/2005 3:19:44 PM PST by bigcheese ("Volusia County, the other Bithlo")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Definately an inside job IMO, by someone who doesn't like him at work.

MD4BUSH posted to NCPAC that he is married to a woman that reads Atlantic (a liberal mag).
And that he was at a Dem Debate Party at a bar that O'Malloy was at.

Sounds like a lib pretending to be a conservative. IMO


78 posted on 02/19/2005 3:20:39 PM PST by loboinok (Gun Control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma


79 posted on 02/19/2005 3:22:25 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Juan Williams just pushed the "leftist talking points on this story" at 6:21 pm EST on Foxnews, sitting next to one of the Beltway Boys, I forgot his name.

The Beltway Boy, let it slide, and skipped the real story.

Not good, the debate is being framed in a bad way.


80 posted on 02/19/2005 3:26:22 PM PST by JerseyHighlander (I am today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson