Posted on 02/19/2005 1:53:03 PM PST by Jim Robinson
The same could be said of the Liberal Government of Canada.
Except our evil, lying, liberals are in charge of us right now.
God Bless President Bush, and you, Jim.
They may be cryptically clever, but they don't have the good common sense and analytical ability of Freepers on a mission.
As I see it - THE MISSION is to stand by our forum - and resist any effort to intimidate us and our right to open, free and enlightened discussion...without fear of oppression and the PC police.
God bless you Jim - bet your Mom never had to say "IntegrityX3"
hf
So long as it gives them "victimhood cover", that is all they care about. Dems only love people who cover up and never do anything else. It is their sole expenditure. They have become a virtual party, a nothing, a looks only, which kills for looks.
ping for later
mosk, WaPo what about Snyder?
LOL!
I am very disappointed in the sloppy journalism that's out there and feel it is our duty to point out factual errors
Ride on Quixote!
I think they would. It's like an internal memo service, a "house phone" if you will.
It's not like we can 'chat' anywhere on FR in "private". We 'chat' in the forums, and the forums are public.
Man I'll just have to ROTFL if those amateur wannabe saboteurs forgot the simple step of not covering their internet tracks. I love technology!
I had an early home Verizon DSL setup. They gave me a static IP which they took away about a year or so ago. Nobody could be the kind of dumb that they would post from a static block?
This could be a big deal if Jim has the goods on them. Hope his legal beagles are busy.
copywrite = copyright
Snyder, WaPo also
Well yours is the first guess at what this is all about. Though I'm not sure I buy it. It seems a somewhat tortured way to go about something like this.
Possibly the smearing the mud on Ehlrich has some truth because in one of the newspaper articles I read after this "scandal" hit all of the Dems took some serious, but stupid, slaps at Ehrlich.
They went on and on about how he fired "wonderful" people, often escorting them from their jobs with armed guards. It did give the Dems an opportunity to spout off about Ehrlich's probably much needed clean up of Merryland public offices.
Still, it seems that as part of any sort of "plan", ie pre-conceived, it requires too much luck and happenstance.
The reporter angle makes sense. The Baltimore reporters being all pissed off at Ehrlich and this Steffen shows up like a sheep going to slaughter and the reporter(S?) pounce.
It became a good story that the Dems took advantage of to take swipes at Ehrlich. AND, assuming the Baltimore Sun is somehow involved in it, well that rag hates Ehrlich. It was more of an opportune thing than something pre-planned by the Dems. At least as I see it.
Besides, the Dems aren't that smart. Especially the Baltimore crooks. As for O'Malley, well he's desperately trying to squelch what everyone knows. He won't succeed, the dolt. But it did give him an opportunity to use the story and so he did.
The distinction is not important to the story.
That it was "private" was.
I thougth Mosk and Snyder were MD4BUSH when the story first came out, but it just seems too obvious, who knows. Guessing Jim does and we will know one day.
ping
Definately an inside job IMO, by someone who doesn't like him at work.
MD4BUSH posted to NCPAC that he is married to a woman that reads Atlantic (a liberal mag).
And that he was at a Dem Debate Party at a bar that O'Malloy was at.
Sounds like a lib pretending to be a conservative. IMO
Juan Williams just pushed the "leftist talking points on this story" at 6:21 pm EST on Foxnews, sitting next to one of the Beltway Boys, I forgot his name.
The Beltway Boy, let it slide, and skipped the real story.
Not good, the debate is being framed in a bad way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.