Posted on 02/24/2005 8:28:51 AM PST by 2banana
You're missing the point. It's not to identify; the point is to attack confidence and self-esteem. Little girls have been doing it to each other for as long as there have been little girls. It's artful, indirect, aggression designed to injure psychologically without triggering a defensable physical retaliation.
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
I was just describing my theory on the incorrect usage of the word homophobia.....
There are no such things as hate crimes...just crimes of violence and as soon as we just prosecute people for the crimes of violence and stop trying to be mind police the better off the country will be.....
I dont understand how the little girl analogy fits here???
If Matthew Shepherd's death was motivated by drugs and robbery, then there's no "cause" to rally behind. Matthew Shepherd is a BIG cause in the gay community. He may be their biggest martyr. They'll NEVER give him up. They'll never accept he was probably killed because some junkie wanted money.
"I think I've learned that even though people are not accepting [of others], they still value life," Alley said.
As though conservatives who condemn same sex propaganda don't "value life."
"I want the audience to see there's a ton of different people out there. You can't just discriminate against one group because there are different types of people within that group."
Pure unadulterated gobbledy gook, spoken as though it made any sense whatsoever. These people have a serious mental illness.
Teachers said the play forces students to confront homophobia.
Anyone notice how the teachers are practically 100% behind the homo-indoctrination here? Notice that "homophobia" is now the Great Satan?
"It's been a powerful experience already," said Carolyn Belle Lyday, a religion teacher and adviser for the school's gay and lesbian club.
Note the RELIGION teacher is the gay and lesbian club advisor.
"It helps people be honest about how they really feel."
Folks, the world has gone mad. There's nothing more to say. Resistence to evil is now absolutely necessary, or we are as guilty as those promoting evil.
No.
It's happened a million times, it happens all the time.
No it doesn't.
What is so outlandish about someone being killed for being gay?
Because physical assault, let alone murder, in any form is deviant in this culture.
People hate homosexuals everywhere, if this thread is proof of anything it's proof of that.
Circular reasoning. If your thesis were incorrect, what evidence would you accept proving that fact?
No blame it on the homophobes.
Actually, it is kindness to tell the truth that homosexual behavior is unnatural, unhealthy and immoral. It is also GREAT kindness to tell the truth that no one has to be "gay".
It is cruelty to indoctrinate young kids into the "gay" life - condemning them to an early death, deviant promiscuity, sex practices which are wildly unhealthy and cause innumerable diseases, and lead to emotional problems. Condemning them to the loneliness of never having a real family. Enslaving them with the lie that they are "born that way".
BTW, the killers would have had less hatred aimed at them if they had admitted at the outset that the murder was about drugs and theft rather than homosexuality. So why were they silent? Lawyers told them to be silent.
Oh - and Buh Bye.
Not so much weeping as - well, seriously po'ed.
Turn the other cheek is for personal insults. Not when people are trying to destroy the foundation of all morality.
Good to "see" you!
Sometimes I do, actually.
HMMMM - where was the outcry of hollywood and libs and the gayrights for the murder of this young child.
Oh yeah - it wasn't a hate crime because the victim wasn't gay
Exactly. They used his death to promote their cause. If I were his family, I would be outraged
It was not an analogy; it was an example.
Females are much more averse to risking physical injury than males. That doesn't mean they are any less aggressive. It does mean they employ techniques that injure without posing a physical threat, so normally they are immune to physical retaliation for said injury.
Homosexual activists, indeed leftist of all stripes, employ the same kind of techniques.
Deviants are limited in number by definition. To employ direct physical aggression as a rule would be suicidal for them. Using this technique also has an added benefit; so long as the person using it does not become physical, and has no concern for the opinion of the victim, there is literally nothing the victim can do defend themself.
It was not an analogy; it was an example.
Females are much more averse to risking physical injury than males. That doesn't mean they are any less aggressive. It does mean they employ techniques that injure without posing a physical threat, so normally they are immune to physical retaliation for said injury.
Homosexual activists, indeed leftist of all stripes, employ the same kind of techniques.
Deviants are limited in number by definition. To employ direct physical aggression as a rule would be suicidal for them. Using this technique also has an added benefit; so long as the person using it does not become physical, and has no concern for the opinion of the victim, there is literally nothing the victim can do defend themself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.