Skip to comments.
Ice age bacteria brought back to life
www.NewScientist.com ^
| 2/25/2005
| Kelly Young
Posted on 02/25/2005 12:57:59 PM PST by aimhigh
A bacterium that sat dormant in a frozen pond in Alaska for 32,000 years has been revived by NASA scientists.
Once scientists thawed the ice, the previously undiscovered bacteria started swimming around on the microscope slide. The researchers say it is the first new species of microbe found alive in ancient ice. Now named Carnobacterium pleistocenium, it is thought to have lived in the Pleistocene epoch, a time when woolly mammoths still roamed the Earth.
NASA astrobiologist Richard Hoover, who led the team, said the find bolsters the case for finding life elsewhere in the universe, particularly given this week's news, broken by New Scientist, of frozen lakes just beneath the surface of equatorial Mars.
..Excerpt..
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: archaeology; bacteria; climate; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; pleistocene; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-109 next last
Ready for the next plague?
1
posted on
02/25/2005 12:58:00 PM PST
by
aimhigh
To: aimhigh
will the same science work to get hair growing again?
2
posted on
02/25/2005 12:59:36 PM PST
by
nikos1121
To: aimhigh
Please tell me they've destroyed it.
Please?
To: aimhigh
4
posted on
02/25/2005 1:00:18 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: aimhigh
Why such initial negativity?
5
posted on
02/25/2005 1:00:34 PM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: aimhigh
My gosh...don't they know what could happen? Don't they watch X-Files???
6
posted on
02/25/2005 1:00:55 PM PST
by
RosieCotton
(A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it. - GK Chesterton)
To: nuffsenuff
Please tell me they've destroyed it. Please?
I was thinking the same thing...
7
posted on
02/25/2005 1:00:58 PM PST
by
frogjerk
To: BenLurkin
See Smilla's Sense of Snow.
8
posted on
02/25/2005 1:01:06 PM PST
by
job
("God is not dead nor doth He sleep")
To: aimhigh
It's listed as having voted in Chicago as a Democrat last year...
9
posted on
02/25/2005 1:01:52 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: aimhigh
Incredible.
This could get very interesting.
To: aimhigh; windcliff
Now named Carnobacterium pleistocenium, it is thought to have lived in the Pleistocene epoch, a time when woolly mammoths still roamed the Earth. Would bringing this bacteria back to life be considered a "Mammoth" undertaking.
Time to watch "The Andromeda Strain" again.
To: neverdem
12
posted on
02/25/2005 1:02:46 PM PST
by
BostonianRightist
(I don't trust a government I can't shoot back at.)
To: aimhigh
The natural processes of this world took it out of circulation for a reason. Sometimes scientists truly irritate me.
Regards, Ivan
13
posted on
02/25/2005 1:02:55 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: aimhigh
Ice age bacteria brought back to lifeYou mean, the bacteria was DEAD and scientists reanimated the bacteria?
I think the article should have said "Ice age bacteria thawed"
14
posted on
02/25/2005 1:04:04 PM PST
by
frogjerk
To: aimhigh
A scientist grew bacillus isolated from the salt crystals of an ancient sea bed. The bacillus sample was 250 million years old. That's the current record holder.
15
posted on
02/25/2005 1:04:54 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: aimhigh
It's a miracle that it managed to survive.
Geeez, the Engangered Species Act wasn't passed until 1973.
How could it go for thousands of years without Government protection?
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: frogjerk
Revitalized or revived would probably be a better term.
18
posted on
02/25/2005 1:05:39 PM PST
by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: aimhigh; neverdem; blam; SunkenCiv
19
posted on
02/25/2005 1:06:26 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: RosieCotton
X-Files and countless other science fiction movies. This will turn out badly, I am sure.
Science fiction aside, they really shouldn't be tampering with things they don't understand. Some of these organisms frozen in the ice for millenia might really turn out to be a long-dormant plague or some other nasty little thing. It should stay where it is and not brought into a different world, in a different climate. Many things on our Earth have changed in those many years, and there is no way to tell how it would react to those changes.
20
posted on
02/25/2005 1:06:46 PM PST
by
dahicks
To: nuffsenuff
Destroy it? It will be placed on the Endangered Species List and protected!
21
posted on
02/25/2005 1:08:41 PM PST
by
CobraJet
To: aimhigh
If something bad happens, we all know who's in the White House and who the MSM will go after.
22
posted on
02/25/2005 1:09:21 PM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: aimhigh
Yeah, NOONE has immunity to this microbe.
Wouldn't it be funny if this is the microbe that cause massive extinction...oh wait. Maybe not.
23
posted on
02/25/2005 1:09:26 PM PST
by
sandbar
To: aimhigh
A bacterium that sat dormant in a frozen pond in Alaska for 32,000 years has been revived by NASA scientists.And upon seeing the movies nominated for Academy Awards this year, promptly went dormant again.
24
posted on
02/25/2005 1:10:03 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: nuffsenuff
25
posted on
02/25/2005 1:10:10 PM PST
by
Barney59
(Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
To: nuffsenuff
What could go wrong? Sounds like the 1950's movie, "The Thing". Of course, it is probably classified as an endangered species, so we can't destroy it.
To: aimhigh
Perhaps now we will finally find out for sure what killed the dinosaurs.
27
posted on
02/25/2005 1:11:03 PM PST
by
tarator
To: pabianice
It's listed as having voted in Chicago as a Democrat last year...CA Democrats commented that we aren't spending nearly enough federal funds to rehabilitate this most needy of all life forms.
To: aimhigh
29
posted on
02/25/2005 1:12:05 PM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: dahicks
I'd rather have them bring it to life in a controlled and contained lab and learn about it than have some speciman thaw on its own and get into circulation without warning.
To: dahicks
they really shouldn't be tampering with things they don't understand.
I can appreciate your caution however, there are many things we would not have today if somebody decided not to fool with "things they don't understand."
To: aimhigh
Just what I was thinking. Defrost these bugs and you never know what you get.
32
posted on
02/25/2005 1:16:57 PM PST
by
hershey
To: aimhigh
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
33
posted on
02/25/2005 1:17:06 PM PST
by
rintense
To: Barney59
Hey Barn. Better go tell Miss Krump about this.
34
posted on
02/25/2005 1:18:27 PM PST
by
Graymatter
(There are times when the Rule of Law needs an override.)
To: aimhigh
Science has thawed out the bacteria that caused the extenction of the Wolly Mammouth! Yippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!
35
posted on
02/25/2005 1:19:37 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(If the left hates you, you are obviously right.)
To: sandbar
The % of bacteria that cause human disease out of all the bacteria species in the world is microscopic.
We're all constantly bathed in bacteria all the time.
To: aimhigh
I can see the headlines now: "Disney opens Pleistobacterium Park on Remote Arctic Island."
37
posted on
02/25/2005 1:22:30 PM PST
by
ManHunter
(You can run, but you'll only die tired...)
To: mysterio
"The bacillus sample was 250 million years old. That's the current record holder."
But.. but.... the Earth is only 5,000 years old! [/lunatic]
38
posted on
02/25/2005 1:23:00 PM PST
by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
To: nikos1121
will the same science work to get hair growing again?Only a billiard ball.
39
posted on
02/25/2005 1:23:24 PM PST
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
To: aimhigh
"Another interesting article: "Prehistoric bacteria revived from buried salt" by J. Travis in Science News Volume 155, June 12, 1999, p. 373. In this article, J. Travis has interviewed such men as William D. Rosenzweig and Russell H. Vreeland of Penn. University who have now announced to have isolated and revived bacteria from salt deposits that is 250 million years old. Also in the paper, a researcher is mentioned, who is said to have been ahead of his time claimed, back in the 1960s, to have revived bacillus and other bacteria from salt deposits more than 500 million years old.
40
posted on
02/25/2005 1:23:50 PM PST
by
blam
To: Graymatter
You mean the Miss Krump of Mayberry fame?
41
posted on
02/25/2005 1:23:58 PM PST
by
Barney59
(Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
To: aimhigh
LOL...that's what I was thinking too...
Sometimes scientists are just "Book smart & life stupid..."
To: aimhigh
43
posted on
02/25/2005 1:25:58 PM PST
by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye Shall Find)
To: aimhigh
I really wish that scientists would stop with the whole, "We found life in [some extreme environment] so that means that life on other planets is more possible." Not unless you are a creationist. Just because life can live in an extreme environment does not mean that it could develop in that extreme environment. Yeah, life might be able to live in a very broad range of temperatures and pressures but the sort of initial development that scientists suggest for life first evolving is much more narrow and specialized.
To: Barney59
Here's Miss Krump! BLOB alert!
45
posted on
02/25/2005 1:30:41 PM PST
by
Graymatter
(There are times when the Rule of Law needs an override.)
To: Graymatter
Hmmm...I thought this all sounded rather familiar.
46
posted on
02/25/2005 1:33:07 PM PST
by
Chinito
(We ARE the people our parents warned us about....)
To: aimhigh
To: yankeedame
To: tallhappy
Why such initial negativity?Because we are likely to have ZERO resistance to bacteria, funguses, and viruses from 32,000 years ago.
Like 'wipe out the entire Earth' vulnerability.
49
posted on
02/25/2005 1:38:03 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
To: tallhappy
Why such initial negativity?Because we are likely to have ZERO resistance to bacteria, funguses, and viruses from 32,000 years ago.
Like 'wipe out the entire Earth' vulnerability.
50
posted on
02/25/2005 1:38:06 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson