Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pan_Yans Wife; fat city; freedom44; Tamsey; Grampa Dave; PhiKapMom; McGavin999; Hinoki Cypress; ...
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”

2 posted on 02/26/2005 9:12:48 AM PST by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoctorZIn
Just saw a good NYT book review you will be interested in.

Here

3 posted on 02/26/2005 9:17:08 AM PST by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn

BUMP


6 posted on 02/26/2005 10:47:35 AM PST by Khashayar (We are the champions, No time to lose us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn; F14 Pilot; nuconvert; freedom44; Khashayar; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP
The author is intelligent and has written an articulate essay.

The fourth option--Upon failure of the negotiations the US and Europe adopt a "regime change policy" and begin supporting the Iranian people who are calling for a referendum on their form of government.--shares a fallacy common with several of the article author's options, i.e.:

I stipulate that France and Germany--as well as the current regime in Tehran--are negotiating in bad faith;

Further, that Tehran will a) never agree to stop seeking nuclear weapons, and b) never agree to effective inspections to verify any tactical agreement;

That France and Germany (and Russia and China) would prefer an Iran which continues to be a menace to the United States;

That Britain has gone wobbly, got the vapors, is simply not up to the job;

That--although these "young people with a favorable opinion of America" are alleged to be so naive that they would instantly eschew that warm, fuzzy feeling should the United States attack the mullahs' nuclear sites--the primary factor in determining U.S. actions is always what is in the interest of national security;

That in no way, Jose, would Europe (come on, France and Germany) ever, ever, ever unite with us vis-a-vis sanctions on Iran, Security Council "action" on Iran, or aid public or covert to opponents of the current tyrannical regime.

I therefore suggest that we not let the greedy arms merchants and anti-U.S. bigots of France, Germany, Russia and China dictate what is in the interest of America and the Iranian people.

We must make it clear either through billboards or taking ministers into the cloak room for a chat that we will not allow this rope-a-dope to proceed, as the mullahs are simply stalling, stonewalling and sticking to their manic drive for nuclear weapons.

We--the U.S. government in all its overt and covert capacities--should be undercutting the current regime and supporting at every level the people of Iran in the broadest possible sense.

Absent direct action there will be nuclear terror with the direst consequences for the people of both the United States and Iran.

9 posted on 02/26/2005 5:27:26 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn

Bump!


10 posted on 02/26/2005 7:02:42 PM PST by windchime (Hillary: "I've always been a preying person")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson