Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only in the Movies - (Oscars ignore Mel Gibson's Passion of the Christ)
BREAKPOINT.COM ^ | FEBRUARY 24, 2005 | GINA R. DALFONZO

Posted on 02/26/2005 4:53:32 PM PST by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2005 4:53:33 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
Ping!

Char :)

2 posted on 02/26/2005 4:54:37 PM PST by CHARLITE (glad to see lib Dem rats on sinking ship, unable to disembark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
(Of course, I’m sure it didn’t help the movie’s chances that Mel Gibson refused to campaign for it. But I think many of us found his attitude a rather satisfying rejoinder to all the people who hated the movie but nevertheless felt it their duty to tell him how he should spend the profits from it.)

This is spin, and an extremely important point which pretty much squashes the argument. In Hollywood, if you don't campaign for an Oscar, you ain't getting one. Look at Michael Moore--no one can tell me he is not loved by Hollywood, yet he deliberately avoided the Best Doc category (and put the movie on TV before the allowed date) to get Best Pic. He failed because of the politics of wanting to give those noms to movies with directors and producers who could give the Academy members work (and hwo are the voters friends).

I didn't know Gibson didn't campaign; this puts a whole other reality on the table. Not campaigning is a snub of the process, and is flipping them the bird. No wonder they didn't nominate the movie.

3 posted on 02/26/2005 5:01:56 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

The Passion was the last movie I saw in theaters. I don't care if I see another movie or not at the theater.


4 posted on 02/26/2005 5:02:31 PM PST by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
"A scene where Kinsey confesses his infidelity with a male assistant (Peter Sarsgaard) establishes [his wife] as the audience surrogate, an emotional victim of his hurtful philosophy that not all sex has to be sanctioned by love. . . . But her acceptance of her husband’s behavior slyly foreshadows the sexual revolution.”

YECH! Thanks for the warning.

Doesn't Luara Linney play the wife? There's something hot about her...

5 posted on 02/26/2005 5:03:11 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I'm a subscriber to Premiere (a movie magazine). When the Premiere magazine critic gave "The Passion" a 0 star rating, I canceled my subscription.
If they are too blind to see past their prejudices, then I want nothing to do with them.


6 posted on 02/26/2005 5:05:54 PM PST by mowkeka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I didn't see it, I don't go to movies.
I heard it was very moving, though.

Also I hear that there will be a released "tamed" version...

7 posted on 02/26/2005 5:07:26 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
When I went to see The Passion, the theater was about half full. At the end of the movie, even after the credits were done, all most everyone remained in their seats, most crying.

I truly doubt there has ever been another movie in the history of Hollywood that has had this effect.

This snub is glaring bigotry from the left.

8 posted on 02/26/2005 5:08:31 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Part of it is political, of course. Another part of it is that in the postmodern age there are hardly any sensible critics left: of literature, of art, of drama, of movies. The critics who dominate the academy and the media today wouldn't know good art from bad art if they saw it.

"There's no accounting for taste" is an old saying. It sure is true today.


9 posted on 02/26/2005 5:09:01 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

The Passion has three mentions -cinematography, makeup and score.

USA Today writes: "Drug addiction, mercy killing, mental illness, genocide, abortion, ill young mothers and borderline alcoholism — these are a few of Oscar's favorite things this year".


10 posted on 02/26/2005 5:16:39 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Bottom line........Mel laughed all the way to the bank. It is also the last movie I saw on the screen. Most actors are not worth a penny, because of their attitudes.


11 posted on 02/26/2005 5:19:57 PM PST by marmar (Even though I may look different then you...my blood runs red, white and blue.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I didn't know Gibson didn't campaign; this puts a whole other reality on the table. Not campaigning is a snub of the process, and is flipping them the bird. No wonder they didn't nominate the movie.

Nonsense.

12 posted on 02/26/2005 5:30:17 PM PST by GhostSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Who cares?
You can't claim to despise Hollywood values and then clamor for their approval. Being left out is a GOOD thing.


13 posted on 02/26/2005 6:07:23 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier

Great argument.


14 posted on 02/26/2005 6:13:27 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

hehehe...that brought tears to my eyes, I laughed so hard. I must be slap-happy tonight. Something that simple shouldn't be so funny to me...unngh


15 posted on 02/26/2005 6:31:50 PM PST by sam_whiskey (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sam_whiskey

It's one of the joys in life to find humor in simple things, such as Howard Dean or Terry McAuliffe. I mean, I just mentioned their names and I bet you're laughing just as I am!


16 posted on 02/26/2005 7:01:38 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Condi Rice: Yeaaahhh, baybee! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350654/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lizma

Most of the theater stayed through the credits when I saw it too...I remember the same kind of feeling in the audience for Platoon in 1986.


17 posted on 02/26/2005 7:40:34 PM PST by Joey Silvera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; xzins; P-Marlowe; Revelation 911; connectthedots; fortheDeclaration; HairOfTheDog; ...

You know, "The Passion" is an incredible movie. I would have loved to see it win the top honors.

But something within me just tells me that Jesus isn't all that worried about Oscar. He's more concerned that we're still not getting His message.


18 posted on 02/26/2005 7:45:41 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (One Iraqi purple finger took more courage than John Kerry's three purple hearts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
The Passion has three mentions -cinematography, makeup and score.

Photographically, the Passion was gorgeous. The textures of the backdrop surfaces worked almost as powerfully as black and white.

19 posted on 02/26/2005 10:06:27 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
A scene where Kinsey confesses his infidelity with a male assistant (Peter Sarsgaard) establishes [his wife] as the audience surrogate, an emotional victim of his hurtful philosophy that not all sex has to be sanctioned by love. . . . But her acceptance of her husband’s behavior slyly foreshadows the sexual revolution.”

Did anyone see this? It sounds like a cheaply made porn movie.

20 posted on 02/27/2005 12:30:31 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson