Skip to comments.
Police Zap Dad Accused Of Stealing Salad At Chuck E. Cheese
newsnet5.com ^
Posted on 03/02/2005 7:09:34 AM PST by esryle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 541-552 next last
To: Last Visible Dog
Your overreaction
Subjective.
and mistating of what was said
Debatable.
is what I said was knee-jerk.
Irrelevant.
401
posted on
03/02/2005 12:13:32 PM PST
by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: Graycliff
The witnesses said he refused to cooperate. One witness said the officers were out of control. The officers said he assaulted them, the witnesses said he was repeatedly poked in the chest, but did not assault the officers.
Someone has to be, er, stretching the truth.
You'd think the witnesses would be upset at Gale or causing the incident, but they seem to blame the cops. And they were actually there.
Seems a little odd. I would be supporting the cops 100% if I felt that someone was out of control around my kids (hec, I would help the cops). I find it curious that this isn't the case with these witnesses. Do you think they are in on a conspiracy with him, and agreed to get a cut of any lawsuit money?
402
posted on
03/02/2005 12:15:20 PM PST
by
Stu Cohen
(Press '1' for English)
To: Protagoras
If he resisted, he should pay the price for that. If the police acted wrongly, they should also suffer the consequences. Agreed? To quote Frank Zappa: "Give that man a donut and tell him to stick closer to Church-oriented social activities"
...ok, that was really not applicable but for some reason it popped into my head.
You have summed up the entire situation nicely - to quote Zappa again, you have found the crux of the biscuit - although I think the police mishandled the situation given the facts that have been presented. The police have been given the power to KILL PEOPLE and DENY RIGHTS therefore their standard of conduct must be judged at a much HIGHER level than a citizen having lunch.
To: Cultural Jihad
Sad to see so many "Quickdraw McGraws" out there in FReeperland gunning against the police in a knee-jerk way. Those who do so must have serious personal problems in their lives.
I can't believe that you are more concerned with a guy who may have taken an unpaid trip to a salad bar than with actions of armed policemen in this case. Are police never wrong? Do they never escalate situations? Doesn't it look a whole like this one is one where they probably are wrong, and did unecessarily endanger people over nothing?
Yeah, maybe by the time the manager and the police got through pushing this guy's buttons he was to the point they did have to use violence to remove him from the restaurant. The point is, you see absolutely nothing wrong with anyone's behavior here except the dad's, and that is truly mind-boggling.
To: Stu Cohen
I don't leave my kids unattended either. Either the kids were standing right there -- in which case they could have stepped outside with Mr. Gale -- or they were already unattended while Mr. Gale was engaged in this dispute.
If there was evidence of theft, he would have been so charged.
Not necessarily.
Actually, they can't let a bona-fide theft charge "go" because he (allegedly, but not corroberated by any patron) assaulted him. It would be an additional charge.
They can "let it go." Especially if it would be difficult to prove in court, unlike the assault charges, which will be easy to prosecute.
405
posted on
03/02/2005 12:19:12 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: beezdotcom
One man's insult is another man's truth. Or were you deliberately missing the point of my original question? That would indeed make you merely 'stubborn', instead of 'comprehension-impaired'. I think you jumped in by misstating what I said so you should go easy on the passing of judgment on other people. You spewed a personal insult - personal insults are a sure sign you are running out of intellectual ammunition and trying to defend personal insults just makes it worse.
To: SalukiLawyer
. . . and did unecessarily endanger people over nothing?
More than likely he was asked to leave and refused, and hence the trespassing charge. Trespassing itself is "nothing," eh? Interesting.
To: Stu Cohen
You'd think the witnesses would be upset at Gale or causing the incident, but they seem to blame the cops.
Actually, the one witness was upset because the guy was tasered in her sister's lap, so she could still be indignant over that. Aside from that, though, I'd like to know if there's any ethnic strife/kinship between witness/suspect, manager/suspect, cop/suspect, cop/witness, etc. That could do a lot to flesh out the entire picture.
408
posted on
03/02/2005 12:21:52 PM PST
by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: RadioAstronomer
The last words the LEOs told me after they figured out I could not be the perp, was "have a nice day". (Not even sorry, go figure) They probably figured you probably deserved it for something. And I'll bet they were right, too.... ;-)
409
posted on
03/02/2005 12:21:54 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: Cultural Jihad
investigation of disorderly conduct. That would lead me to believe he was loud and disturbing customers.
resisting arrest. Had to be fighting with the officers
trespassing. That charge had to filed by the Establishment, which leads me to believe he was asked to leave by the Manager.
Some people just don't know when to quit.
410
posted on
03/02/2005 12:26:19 PM PST
by
Graycliff
("Life is just one darn thing after another; LOVE is just two darn things after each other.")
To: r9etb
They probably figured you probably deserved it for something. And I'll bet they were right, too.... ;-)LMAO! At least for the very bad taste in driving a beat up old 1973 blue CJ-5.
To: r9etb
Either the kids were standing right there -- in which case they could have stepped outside with Mr. Gale -- or they were already unattended while Mr. Gale was engaged in this dispute. Did the police make that option available? We aren't really sure.
If there was evidence of theft, he would have been so charged.
Not necessarily.
Oh yes. Necessarily. If there was evidence, he would be so charged. those guys who go on the 300 mile police chases almost always face 718 counts of running a red light, 100 counts of not using a turn signal, etc, etc. Now, whether they are prosecuted on those things is a different matter - but they are charged with any and all malfeasance where such evidence to do so ecists.
They can "let it go."
Actually, they cannot if there is evidence, unless THE MANAGER decided not to press charges. And if he did that, and had no evidence to backup the initial assertion, Chuck E. Cheese IS going to be writing a check.
Especially if it would be difficult to prove in court
That's up to the DA, not the officers.
unlike the assault charges, which will be easy to prosecute.
If evidence exists for both, they should be equally easy. And given the statements from the eyewitnesses, it doesn't seem that the assault charges are going to be anywhere near easy to prove. Quite the contrary. The taxpayers may very well be writing a check as well.
412
posted on
03/02/2005 12:27:25 PM PST
by
Stu Cohen
(Press '1' for English)
To: SalukiLawyer
"The manager said the man was seen "loading" his plate at the salad bar............."
Where did he get the plate?
To: beezdotcom
Actually, the one witness was upset because the guy was tasered in her sister's lap, so she could still be indignant over that. Aside from that, though, I'd like to know if there's any ethnic strife/kinship between witness/suspect, manager/suspect, cop/suspect, cop/witness, etc. That could do a lot to flesh out the entire picture. Oh yeah, a DA's dream case. Proving that all the witnesses lied because they were black/hispanic/whatever.
414
posted on
03/02/2005 12:29:58 PM PST
by
Stu Cohen
(Press '1' for English)
To: TheSpottedOwl
Chucky Cheesee is owned, or at least used to be owned, by the guy who invented the Atari video game system. I saw a bio of him on TV. Early on, his business partners told him that the pizza at his restaurants tasted like cardboard and he assured them that kids don't give a damn about good pizza.
To: Stu Cohen
(I didn't see any charges leading to the incident in the fist place.)
I Do.
Trespassing, obviously he was asked to leave and didn't. As a Peace officer ( at least in TX ) I can't level that charge, only the property owner can.
416
posted on
03/02/2005 12:31:49 PM PST
by
Graycliff
("Life is just one darn thing after another; LOVE is just two darn things after each other.")
To: esryle
Welcome to Chucky Cheese! Would you like to try our new Taser salad today? Come on, try it! Free Skeeball tickets with every meal!
Thanks for coming, see you next time! Buh Bye!
417
posted on
03/02/2005 12:35:17 PM PST
by
TheForceOfOne
(Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
To: Graycliff
OK, Your gonna have to show me this Authorization. I was a Peace Officer for 28 yrs and I've never seen or heard of it. You are joking? Right.
Members of the police force are authorized to carry guns and are authorized to use deadly force when it is warranted. This authorization comes from the people. You were a police officer yet you did not know that police officers are authorized to use deadly force?? Something is not right about your story.
As part of their jobs, police officers are authorized to kill people if circumstanced warrant deadly force (that is what "deadly force" means) and police are authorized to deny people their rights (like locking people up against their will - if a citizen tried that it is called kidnapping)
Did you carry a gun when you were a "peace officer"?
Even Barney Fife was issued one bullet.
To: Cultural Jihad
More than likely he was asked to leave and refused, and hence the trespassing charge. Trespassing itself is "nothing," eh? Interesting.
I do not doubt you are correct. He may have stole some lettuce. He may have even stolen a big mounded plate full of lettuce with cherry tomatoes as well. When confronted with his crime, he may have refused to leave, and, his business invitation being revoked he may very well have been guilty of trespassing at that time.
I respectfully invite you to make the jump from your assumption that the dad was doing something wrong to forming a judgment about what response is appropriate by armed agents of the state. While you are fixated on the former, people like Last Visible Dog are saying the latter is a more important issue.
Did you ever watch The Andy Griffith Show? Were you capable of getting the joke that Barney, who was a personality-disorder-in-a-uniform was not a good policeman, and the show made fun of him? Can you imagine an episode where Barney, who can no longer be trusted with a gun, is given a taser (supposing they had those then?)
I can. I think it would be funny as heck.
To: Callahan
Early on, his business partners told him that the pizza at his restaurants tasted like cardboard and he assured them that kids don't give a damn about good pizza.
Indeed, no one is dragged there against their will and forced to purchase their fare. It shouldn't matter whether they serve the best or worst food; freeloaders should not be tolerated, and if they become uncooperative and rude they should be asked to leave, and if they refuse to leave then they need to spend a timeout in the Naughty Corner with all the other Me-ocrats.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 541-552 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson