Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(WA): Builders group uses trick to check out voters’ signature
The News Tribune ^ | 4 march 2005

Posted on 03/04/2005 12:33:13 PM PST by llevrok

OLYMPIA, Wash. -- The Building Industry Association of Washington recently sent hundreds of surveys to King County residents, claiming its purpose was to help project housing trends in the Puget Sound region.

Turns out the three-question survey -- enclosed with a $10 check as an incentive to return it -- was part of a plan by backers of former Republican gubernatorial candidate Dino Rossi to search for fraudulent votes cast in the disputed November election, The Seattle Times reported Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewstribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: elections; revote; stealingelections; stolenelection; votefraud; voterfraud; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2005 12:33:14 PM PST by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: llevrok

If this is true I dont agree with these methods.


2 posted on 03/04/2005 12:34:05 PM PST by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Good going!!!


3 posted on 03/04/2005 12:34:07 PM PST by OldFriend (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; Baynative; bigfootbob; Vicki; goodnesswins; Spanaway Lori

PING


4 posted on 03/04/2005 12:34:24 PM PST by llevrok (Don't blame me! I voted for Pedro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I like it, reminds me of the "free TV giveaways" the cops use to lure in people who have a warrant issued.


5 posted on 03/04/2005 12:34:42 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

I agree with it 100%. Each and every one of them got their ten dollars.


6 posted on 03/04/2005 12:36:08 PM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
If this is true I dont agree with these methods.
Why? I think this is a GREAT WAY to uncover Rat cheating.
7 posted on 03/04/2005 12:36:44 PM PST by bikepacker67 ("Donovan McNabb... I can't HEAR YOU" < / Who's your Mommy>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
If this is true I dont agree with these methods.
Why? I think this is a GREAT WAY to uncover Rat cheating.
8 posted on 03/04/2005 12:37:04 PM PST by bikepacker67 ("Donovan McNabb... I can't HEAR YOU" < / Who's your Mommy>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

>>I like it, reminds me of the "free TV giveaways" the cops use to lure in people who have a warrant issued.<<

HA! The same thing went through my mind. Except these people really did get their 10 dollars.


9 posted on 03/04/2005 12:37:04 PM PST by RobRoy (Child support and maintenence (alimony) are what we used to call indentured slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

If it's legal, that's more than can be said of the Wa. State election.


10 posted on 03/04/2005 12:37:18 PM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

It’s very unseemly. It actually is stealing people’s signatures,” Berendt said.

No they paid $10 for them.


11 posted on 03/04/2005 12:38:21 PM PST by Holicheese (This is Hockey East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
“It’s very unseemly. It actually is stealing people’s signatures,” Berendt said. “What he’s done is essentially a form of identity theft.”

Let me get the Democrat view straight: Forging a vote in someones name is not idenity theft. But, trying to catch the forger is identity theft?

12 posted on 03/04/2005 12:40:34 PM PST by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Tom McCabe, the group’s executive vice president, said about 120 checks or surveys have been returned. About 20 of them raised questions for McCabe.

Some signatures on voter affidavits Democrats submitted in November don’t match signatures on surveys and checks the builders group collected from the same people. McCabe said he suspects Democratic volunteers forged signatures.

State Democratic Party Chairman Paul Berendt said that didn’t happen and suggested that what the BIAW did should be against the law.

“It’s very unseemly. It actually is stealing people’s signatures,” Berendt said. “What he’s done is essentially a form of identity theft.”

Ohh the irony!
13 posted on 03/04/2005 12:41:10 PM PST by bikepacker67 ("Donovan McNabb... I can't HEAR YOU" < / Who's your Mommy>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese
Berendt said nothing about forging the voter's signatures when his dozens went door-to-door (allegedly) , replacing missing ballot signatures with their forged ones. Proving that was the reason of this exercise.
14 posted on 03/04/2005 12:41:23 PM PST by llevrok (Don't blame me! I voted for Pedro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

While it's after the fact, maybe we should do the Purple Finger thing next election. Cuts down on some double voting (though all the other methods of cheating wouldn't be stopped).


15 posted on 03/04/2005 12:42:31 PM PST by theDentist (The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I want to know what they found out.


16 posted on 03/04/2005 12:42:36 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holicheese

That beats stealing people's votes for nothing....


17 posted on 03/04/2005 12:42:53 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
It was a great plan--but you weren't supposed to get caught! :-)

Next time troll for Seattle newspaper reporters in the personal section under "gay sex", take lots of video, and _then_ send out the survey. ;-)
18 posted on 03/04/2005 12:43:06 PM PST by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear
"Let me get the Democrat view straight: Forging a vote in someones name is not idenity theft. But, trying to catch the forger is identity theft?"

Hmmm, that's sounds about right for dem/socialists logic.

19 posted on 03/04/2005 12:43:58 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Christina Spears-Bartunek of Duvall had a quick answer for why the signature on her check was so different from the one on her affidavit. "My husband signed the check,” she told The Times, calling the survey deceptive.

So says the pot calling the kettle black.

20 posted on 03/04/2005 12:44:28 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson