Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rising Sea Dragon in Asia - 2005 UPDATE
JEFFHEAD.COM ^ | March 7, 2005 | Jeff Head

Posted on 03/07/2005 9:49:24 AM PST by Jeff Head

THE RISING SEA DRAGON IN ASIA
2005 Update

By Jeff Head, February 2005


As an update to the original "Rising Sea Dragon in Asia", that I publiushed in January of 2004 (and have been writing and warning about since 2000), I offer this update, dated in February of 2005. This report is fairly short and broad, and I believe does not contain the detail necessary to reflect the true scope of the emerging threat. But it does clearly indicate the nature and size of the current Red Chinese buildup, and their is only one principle power that such a buildup can be directed at, the United States military.

Regarding the continuing naval buildup, the Chinese have already built and launched two of the brand new, very modern, Aegis type Lanzhou Class destroyers, two of the new Guangzhou Class guided missile destroyers, two new Ma'anshan Class guided missile frigates, four of the new large Type 73 Amphibious Assault ships (that's right, four in a very short time frame and more building...can you guess what these are inded for?), and a class of very modern diesle-electric attack subs. In addition, the west has now seen another new class, dubbed the Type 51C that was just launched in December of 2005 in the Dalian, Liaoning Province. Another area air defense destroyer similar to the Type 52C, Lanzho class, this new class is similar in appearance to the Arleigh Burke class original batch destroyers, and is based on the late 1990's Luhai class hull.. It has an Aegis type air defense capability, but no helo facilities, while the two new Type 52C's are similar to the Arliegh Burke Batch IIA ships, with onboard helicopter landing and housing facilities.

All of this is in addition to acquiring four very modern and capable Hangzhou Class destroyers from Russia and a total of twelve very modern Russian diesel-electric subs, as well as currently building their own new and modern classes of nuclear attack subs and ballistic missile submarines, along with continuing heavy research into aircraft carrier design and/or refitting.

The efforts continue unabated as the Red Chinese continue to build or aquire these EIGHT new classes of ships simultaneously at a rapid pace. Eight new classes of ships at once represents a HUGE outlay in technology and capital across the board. It is almost unheard of and is representative of the massive arms build-up the Red Chinese are embarked upon with their new found wealth. If continued, it can have but one goal in mind, a direct challenge for naval dominance in the Pacific Rim and beyond. As stated, that challenege is a direct one to the United States Navy.

In the mean time, the Chinese are also modernizing their naval air forces at a rapid pace, acquiring or license building hundreds of modern SU-27, SU-27SK, and SU-30 aircraft from Russia, many with very credible strike at sea, air to surface missile capabiulities. They are also building their own new J-10 aircraft. Within the past two to three years these efforts represent a quantum leap in terms of the quality of the Red Chinese equipment and the rate at which they are being built or otherwise put into service.

Here are some recent pics.


The brand new construction and launch of the area air defense, Aegis-like, Type 51C Class destroyer.


The new Lanzhou Class (Type 52C) Aegis-like destroyer. 1st commissioned in July 2004, second in service in early 2005.


The new Guangzhou Class (Type 52B) Guided Missile Destroyer. 1st commissioned in July 2004, second in service in early 2005.


The new Hangzhou Class (Type 951/EM) guided missile destroyers. Four acquired from Russia in the last five years, two already in service, two more in 2005. They carry the Russian Sunburn or Moskit cruise missiles, designed to attack US Aircraft Carriers.


The new Ma'anshan Class (Type 054) Guided Missile frigates. Two launched in late 2003, will be in service in early 2005.


Two of the new Type 73 Amphibious Assault Ship class, of which three have already been built.


The new Yuan Class SSK diesel/electric attack submanrine.


The new Russian acquired Kilo Class SSK diesle/electric attack submarines, of which four have been acquired and EIGHT MORE are on order.


Coninued outfitting of the former Russian Vayrag at the Dalian shipyards.


Red Chinese SU-30 and SU-27SK (J11) and SU-27 aircraft.


The chinese Produced J-10 attack fighter.

As these ships are produced in numbers and as the Chinese continue with their across the board naval buildup and their carrier development plans towards ultimately lauching their own, the balance of power in the China Sea and western Pacific is going to hang in the balance. Do not forget, the Chinese have purchased and are studying and apparently refitting western style and Russian aircraft carriers. Their intentions in this regard, with the production of all the support and defense ships necessary to form carrier battle groups of their own is clear. Even without those groups, they are poducing a formidable force to challenge our groups in the inner island chain in the western Pacific.

While the Chinese experience level with this equipment is lacking and will be very much inferior to the decades of practical experience the United States Navy has, there is no doubt that the Chinese are embarked on a path to challenge that experience and heretofore dominance of the U.S. Navy in the region at some point. If within range of large numbers of land-based aircraft and missiles, and if coupled with modern, capable weapons systems like the Sunburn or Moskit missiles and perhaps supercavitiating torpedo technology, a credible threat to American naval supremecy in the western Pacific could be posed in the next few years...and this does not even address their continued rapid buildup of ballistic missiles and modernization program across the board of their land based armed forces, which are proceeding at a similar pace as that described here regarding their navy and naval air forces.

Although the hefty12-14% increase in direct military expenditures of the Red Chinese (and this does not include dual use and so-called private sector input to the defense apparatus-just remeber, in the Red Chinese system, there is no real private sector) represents a small proportion of US Military outlays, remember as well that a significant portion of western outlays goes towards relatively high salaries, benefits, and health care costs that the Chinese system is not burdened with. In terms of outlays towards pure military weapons systems directly, the Chinese are rapidly catching up with western numbers. All of this bears very serious consideration and planning.

While we do so, consider this: As stated, the Chinese are currently building and launching eight modern, entire classes of major combatant vessels (not including the two new nuclear attack and strategic missile submarines)...simultaneously. This is a monumental achievement and compares to the United States Navy which is currently building and launching three new classes of major combatants (the Virginia class subs, the San Antonio class LPDs, and the continuing Burk class destroyers) with plans for two to three more U.S. classes in the future Clearly the Chinese and the PLAN are serious about their future naval capabilities in the China Sea and western Pacific and are rapidly building up across the board to implement them. This should be be reminiscent to our senior citizens who experienced it, or anyone who has studied history, of the rapid buildup of adversary military in the 1930s. We all know where that led.

Again, there can only be one power that the Red Chinese intend to, and must, confront if conflict over geo-political policy comes into play...and that is the U.S. Navy. Such tremendous development, building and launching of vessels indicate that they intend to do just that and their intentions, capabilities and funding in this regard cannot be underestimated.

Copyright © 2005, by Jeff Head


Jeff Head (jeffhead.com) is an engineering consultant who has many years of experience in the power, defense, and computer industries. He currently wotrks for the federal government helping maintain and protect regional infrastructure. He is a member of the U.S. Naval Institute, and he is also the author of a self-published and best-selling fictional series of military techno-thrillers about future military confrontation with the Red Chinese called the Dragon's Fury Series of novels (dragonsfuryseries.com) that projects a fictional third world war arising out of current events.

You can read about that series by clicking on the pictures of the novel covers below:


THE DRAGON'S FURY SERIES OF NOVELS



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsrace; chinesenavy; chinesethreat; dragonsfuryseries; freeperjeffhead; jeffhead; militarybuildup; plan; redchinanavy; redchinathreat; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last
To: Jeff Head

Time to modernize and bring back the Iowa-class battleships. This would be a relatively inexpensive and yet effective strengthening of the Pacific fleet.


41 posted on 03/07/2005 10:28:25 AM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

There has recently been an article here indicating that the Japanese are starting to re-evaluate the structure of their navy (JMSDF) and may be toward developing a true blue-water offensive capability (CVBGs, etc.). But then again, we hear that every spring...


42 posted on 03/07/2005 10:28:59 AM PST by Captain Rhino ("If you will just abandon logic, these things will make a lot more sense to you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

Ive read that they are working on amphibious assault vessels,but the aircraft carrier aspect is still under discussion.My own guess is they will go in for small multi-role vessels which can deploy a handful of JSFs,in addition to helos.You will probably not see the JMSDF Having real carriers till after 2015.


43 posted on 03/07/2005 10:31:41 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Agreed...but it is still a data point that would not have been entertained at all some years ago. That's all. The Chinese will try and woo and otherwise convince India to stay out of any upcoming conflict in the region. IMHO, they will offer a huge carrot as the first way to accomplish that goal.

Given our own ambivalence towards India and allowing the Soviets to help arm them while carrying on with Pakistan ourselves, we may be in danger of China succeeding in that goal.

44 posted on 03/07/2005 10:34:52 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Some very nice targets you got there.. especially the ships..


45 posted on 03/07/2005 10:34:59 AM PST by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Jeff,

Check out this board:

http://bbs.people.com.cn/bbs/mlbrd?to=65

Web site that displays anti-US sentiment. US Carriers also noted (negatively). Not good. They even quoted part of my commentary on an article I posted on FREEREP. 3/3. Their sentiments have a decidedly anti-US bluster/bravado and should be noted carefully, particularly if said comments include US CVBG. They don't seem to be a big fan of GW either.


46 posted on 03/07/2005 10:35:08 AM PST by Bald Eagle777 (No more high-tech Exports to China. None. The Clinton years were a DISASTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Thanks for the ping and the info Jeff!!

Finished your book a few days ago.

Great story!!!

47 posted on 03/07/2005 10:35:42 AM PST by Eaker (stop and kick dirt on these n00bs actin like b00bs.......:o) - Squantos 18-Feb-05 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

No problem. It scares me too. That's why I am involved to the extent I am.


48 posted on 03/07/2005 10:35:54 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Sell Taiwan AEGIS and the latest PATRIOT technology. Bring them under the Regional Missile Umbrella and pointedly inform the Chinese of this. If we in anyway give in on Taiwan and allow that free nation to go down, there will be a new leader emerging on the Western Rim and the impact of which way the Taiwan (ROC) issue goes will dtermine how the pendulum swings in the entire region IMHO.

IF we sell out Taiwan to the Chicoms, THAT will be the DEFINING moment in the USA's decline as a superpower and China's ascendecy.

49 posted on 03/07/2005 10:37:52 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lodwick; Cuttnhorse; operation clinton cleanup; Servant of the 9; catpuppy; null and void; ...

Ping for Jeff's update


50 posted on 03/07/2005 10:40:36 AM PST by Mo1 (Question to the Media/Press ... Why are you hiding the Eason Jordan tapes ????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Buy Chinese, and help our "friends" build even more 'wonderful toys'.


51 posted on 03/07/2005 10:46:19 AM PST by who knows what evil? (If arrogance was beauty, New England women would be supermodels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Here's an interesting site I found on the Varyag Carrier:
http://www.varyagworld.com/

From the photos it looks pretty rusted. I think if the Chinese can't make money off it (another floating casino?), they'd chop it up for study.

For the Chinese to field a carrier in any conflict against Taiwan or the US, is like floating a big "SHOOT ME" target at sea. I doubt they're that stupid.


52 posted on 03/07/2005 10:49:38 AM PST by s_asher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Actually, I think Taiwan needs nukes of it's own. It's fine for us to say that we'll help defend them, but everyone knows that we hold elections every four years and all the Chicoms have to do is wait until the time is right.


53 posted on 03/07/2005 10:52:05 AM PST by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino
They (the JMSDF) have already produced these babies (Ohsumi class):

And have agreed in principle to build these:

They are moving that way for sure.

54 posted on 03/07/2005 10:52:27 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Aegis system in China? I guess clinton sold that stuff too. The Aegis is the worlds most powerful anti-fighter and anti-missile system and the backbone of protecting aircraft carriers.


55 posted on 03/07/2005 10:52:38 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Thank you my friend. If you get the chance, please consider a review here and on Amazon.

Too many things happening that are too close to that fictional scenario for comfort.

56 posted on 03/07/2005 10:54:20 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: unkus

I have no idea. But Taiwan needs to be a part of SEATO along with Japan and Australia.


57 posted on 03/07/2005 10:54:56 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

It's AEGIS-like. They are using phased array radars and significant combat information to guide multiple vertically launched interceptor missiles (AAM). Probably not nearly as sophisticated as AEGIS by any stretch...but a HUGE step forward for them and a threat in any case.


58 posted on 03/07/2005 10:56:46 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I would go for a preemptive attack against China. Obviously no one in our current government would hear of it, but better to fight them now while we can still win.


59 posted on 03/07/2005 10:57:26 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The UN is UN-American! Get the UN out of the US and US out of the UN! http://asiasec.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

The radar system on China's Type-051C & Type 052B class vessels were supposedly built with Ukranian help.One should remember that the Soviets were also working on phased array radars


60 posted on 03/07/2005 10:57:46 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson