Standing by your statement above is fine. I didn't see you post where you stated he did not have the cache of a Peter Jennings or Tom Brokaw.
I was talking about your other statement with the word "always" bolded in my last post to you. But you knew that.
I was just passing on some facts; some people like facts, some don't. Rather and his News Broadcast were #1 for some time. If that counts as always one of the lowest rated in your book, fine with me.
I am just posting to you now because it's entertaining, I don't expect you to agree with me.
Sorry, 5 years is a long time ago for me. So once - a life time ago - he was the bee's knees. Is that your argument? In any case he is not as big a fish as I see him made out to be. He was not an opinion swayer the way Cronkite was or as "beloved" as Brokaw is or as "respected" as Jennings is.