Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaBiscuit

This can't be right. This would be the story of the decade if it is. The Times would spin this story differently. Definitely have to wait and see on this one.


16 posted on 03/13/2005 7:34:59 AM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: speedy; MisterRepublican; cardinal4; ErnBatavia; wouldntbprudent; Noachian
The Times would spin this story differently.

The Times IS spinning this story differently.

Their story is not about the facts presented by News Max, namely that there WERE WMD, banned materials, a well funded and equipped nuclear program, stockpiles of chemicals, etc.

No. The Times story is about the FAILURE of the BUSH ADMINISTRATION to secure these items (which the Times has been insisting were never there).

This isn't proof that WMDs were present and the Times was wrong. Oh no. That's old news. They've moved on from that. This is proof that the war was run incompetently.

If AlGore or J F'n Kerry or the oh so perfect Kofi were in charge they would have found the WMD and secured them.

It's all Bush's fault!

64 posted on 03/13/2005 7:59:40 AM PST by Phsstpok ("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: speedy

Newsmax did a very good job of selectively piecing together quotes from the article to try to prove their angle, but if you read the entire article, you see Newsmax is just up to their usual game of flat-out LYING.


162 posted on 03/13/2005 12:01:08 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson