Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaveLoneRanger

I'm a biology/philosophy student. I support stem cell research as long as it does not involve sacrificing a human life (i.e. embryonic). Underdeveloped human life is too precious for us to merely harvest a few cells to benefit a grown person. I think that it would be more beneficial to use one's own stem cells to procreate certain tissues. This way, there is less risk of rejection when, say, a diabetic individual recieves pancreatic tissue that contains his/her own genome and cellular protein receptors. Adult stem cells tend to 'behave' better than embryonic ones- they do not replicate as fast and respond better to inhibiting factors. Embryonic stem cells replicate as fast as they possibly can, and often don't respond to competitive inhibition. In a sense they have the potential to act like tumor cells. This is how adult stem cells, and even some umbilical cells, are more beneficial and even more ethical to use. I think it is great that we are improving lives of those who have congenital disease; however, we must maintain a human approach, and not pretend to be God.


13 posted on 03/13/2005 9:36:32 PM PST by Rosita_Posita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rosita_Posita

I agree. Is the scientific furor over embryonic stem cells really fueled by its potential, unproven, or by some hubristic desire to play God with a malleable life form?


16 posted on 03/25/2005 2:13:48 PM PST by dervish (Let Europe pay for NATO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson