To: Robert A. Cook, PE; massgopguy; EagleUSA; marvlus
I don't doubt that Clinton would jeopardize US security to further his political/financial interests. But when the author says that Clinton's actions were "designed" to do that, it clearly seems to indicate that such was Clinton's GOAL. I simply don't see the evidence for that.
If it's true, then Clinton is the worst traitor in US history. It would certainly be very damning of Bush 41 & 43 too, for that matter. Knowing what they know, how could they possibly fraternize with Clinton, send him off to represent the country, etc?
Don't look at me!
Bush's outright refusal to treat Clinton's crimes, and his/her crimes and their staff's corruption (and general democratic corruption such as voter fraud and Congressional refusals) has always been puzzling to me.
posted on 03/14/2005 8:40:05 AM PST
by Robert A. Cook, PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson