Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Task force urges 'North American community'
Globe and Mail ^ | March 14, 2005 | By TERRY WEBER

Posted on 03/15/2005 4:30:31 PM PST by Conservative Firster

The United States, Canada and Mexico should form a “common security perimeter” as part of a broad security and economic plan aimed at boosting trade and bolstering the continent's borders, a tri-national task for report urged Monday.

“Our vision of North America is one of three sovereign states whose formal collaboration must reflect their mutual interdependence while respecting their differences,” a joint statement issued by the task force's chairman said.

The Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is headed by former Canadian deputy prime minister John Manley, former Mexican finance minister Pedro Aspe and former Massachusetts governor William Weld.

As reported in Monday's Globe and Mail, the chairmen's statement paints a picture of a “North American community” with a unified border plan and a common external tariff.

On security, the report urges a common perimeter for the continent, with the three governments striving “toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so no matter which country he elects to enter first.”

The paper calls a move in that direction an “ambitious but achievable” goal that would require harmonization of visa and asylum regulations, entry screening and tracking procedures and full sharing of data about exit and entry of foreign nationals.

Security measures would also see enhanced law enforcement and defence co-operation. Joint defence initiatives have been a particularly contentious issue between Canada and the United States after Ottawa rejected participation in the anti-missile shield the U.S. is working to build.

All three countries, the report said, should also accelerate and expand implementation of so-called “smart border” plans to ease travel within the continent.

“The three countries should develop a secure North American border pass with biometric identifiers,” the report said. “This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customers, immigration and airport security throughout the region.”

On the economic side, the report urges the adoption of a common external tariff. That recommendation would see the three governments begin by harmonizing external tariffs on a sector-by-sector basis to the lowest prevailing rate.

“They should begin with goods on which current tariffs are closest, then proceed to close larger gaps, with the goal over time of adopting a common external tariff, thus eliminating the need for complex and costly rules of origin,” Monday's statement said.

As well, the report says the three countries should develop a North American energy and natural resource strategy and “deepen” educational ties, which would see scholarship and exchange programs expanded and cross-border training programs for teachers implemented.

The task force was jointly sponsored by the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Mexico
KEYWORDS: aliens; canada; globalism; homelandsecurity; immigration; mexico; nwo; openborders; trade; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
"smart borders"= no borders
1 posted on 03/15/2005 4:30:32 PM PST by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

How about colonizing, Christianizing, and civilizing Canada and Mexico first?


2 posted on 03/15/2005 4:33:51 PM PST by farmer18th (Compromising with absurdity is absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Welcome to USAMexiCan...

You is a what? LOL


3 posted on 03/15/2005 4:34:10 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Ping!


4 posted on 03/15/2005 4:34:37 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

How can we have a security perimeter if at least one of those two other countries is the one we need a perimeter against?


5 posted on 03/15/2005 4:35:53 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pelosi fined $21,000 for collecting/distributing funds in excess of campaign-finance laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

This is the third different article about this from canadian media. Where's our media on this?


6 posted on 03/15/2005 4:36:54 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
“Our vision of North America is one of three sovereign states whose formal collaboration must reflect their mutual interdependence while respecting their differences,”

Sorry, no respect for hosers.

7 posted on 03/15/2005 4:40:25 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: tollytee
I think the Mexican idea of border security is having security guards to aid their citizens in illegally crossing the border.

Mexico has more in common with South America than with the US, and I don't mean in terms of skin color. If only we could kick Canada over to Europe and build a wall along the Texas border, everyone's be happy. Well, *I'd* be happy, and that's what matters...;)

9 posted on 03/15/2005 4:45:10 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pelosi fined $21,000 for collecting/distributing funds in excess of campaign-finance laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

To me the North American Perimeter aka no borders is a bad idea. I don't want North America to turn into another EU.


10 posted on 03/15/2005 5:02:45 PM PST by youngtory (Rights are rights are rights. Just like a proof is a proof is a proof.-Liberal dorks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Build a foxproof fence enclosing the Fox den and the henhouse... Right.


11 posted on 03/15/2005 5:31:52 PM PST by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
Joint defence initiatives have been a particularly contentious issue between Canada and the United States after Ottawa rejected participation in the anti-missile shield the U.S. is working to build.

Yup. Canada has shown what it thinks about "our" common border security. NOTHING! (might pull money away from their firearms database boondoggle and their socialism experiment)

12 posted on 03/15/2005 7:08:35 PM PST by America's Resolve (BE PATRIOTIC! MAKE A BABY (OR TWO!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: America's Resolve

“Our vision of North America is one of three sovereign states whose formal collaboration must reflect their mutual interdependence while respecting their differences”

How much did we pay for this crud?


13 posted on 03/15/2005 8:41:29 PM PST by Owl558 (Please excuse my spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Amexicanada?


14 posted on 03/15/2005 8:43:18 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
“The three countries should develop a secure North American border pass with biometric identifiers,” the report said. “This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customers, immigration and airport security throughout the region.”

Here's the real agenda. Any excuse to get us all accustomed to carrying and showing our 'papers' that are encoded with all our personal history.

15 posted on 03/15/2005 9:50:19 PM PST by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
“Our vision of North America is one of three sovereign states whose formal collaboration must reflect their mutual interdependence while respecting their differences,” a joint statement issued by the task force's chairman said.

Si, I understand your concept. Could you elaborate in a more understanding fashion? Eh?

16 posted on 03/15/2005 11:05:14 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: JOAT

biometric identifiers = retina scans.

What's the problem with this. There would be no paperwork involved. On the other hand...I am totally 100% against a "borderless" NA. Our country would be a turd world hell hole in 18 months.


18 posted on 03/16/2005 5:43:05 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

(Premise) No Thanks!

Sounds like a EU/Socialist nation-blender experiment...


19 posted on 03/16/2005 5:46:40 AM PST by Barney59 (Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

20 posted on 03/29/2005 8:37:21 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson