Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US House slams Anti-Secession Law [US Policy on China.]
Taipei Times ^ | 18MAR05 | Charles Snyder

Posted on 03/18/2005 1:37:47 PM PST by familyop

`HISTORIC' VOTE: Supporters of the resolution against China's new law were jubilant, saying the vote will give Rice more leverage when she locks horns with Beijing.

The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly condemned China's new "Anti-Secession" Law in a vote that one of the sponsors of the House resolution called a "victory of historic proportions," as the Senate prepared to follow suit in the next day or so.

By a 424-4 vote, the House approved a resolution calling the Anti-Secession Law a matter of "grave concern" to the US, and urging the Bush administration to "direct all appropriate officials" to press this point about the law and the "growing Chinese military threats to Taiwan in general" in their contacts with Chinese officials.

Supporters of the resolution were euphoric over the vote, which came as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice began a week-long trip to Asia that will include China. Observers said the resolution should give Rice more ammunition as she complains to Chinese leaders about the law.

Praising the vote, Representative Tom Lantos, the ranking Democrat on the House International Relations Committee and one of the authors of the resolution, noted, "There was total unanimity on the part of the Congress that this is no way to approach the issue of resolving long standing problems between Taiwan and the mainland."

He called the passage of the resolution a "victory of historic proportions," saying that the Anti-Secession Law is "particularly ill-advised."

Representative Robert Wexler, one of the four co-chairman of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus, said the resolution shows that "Americans will not support any measures that change the status quo as a result of a unilateral action ... We hope that China will react responsibly and reasonably and pursue a path of peace."

Representative Steve Chabot, another co-chairman of the caucus, said that China's action in passing the Anti-Secession Law was "most unfortunate."

"It is very counter-productive, and I think they're going to regret what they've done. I think it's bad for China and clearly not in the best interest of Taiwan, either," he said.

Taipei Economic and Cultural Office Representative David Lee Ta-wei (李大維), thanked the congressmen and asked for further US support, saying "we hope the US continues to take a firm and principled position on this matter. And we hope that the US will reiterate its defense commitments to Taiwan as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, and that it will make this clear to the [People's Republic of China]."

In a ceremony on Capitol Hill after the House voted, Lee told several members of Congress who gathered to celebrate the resolution's passage of the "surprise and concern" in Taiwan in response to the Anti-Secession Law in view of some earlier positive developments in cross-strait relations.

"This sudden shift from a track of conciliation and goodwill to belligerency and threaten has understandably shaken the Taiwanese people," he said, citing the Lunar New Year flights and President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) reconciliation with People First Party chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜).

The Beijing law "seeks to impose China's will on Taiwan, shattering a long-standing status quo in which Taiwan and China have had no jurisdiction over each other for 56 years," Lee told the assembled US lawmakers.

The Beijing law also "defies the key element of the US policy toward Taiwan," that is no unilateral changes and the peaceful resolution of differences.

He made four other points in making the case that the Anti-Secession Law, in making it easier to China to engage in war with Taiwan, is "both significant and threatening."

First, it aggravates China's military threat to Taiwan. Second, it undermines the fragile stability in the Strait.

Third it "defies the fundamental basis for peace and development in the Asia Pacific region by placing China outside the regional commitment to uphold the universal values of peace, freedom, democracy, respect for human rights, and responsibility within the international community.

Fourth, it is a "direct challenge to the Taiwan Relations Act" that declares any Chinese attack on Taiwan a threat to the peace and stability of the region, and "of grave concern" to the US.

Lee also expressed the hope that in light of the anti-secession law, the EU will reconsider its decision to lift its arms embargo on China and "recognize the inherent danger of further disruption the regional balance."

In Taipei, the Presidential Office expressed gratitude over the motion passed by the US House of Representatives.

"We are thankful of the support and care extended to us from the international community during this period of time," said Presidential Office spokesman Chen Wen-tsung (陳文宗), adding that the Presidential Office believes any governments and individuals who pursue democracy and peace would find Communist China's codification of the use of "non-peaceful means" against Taiwan "unacceptable."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; china; expansionism; proliferation; taiwan; usa

1 posted on 03/18/2005 1:37:48 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

...another thread of note.

Russia army chief: against any form of "Taiwan Independence" activities
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1365243/posts


2 posted on 03/18/2005 1:39:35 PM PST by familyop (Curly Joe said, "Hey, look at the ground, look at the ground!" Essayons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Wow! Only four opposed? No red ties? No red coats?


3 posted on 03/18/2005 1:43:50 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Profile streamlined, solely devoted to comfort those crying for Terri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Let me guess, Bernie Sanders voted no?


4 posted on 03/18/2005 1:49:08 PM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Funny, they didn't oppose anti - secession in those numbers in 1861
5 posted on 03/18/2005 1:50:29 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Dang, I thought Congress was giving an ultamatum to those uppity South Carolinians who keep threatening to leave the Union over that new tariff..

...Hey, it's still 1830 isn't it?? </sarcasm>


6 posted on 03/18/2005 1:51:33 PM PST by CrimsonStater (Alabama.....A State So Red, It's Crimson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
The Communist Four:

McCollum (MN)
McDermott
Oberstar
Paul

All are Democrats except Ron Paul, who is insane.

7 posted on 03/18/2005 2:39:57 PM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CrimsonStater; PzLdr
Taiwan didn't leave China. Taiwan is where the legitimate government of China ran to when the communist revolution ocurred. Also, Taiwan was liberated from the Japanese by the United States and given to the Chinese government, (now in exile in Taiwan), to "administer". Technically, it is still US territory. The notion that Taiwan might secede is silly when it is the communist government of China which is currently in a state of mutiny while it occupies the mainland by force of tyranny.

The taiwan issue is in no way analgous to the attempted secession of the southern states.

8 posted on 03/18/2005 2:47:39 PM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel

Thanks for the info....I need to update my knowledge of the history of the Free China....things seem to be cookin' in that sphere. Time to put the hammer on the Red takeover of the Mainland China...


9 posted on 03/18/2005 2:52:18 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel
You and I may well have a disagreement about the legitimacy of the Kuomintang in 1949. And the fact Chiang Kai Shek survived as Generalissimo has less to do with his legitimacy than the 7th Fleet. I don't recall his rule, or his son's was all that popular with the Taiwanese, either.

Taiwan was a province, or some political subdivision of China long before Chiang washed up on it's shore, so the analogy ain't bad. What would have thought if the Brits and Frogs and taken the U.S position espoused now in 1861?

Does that mean I want to turn Taiwan over to the Chinese? No. But unless it's an independent country (You do remember Nixon's trip to China, and our subsequent recognition of that government?), the issue is the same it was in 1861 (perhaps more so. There was a substantial body of opinion in the antebellum US that held secession was allowed. Don't know if the Chinese have ever held that opinion-before or after Mao)
10 posted on 03/18/2005 3:04:08 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CrimsonStater

Federal power is a lot stronger when it's the Supreme Sandwich Court, or the DNC. But maybe another rabbit will come out of congress's hat. Gingrich thinks it could result in contempt. FReegards....


11 posted on 03/18/2005 3:17:55 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Profile streamlined, solely devoted to comfort those crying for Terri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

I know a state judge voted no.


12 posted on 03/18/2005 3:19:01 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Profile streamlined, solely devoted to comfort those crying for Terri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CrimsonStater

Erg. Wrong thread. Sorry about that.


13 posted on 03/18/2005 3:21:20 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Profile streamlined, solely devoted to comfort those crying for Terri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: familyop

If one reads and understands the #8 posting here, it makes all the "turmoil" appear like a Peter Sellers comedy skit.
Our elected officials have been gulled into acting like apes over this ridiculous "issue". The rest of us are guilty by association.


14 posted on 03/18/2005 3:48:58 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

Is McDermott the one that claimed to be a frontline soldier during Vietnam, but it turned out he was stateside the whole time?


15 posted on 03/18/2005 3:58:12 PM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
"Our elected officials have been gulled into acting like apes over this ridiculous "issue". The rest of us are guilty by association."

Along with rhetoric we've seen in some publications, I've been called something similar to that by many.   ;-)


16 posted on 03/18/2005 4:43:01 PM PST by familyop (Essayons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The guilty "Grog" barks first.
Dig those "abs"! Great "before" shot for a "6-pak Abs" commercial.


17 posted on 03/18/2005 5:22:15 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I suppose that the two examples are analgous in that both are cases of people trying to escape tyranny and be left alone on the land they live on. In both cases, no one probably has more claim to the land than the people living on it. I agree that people are naturally free and that any attempt to escape tyranny is legitimate. You are right that the US is being hypocritical to the extent that it could be said to be contradicting its position toward the southern states attempt to secede. I agree that Lincoln was a tyrant. He also has a few things in his favor. How's that?


18 posted on 03/18/2005 9:14:34 PM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
...except Ron Paul, who is insane.

You got that right.

19 posted on 03/18/2005 9:16:00 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr
You might find this interesting.

US Holds Nation's Sovereignty

20 posted on 03/18/2005 9:31:07 PM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

If Bagdad Jim McDermott bothered to show up, I suspect he voted no.


21 posted on 03/18/2005 9:41:22 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (Seattle Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Ron Paul is not insane and he isn't a commie. Frankly I think he is the only sane one in the entire bunch. This is on topic but not on this vote: So please take some time to watch him . Then tell me where his logic is incorrect.
22 posted on 03/18/2005 9:46:50 PM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

I hadn't read this far when I said Bagdad Jim was 1 of them - I was right. I can't believe the idiots in the city of Seattle keep voting that communist scumbag in. We need a really good candidate to run against him next time and they need some $s for campaigning.


23 posted on 03/18/2005 9:52:21 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (Seattle Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop

PING


24 posted on 03/19/2005 12:38:59 AM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Ron Paul is not insane and he isn't a commie.

I stand by my previous assessment. He probably voted 'no' because Taiwan is not mentioned by name anywhere in the U.S. Constitution and thus any vote regarding Taiwan (or China) would be unconstitutional. He must be apoplectic that we're going after Osama & Co., given that they're not specifically mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

25 posted on 03/19/2005 4:33:44 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("Thought I was having trouble with my adding. It's all right now." - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel
As they say in "Pirates of the Caribbean", "We have an accord!"
26 posted on 03/19/2005 6:25:32 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson