Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hospitals can end life support; Decision hinges on patient's ability to pay, prognosis
Houston Chronicle ^ | March 8, 2005 | LEIGH HOPPER

Posted on 03/19/2005 7:19:45 PM PST by ambrose

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: annyokie

When you get down into the details, and with real faith and trust in God, these cases really aren't as complicated as people and the media would like to make them out to be. To demand that others care for my loved ones with their resources is wrong. When my loved ones are at that point, it will be MY cross to bear, and with God's help, I will pick it up and carry it. I will feed and bathe and turn them, and make sure that they have every medication that could help, most particularly pain medication. I will do all of these simple, ordinary nursing tasks that people have done for others since time immemorial. But, where there is no reasonable hope of recovery, I think the use of extraordinary life-extending measures is selfish and wrong. So, one gets second and third and if necessary, even more opinions. And, one prays and asks for guidance. It really isn't hard.

For the record, everyone in my family dies at home of one or more of the diseases of old age. They have what is necessary-- maybe a hospital bed, intravenous feeding, and professional help in nursing if necessary. All of this is reasonable and right. They are surrounded by loving family. And, they get the pain medication that they need, unless they refuse it. They trust in God, so they are not afraid, and they use the time at the end to say goodbye and to prepare for Him. Then, God decides when the time is right, and He takes them home. I want to go the same way.

I do want to point out that many, many people makes these decisions properly, and do the right thing, even though they do not believe in God. But, He knows them, His laws are written on their hearts, and they follow Christ without knowing it.


61 posted on 03/20/2005 2:48:51 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Creating more sources with whose funds? All the tax cutters on here should scream. Buy your own health insurance and cap out at X$.


62 posted on 03/20/2005 5:24:21 PM PST by annyokie (Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: walden

We are speaking the same thing, albeit from opposite sides of the coin.


63 posted on 03/20/2005 5:26:25 PM PST by annyokie (Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Why? Where did I suggest taxes?

I do have health insurance my dear as do most people.

If there is a lack of care then we need to build more hospitals rather then resorting to primitive practices. It seems that you hold some lives to be of more value then others. That is a very slippery slope you are standing on. Careful you don't fall.

64 posted on 03/20/2005 5:39:27 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I don't have any health insurance. What are "primitive practices?"

All lives are equal. There comes a point of usefulness, and I am sorry to say it, but where should the resources go? Someone laid up forever in a hospital bed be they 6 or 60 or someone who needs a leg up when they are 25 or 30 with two kids in tow?

I'd go with the latter.


65 posted on 03/20/2005 6:33:42 PM PST by annyokie (Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
Leaving people to die because they are not "useful".

That is what you are proposing. At one time we did it for the sake of our survival as a whole. To do it when there is abundance is just sick.

If we lack resources then we should make more. You seem to think it is some sort of zero sum game. It is not. There is plenty and more can be made as needed.

Your denying someone treatment will not heroically provide treatment for others, it just will deny someone treatment. Lying to yourself about "hard choices" will not change it.

66 posted on 03/20/2005 6:43:19 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

What you are proposing in Socialism. We should artificially keep alive the sick and the lame?

As much as I loved my grandmother, I wish she had dropped dead in her kitchen from her stroke, as had her sister, rather than endured the foolish "heroic messures" that only made her children feel more important.


67 posted on 03/20/2005 7:02:10 PM PST by annyokie (Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

What heroic measures were taken that your grandmother did not want, and why were they done? Were neither you nor your mother asked to consent?


68 posted on 03/20/2005 7:02:31 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

What heroic measures were taken that your grandmother did not want, and why were they done? Were neither you nor your mother asked to consent?


69 posted on 03/20/2005 7:03:56 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: walden

My uncle took it upon himself to have grandma have brain surgery following her stroke. She thought my child was her child (they have the same name), she fell out of a chair and blacked her eye, etc.

My mother was too far away and I was in Pennsylvania (Grandma was in California.)


70 posted on 03/20/2005 7:10:45 PM PST by annyokie (Laissez les bons temps rouler !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...

This is NOT just about Terri.


71 posted on 03/20/2005 7:12:16 PM PST by narses (St James the Moor-slayer, Pray for us! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

I'm sorry. These sorts of things are made much more difficult by the geographical separation of families, and by the inability of families to agree upon the proper course of action.


72 posted on 03/20/2005 7:15:52 PM PST by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: annyokie
No Socialism is what you are proposing. You seem to think that we have twenty wounded and eighteen bandages so for the good of "society" we will use the resources only on the useful and let the other ones die.

I propose that we just make more bandages rather then acting like drama queens and engaging in "hard choices" that are totally unnecessary.

We should artificially keep alive the sick and the lame?

As opposed to sticking them on a ice flow for the polar bears?

that only made her children feel more important.

And that is why you want to force "hard choices" on everybody else? To make yourself feel important?

Stop with the drama queen bit. It cuts no ice with me.

73 posted on 03/20/2005 7:30:03 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear ( We're all doomed! Who's flying this thing!? Oh right, that would be me. Back to work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose

Hospitals are agents of the State and share the sovereign power.


75 posted on 03/23/2005 2:12:23 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Wow. 75 posts and no one has mentioned that the law referenced in the article was signed by Governor George W. Bush?


76 posted on 03/23/2005 2:16:01 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

#74 did, but he went "bye bye".


77 posted on 03/23/2005 2:18:12 PM PST by ambrose (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Did he say something else, or was that all that was required for the zot?


78 posted on 03/23/2005 2:19:11 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

He signed up today to make that comment. Most likely a troll.


79 posted on 03/23/2005 2:20:28 PM PST by ambrose (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Hmmm... If he got zotted for signing up today and making a factual statement, that's disturbing. I hope it was something a bit more inflammatory than noting that the bill became law by W's hand.

That being said, it is a bit odd that we haven't heard anyone saying that Texas law on this matter promotes a culture of death.

80 posted on 03/23/2005 2:23:26 PM PST by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson