Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Falling to Junk (General Motors going bankrupt)
The New York Sun ^ | March 22, 2005 | Editorial

Posted on 03/22/2005 2:49:46 PM PST by quidnunc

It's hard to believe that the bond rating of General Motors may soon fall to junk, but it's true. Last week, GM announced an expected loss of $850 million, about $1.50 a share, for the first three months of 2005. The company slashed its profit forecast by $2 billion for the year.

It's troubling news, obviously, for GM's shareholders and employees. But if more Americans paid attention to the troubles facing General Motors, they might grasp the urgency of America's Social Security crisis. General Motors is going bankrupt for the same reason Social Security is going under: unfunded liabilities in the form of promised benefits to retirees.

Over the decades, union leaders have won such generous pension and healthcare benefits for GM employees that today GM is the world's largest private consumer of health care, covering the medical costs of more than 1 million people. Health care represents more than $1,000 worth of cost, on average, in every vehicle General Motors produces, its chairman, Richard Wagoner, has said.

GM spends more on health care than on steel. The health-care costs — about $5.5 billion a year and growing — are fixed. GM's unfunded health-care obligations amount to $57 billion. GM also holds America's largest private pension obligation. The company estimates its total future American pension costs at $87 billion.

The company's total market valuation stood last week at $16.39 billion. General Motors was once the leading car manufacturer in the world. Today, it's a pension fund and a health maintenance organization with a relatively small car-making operation on the side.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: generalmotors; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2005 2:49:46 PM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

--the UAW better wake up ,also---


2 posted on 03/22/2005 2:51:13 PM PST by rellimpank (urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

The UAW had their glory days - now it's time to pay the piper.


3 posted on 03/22/2005 2:54:08 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Why do you say GM is going bankrupt? The article doesn't support that statement.


4 posted on 03/22/2005 2:54:41 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

When are the GM-UAW contracts up? 2007?


5 posted on 03/22/2005 2:54:50 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Always look for the union label... then buy something without it.


6 posted on 03/22/2005 2:55:46 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
"--the UAW better wake up ,also---"

Why should they? GM made the genius decision to cut a bunch of non-union labor... So that makes it pretty apparent that its the non-union labor is whats wrong with GM.

My next car will probably be an American Honda.

7 posted on 03/22/2005 2:56:00 PM PST by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

"Junk" doesn't always potend bankruptcy. Some great companies have been financied by junk bonds. That said, getting downgraded toward junk status, instead of moving in the other direction, is not good.


8 posted on 03/22/2005 2:56:29 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
GM also holds America's largest private pension obligation.

GM's pension obligation is $3 BILLION overfunded. They don't need to make a contribution through the end of the decade.

This article is alarmist "global warming" type stuff.

9 posted on 03/22/2005 2:56:38 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Why do you say GM is going bankrupt? The article doesn't support that statement.

From the excerpt:

General Motors is going bankrupt for the same reason Social Security is going under: unfunded liabilities in the form of promised benefits to retirees

10 posted on 03/22/2005 2:57:45 PM PST by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

I agree that GM is unlikely to go bankrupt. I think they have some $30e9 in cash on hand.


11 posted on 03/22/2005 2:58:17 PM PST by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

GM was praying for Kerry to start National Healthcare to bail them out.

Looks like that strategy didn't work out...so they're toast, unless they can win major concessions on their benefit obligations, which is undoubtably what the publicity blitz is all about.


12 posted on 03/22/2005 2:58:26 PM PST by Wiseghy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
General Motors was once the leading car manufacturer in the world. Today, it's a pension fund and a health maintenance organization with a relatively small car-making operation on the side.

Very sad. Reminds me of the Twentieth Century Motor Company in 'Atlas Shrugged'.

I fear the next thing is a taxpayer bailout, like Chrysler in the early '80's - 'too big to fail' theory.

13 posted on 03/22/2005 3:01:03 PM PST by GaltMeister (The only time a Democrat should be allowed in the White House is to visit the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

My daddy used to say..."Stay in school, study hard, work hard, and one day you will make more money than General Motors." Guess he was right.


14 posted on 03/22/2005 3:01:38 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death (/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
SolidSupplySide wrote: Why do you say GM is going bankrupt? The article doesn't support that statement.

From the second paragraph:

General Motors is going bankrupt for the same reason Social Security is going under: unfunded liabilities in the form of promised benefits to retirees.

15 posted on 03/22/2005 3:03:00 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steveyp

"$30e9 in cash on hand"

Is that more or less than $E83:B times $2.98? I am terrible at math.

p.s. It's getting late and I'm tired. Take no offense.


16 posted on 03/22/2005 3:04:41 PM PST by Maria S (Some church members who sing "Standing on the Promises" are just sitting on the premises.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Union Goon Alert (UAW cowards threaten worker)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1368170/posts

with crap like this I have less and less sympathy for them.


17 posted on 03/22/2005 3:06:16 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Keep drilling. Mother Nature will make more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maria S

It means about $30 billion. "e9" is scientific notation for "times 10 to the 9th power"; 10 to the 9th power is 1 billion.


18 posted on 03/22/2005 3:06:33 PM PST by thoughtomator (Will Michael Schiavo get away with murdering his wife? Stay tuned to find out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: steveyp

When bonds come due, they're not going to be paid out with free test drives.

They're junk status because the ability of GM to actually redeem the bonds is becoming less and less credible.

If GM wants, they can issue more bonds, but they'd be laughably subprime.


19 posted on 03/22/2005 3:06:52 PM PST by Rutles4Ever (Warning: may eat own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

It may be premature to call GM almost bankrupt. A lot of things the company can do and will try in the meantime. However schwab had negative credit ratings out fot both GM and Ford. GM stock is an outright sell.

My last company, Lockneed Martin went through a period wher pensions were reformed and health care costs began to be sharred between employee and company. This is the future for GM. It was not fun, and people on medicare have a better program for now. (With the average family paying half their medical costs.) What this article says is the chickens will one day come home to roost.

In the meantime, I will let my GM bonds cash out and purchase some healthcare company bonds.


20 posted on 03/22/2005 3:08:10 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Watch the coming bankruptcy of GM to bust the pensions and health care costs.


21 posted on 03/22/2005 3:09:32 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
I think the contract is up this yr. My husband worked for GM and then Delphi bought the Parts Division and he "became" a Delphi employee. When he retired ater 30 yrs people wanted to be sure they retired from GM because Delphi wouldn't have the better benefits as they thought GM would. I guess the joke is on them.

Seriously though, unions set the pace for a lot of other industries. It's just that it got taken over by thugs, sorry to say. It was the union that put a stop to workers being forced to work over 40 hrs without o/t. They have done a lot of good over the yrs but now they are corrupt!

22 posted on 03/22/2005 3:10:09 PM PST by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steveyp

I guess what it boils down to is this: Bond rating houses are not going to call "junk" on GM unless there's a serious reason to believe they have take on sizable risk. The rating could improve, but if the crux of the issue is healthcare subsidies, they're in trouble, because as far as I can tell, they can't make those go away.

The auto industry took a calculated gamble by shifting their business models from making profits on cars to making profits on their financing divisions. Automakers are essentially loan offices that sell cars, not autosellers who give loans.


23 posted on 03/22/2005 3:11:22 PM PST by Rutles4Ever (Warning: may eat own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maria S

It's getting late? It's only a little ofter 6.


24 posted on 03/22/2005 3:11:42 PM PST by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
--yep--that's usual behavior--although I consider it stupid on the part of an employer to submit to unionization after only a card-check--that's about like believing a Newsweek poll---
25 posted on 03/22/2005 3:13:15 PM PST by rellimpank (urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

the UAW does not care.

Remember Easter Airlines? Their union talked the airline tough into oblivion.

Does the UAW think they will be better off working for a non-USA corporation?


26 posted on 03/22/2005 3:13:31 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The article seems to be as much about social security as it is the GM pension liabilities..
It's an attempt to show the parrallels between the two, and to "prove" the impending failure of social security..

By 2018, the Social Security system will be in deficit, paying more in benefits than it collects in taxes. The "trust fund" will run out of assets in 2042 and face increasing shortfalls.

The article fails to point out that the last of the "baby boomers" i.e., those born in 1964, will be 100 years old in 2042..
Those that are still alive, that is..

While social security is in dire need of restructure, and protections from congressional financial shenanigans, ( virtual embezzlement ) such mis-representation and scare tactics are inexcusable..

27 posted on 03/22/2005 3:13:53 PM PST by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

"It means about $30 billion. "e9" is scientific notation for "times 10 to the 9th power"; 10 to the 9th power is 1 billion."

Well, color me informed!! I thought I was just being funny because someone had a typo. See! A math-challenged senior citizen CAN learn something new.

Thanks, MS


28 posted on 03/22/2005 3:14:27 PM PST by Maria S (Some church members who sing "Standing on the Promises" are just sitting on the premises.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Watch the coming bankruptcy of GM to bust the pensions and health care costs.

You can probably apply that to several large airlines as well.

29 posted on 03/22/2005 3:15:22 PM PST by GaltMeister (The only time a Democrat should be allowed in the White House is to visit the President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Filing for Chapter 11 and emerging from a reorganization might just be what the doctor ordered for GM.


30 posted on 03/22/2005 3:16:58 PM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
I work over 40 w/o o/t all the time.

I am salaried.

MY company has AN ENTIRE YEARS revenue, in the bank, cash.

And I am an employee-owner.

No union.

31 posted on 03/22/2005 3:16:59 PM PST by patton (Matthew 6:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dead

"Always look for the union label... then buy something without it."

You prefer "MADE IN CHINA"?


32 posted on 03/22/2005 3:18:06 PM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

You, um, studied new math, right?


33 posted on 03/22/2005 3:18:56 PM PST by patton (Matthew 6:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

"It's getting late? It's only a little ofter 6."

If you've been up since 2 a.m., it's late...believe me.


34 posted on 03/22/2005 3:19:08 PM PST by Maria S (Some church members who sing "Standing on the Promises" are just sitting on the premises.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: All
Does this mean Dale Jr. will start driving Fords now?
36 posted on 03/22/2005 3:19:39 PM PST by yellowhammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Time to cut Payroll!
37 posted on 03/22/2005 3:20:28 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The health-care costs — about $5.5 billion a year and growing

Something doesn't look right here... GM has 324,000 employees... so this works out to be almost $17,000/year/employee in Health Care costs.

I work at a manufacturing company... we are working to drive down our health care costs at our division because we are WELL ABOVE the national average in heath care cost/employee at around $7,000/employee. National average IIRC is around $4,500/employee.

38 posted on 03/22/2005 3:22:11 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

All this, and they don't have a single car that everyone is talking about.


39 posted on 03/22/2005 3:24:37 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

The coming health care crisis is going to hit more than just the uninsured, the poorly-run companies are going to see problems first. In five or ten years, the rest of the system goes into full collapse.


40 posted on 03/22/2005 3:26:38 PM PST by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
The article fails to point out that the last of the "baby boomers" i.e., those born in 1964, will be 100 years old in 2042..

I'm not claiming to be a math whiz, but I'd check your numbers.

41 posted on 03/22/2005 3:26:38 PM PST by gogeo (Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Here : "General Motors is going bankrupt for the same reason Social Security is going under: unfunded liabilities in the form of promised benefits to retirees"


42 posted on 03/22/2005 3:26:42 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

That number includes retiree benefits, which is what's really killing GM.


43 posted on 03/22/2005 3:27:51 PM PST by gogeo (Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xzins
xzins wrote: All this, and they don't have a single car that everyone is talking about.

They're talking about the new Ponticac G6, but what they're saying is that it has been a flop.

44 posted on 03/22/2005 3:31:38 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Let us not forget that southern Ontario has subsidized the auto sector to a highly valued position: southern Ontario now out-produces Michigan in auto production. The cruel irony is that as their dependence on American companies for jobs grow, the shrill anti-Americanism also grows.


45 posted on 03/22/2005 3:32:28 PM PST by canadianally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide


GM is worth 27 billion...they have outstanding debt well in excess of 100 billion.


>>>>GM's pension obligation is $3 BILLION overfunded. They don't need to make a contribution through the end of the decade.


46 posted on 03/22/2005 3:33:15 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
It was the union that put a stop to workers being forced to work over 40 hrs without o/t. They have done a lot of good over the yrs but now they are corrupt!
Wrong on the 40-hour week. (Right on corrupt.)

A standard 40hour week is a union creation that defies the historical reality of automotive production. The automotive business is both cyclical and seasonal. It was the New Deal that imposed 30, 35, 40-hour weeks upon the industry, which, in turn, created this idea of "over time," which never before existed. The industry tried and tried to explain to the morons of the "brain trust" that fewer hours in November plus extra hours in April added up to the same as even hours all year long.

Besides, auto factory workers regularly got extra pay for extra work, for that meant $$ for the factory. "Piece-work," which the New Deal outlawed, was an excellent moderator of work flow and wages, and it was the best way for smaller manufacturers to compete with the Big Three, which otherwise creamed the rest on scale and productivity. When FDR and the UAW imposed regularity on auto employment, they merely assured that there would be fewer automobile producers, and, thus, fewer overall workers.

Yes, unions have brought benefits to workers. But they've taken away more money from the workplace in general than they've given to those workers they represent.

Nicollo unmasked: Bromleyisms here

47 posted on 03/22/2005 3:34:49 PM PST by nicollo (All economics are politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
They have done a lot of good over the yrs but now they are corrupt!

Yup the UAW has become what they organized to prevent
Contract is up in 2007
I only have a little over 2 years left and I am laid off right now myself

48 posted on 03/22/2005 3:36:12 PM PST by apackof2 (optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

:>)

GM has a fleet of the same car...some more $ and some less $, but all the same with a different name.

If they come out with a 40 mpg SUV with 2/3 the power of a Yukon and a price in the low 20's and a warranty in the 100,000 range, then they'll move more vehicles than Japan, Korea, and Germany combined.


49 posted on 03/22/2005 3:42:03 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: canadianally

Who would have thought that national health care would become a competitive advantage?


50 posted on 03/22/2005 3:43:35 PM PST by gogeo (Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson