Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starved for justice (ANN COULTER re: Schiavo)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 3/23/05 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 03/23/2005 3:43:40 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy

Democrats have called out armed federal agents in order to: 1) prevent black children from attending a public school in Little Rock, Ark. (National Guard), 2) investigate an alleged violation of federal gun laws in Waco, Texas (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms), and 3) deport a small boy to Cuba (Immigration and Naturalization Service).

So how about a Republican governor sending in the National Guard to stop an innocent American woman from being starved to death in Florida? Republicans like the military. Democrats get excited about the use of military force only when it's against Americans.

In two of the three cases mentioned above, the Democrats' use of force was in direct contravention of court rulings. Admittedly, this was a very long time ago – back in U.S. history when the judiciary was only one of the three branches of our government. Democratic Gov. Orval Faubus called out the Arkansas National Guard expressly for purposes of defying rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts.

The decadent buffoon Bill Clinton sent armed agents from the INS to seize a small boy from an American family – despite rulings by the majestic and infallible Florida courts granting custody of the boy to that very family.

None of these exercises of military force has gone down in history as a noble moment, but that's because of the underlying purpose of the force, not the fact that force was used.

To the contrary, what has gone down in history as a glorious moment for the republic was when President Dwight Eisenhower (Republican) called out military force of his own. In response to Gov. Faubus' abuse of the National Guard, Eisenhower simultaneously revoked Faubus' control of the National Guard and ordered the 101st Airborne Division to escort black students to school. (Minutes later, Democrats pronounced the Arkansas public schools a "hopeless quagmire" and demanded to know what Ike's exit strategy was.)

As important as it was to enforce the constitutional right to desegregated schools, isn't it also important to enforce Terri Schiavo's right to due process before she is killed by starvation?

Liberals' newfound respect for "federalism" is completely disingenuous. People who support a national policy on abortion are prohibited from ever using the word "federalism."

I note that whenever liberals talk about "federalism" or "states' rights," they are never talking about a state referendum or a law passed by the duly elected members of a state legislature – or anything voted on by the actual citizens of a state. What liberals mean by "federalism" is: a state court ruling. Just as "choice" refers to only one choice, "the rule of law" refers only to "the law as determined by a court."

As a practical matter, courts will generally have the last word in interpreting the law because courts decide cases. But that's a pragmatic point. There is nothing in the law, the Constitution or the concept of "federalism" that mandates giving courts the last word. Other public officials, including governors and presidents, are sworn to uphold the law, too.

It would be chaotic if public officials made a habit of disregarding court rulings simply because they disagreed with them. But a practice borne of practicality has led the courts to greater and greater flights of arrogance. Sublimely confident that no one will ever call their bluff, courts are now regularly discovering secret legal provisions requiring abortion and gay marriage and prohibiting public prayer and Ten Commandments displays.

Just once, we need an elected official to stand up to a clearly incorrect ruling by a court. Any incorrect ruling will do, but my vote is for a state court that has ordered a disabled woman to be starved to death at the request of her adulterous husband.

Florida state court Judge George Greer – last heard from when he denied an order of protection to a woman weeks before her husband stabbed her to death – determined that Terri would have wanted to be starved to death based on the testimony of her husband, who was then living with another woman. (The judge also took judicial notice of the positions of O.J. Simpson, Scott Peterson and Robert Blake.) The husband also happened to be the only person present when the oxygen was cut off to Terri's brain in the first place. He now has two children with another woman.

Greer has refused to order the most basic medical tests for brain damage before condemning a woman to death. Despite all those years of important, searching litigation we keep hearing about, Terri has yet to receive either an MRI or a PET scan – although she may be allowed to join a support group for women whose husbands are trying to kill them.

Greer has cut off the legal rights of Terri's real family and made her husband (now with a different family) her sole guardian, citing as precedent the landmark "Fox v. Henhouse" ruling of 1893. Throughout the process that would result in her death sentence, Terri was never permitted her own legal counsel. Evidently, they were all tied up defending the right to life of child-molesting murderers.

Given the country's fetishism about court rulings, this may be a rash assumption, but I presume if Greer had ordered that Terri Schiavo be shot at her husband's request – a more humane death, by the way – the whole country would not sit idly by, claiming to be bound by the court's ruling because of the "rule of law" and "federalism." President Bush would order the FBI to protect her and Gov. Bush would send in the state police.

What was supposed to be the "least dangerous" branch has become the most dangerous – literally to the point of ordering an innocent American woman to die, and willfully disregarding congressional subpoenas. They can't be stopped – solely because the entire country has agreed to treat the pronouncements of former ambulance-chasers as the word of God. The only power courts have is that everyone jumps when they say "jump." (Also, people seem a little intimidated by the black robes. From now on we should make all judges wear lime-green leisure suits.)

President Andrew Jackson is supposed to have said of a Supreme Court ruling he opposed: "Well, John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it." The court's ruling was ignored. And yet, somehow, the republic survived.

If Gov. Jeb Bush doesn't say something similar to the Florida courts that have ordered Terri Schiavo to die, he'll be the second Republican governor disgraced by the illiterate ramblings of a state judiciary. Gov. Mitt Romney will never recover from his acquiescence to the Massachusetts Supreme Court's miraculous discovery of a right to gay marriage. Neither will Gov. Bush if he doesn't stop the torture and murder of Terri Schiavo.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; cary; coulter; righttolife; schaivo; schiavo; schiavos; terri; terris; terrischaivo; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Ann's latest for y'all. Enjoy.

1 posted on 03/23/2005 3:43:41 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libertina; Vicki; Spanaway Lori; Baynative
PING (maybe this will get me out of the WA dog house for being contrary)
2 posted on 03/23/2005 3:47:56 PM PST by llevrok (Born a ham and never cured!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
Admittedly, this was a very long time ago – back in U.S. history when the judiciary was only one of the three branches of our government.

Right on.

3 posted on 03/23/2005 3:47:56 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

HUH??...oh sorry I had my mind somewhere else


4 posted on 03/23/2005 3:47:57 PM PST by sierrahome (What's the Cuban national anthem? "Row, Row, Row Your Boat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Annie comes through again. Most of the big guns have weighed in on the right side by now.


5 posted on 03/23/2005 3:48:15 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Thank you Ann!


6 posted on 03/23/2005 3:49:34 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
Democrats get excited about the use of military force only when it's against Americans.

So sad, so true.

7 posted on 03/23/2005 3:50:02 PM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Cutting, witty, brilliant in a way that everyone can understand. She's very good.


8 posted on 03/23/2005 3:50:13 PM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

"Just once, we need an elected official to stand up to a clearly incorrect ruling by a court. Any incorrect ruling will do, but my vote is for a state court that has ordered a disabled woman to be starved to death at the request of her adulterous husband."

Thank you Ann. Exactly what I have been saying for days.


9 posted on 03/23/2005 3:50:58 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

S w e e t, AZ_C!


10 posted on 03/23/2005 3:53:25 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm ( Veni Vidi Vino Visa "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

only ann could find a way to make me laugh today. thanks.


11 posted on 03/23/2005 3:54:27 PM PST by lonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

The guy on the top right looks like Sam Giancanna. I thought he died.


12 posted on 03/23/2005 3:56:31 PM PST by duckman (I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

As always, Ann speaks for me and all REAL AMERICANS. BRAVO!!


13 posted on 03/23/2005 3:56:47 PM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

I have been DYING to hear her take! THANK YOU! I LOVE THIS WOMAN!!


14 posted on 03/23/2005 3:57:04 PM PST by pkp1184
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: speedy; AZ_Cowboy; sierrahome; Recovering_Democrat; llevrok
"citing as precedent the landmark "Fox v. Henhouse" ruling of 1893."

Love that woman. There were some good zingers in here again, but this one jumped out the most.

16 posted on 03/23/2005 3:58:57 PM PST by Enterprise (President George W. Bush - the leading insurgent detergent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
Ann Coulter could make one call to her friend Matt Drudge and this whole situation could have turned. I firmly believe if the public got wind of Michael Schiavo and his past/present actions the outcry would have been there. Instead the masses believe this woman is a vegetable and Michael is an innocent victim.

Drudge could have highlighted on his website affidavits from Terri's nurse Carla Iyer stating "when is that B--ch going to die". Drudge could have highlighted the other doctors and nurses witnessing Terri's condition. He could have headlined the O'Reilly guest that was misdiagnosed in a PVS state and had starvation attempted on her. Her story was right out of Edgar Allen Poe.

Drudge could have highlighted the ABC polls being push polls or the ABC/Washington Post Republican memo story as being a democrat dirty trick.

What does Coulter's friend Drudge chose to expose today: a Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie and a story about a GOP adviser dying of drugs.

Coulter's efforts could have been more useful in getting publicity on the facts of this story rather than writing a piece complaining about others inaction.
17 posted on 03/23/2005 4:01:11 PM PST by Republican Red (DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
What was supposed to be the "least dangerous" branch has become the most dangerous – literally to the point of ordering an innocent American woman to die, and willfully disregarding congressional subpoenas.

40 million dead Americans and counting.

18 posted on 03/23/2005 4:01:48 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

self ping


19 posted on 03/23/2005 4:03:05 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

I think she forgot about shooting Randy Weavers son and Wife, since Randy wouldn't be an informant.


20 posted on 03/23/2005 4:04:00 PM PST by Bostton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson