Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DA calls Blake jury "stupid"
Seattle Times ^ | 03/24/2005 | Richard Winton

Posted on 03/24/2005 5:04:36 AM PST by Hawk44

LOS ANGELES — Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley said jurors who acquitted actor Robert Blake of the murder of his wife are "incredibly stupid" and insisted his office had put on a good case.

In his first comments on the high-profile loss, Cooley said the verdict shows prosecuting celebrities is extremely difficult in Los Angeles.

"The Blake case taught us some lessons, that is for sure," Cooley said. "Quite frankly, based on my review of the evidence, he is as guilty as sin. He is a miserable human being."

Chuck Safko, one of the jurors who voted to acquit Blake, answered with scorn of his own.

"To hear him say we aren't a smart jury is sour grapes," Safko said. "They didn't have a good case. Their case was built around witnesses who weren't truthful."

Blake, 71, was accused of murdering his wife on May 4, 2001, mainly based on the word of two Hollywood stuntmen who testified the actor tried to hire them to kill her. Only two jurors ever thought Blake might be guilty, according to interviews after the verdict, and all 12 came to the unanimous verdict of not guilty after two weeks of deliberations.

The comment shows Cooley is "small-minded," said Blake's attorney, Gerald Schwartzbach. It was worthy of a politician, not a lawyer, Schwartzbach said.

Cooley's comments were unusual, but not unethical, according to legal experts.

"To criticize the jurors is unprofessional — it is unbelievable," said Laurie Levinson, a professor of criminal law at Loyola Law School. "I think you have to give the jury credit. They are very conscientious jury. It was a reasonable-doubt case, and disagreeing with Mr. Cooley doesn't make them stupid."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: evidence; incompetence; jury; murder; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
An incompetent prosecutor who had no case calls the jury stupid. Hello!
1 posted on 03/24/2005 5:04:37 AM PST by Hawk44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Unfortunately the Jacko prosecution thus far seems as incompetent, if not moreso than the Blake prosecution.


2 posted on 03/24/2005 5:05:53 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Did he have residue on his hands after the shot was fired into the woman's head?


3 posted on 03/24/2005 5:07:07 AM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

HUMMM, he has been found legally not guilty. i wonder how fast Blakes lawyers can file a defamation lawsuit.


4 posted on 03/24/2005 5:07:40 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

The customer is always right.


5 posted on 03/24/2005 5:08:55 AM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
Los Angeles County District Attorney Steve Cooley said jurors who acquitted actor Robert Blake of the murder of his wife are "incredibly stupid" and insisted his office had put on a good case.

That's right, blame the stupid voters that elected you.

SO9

6 posted on 03/24/2005 5:08:59 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
An incompetent prosecutor who had no case calls the jury stupid. Hello!

I don't usually follow celebrity cases, but it looked to me like the jury did not buy the Prooscetuion's case, in part because the murder victim had a history that produced a list of suspects as large as the Manhattan Yellow Pages.

7 posted on 03/24/2005 5:09:38 AM PST by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
"Quite frankly, based on my review of the evidence, he is as guilty as sin. He is a miserable human being."

Unfortunately for the Prosecutor, the person Blake was accused of murdering was an even more miserable human being.

8 posted on 03/24/2005 5:10:02 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

In this case, he's absolutely correct. Same was true for the OJ jury, so any Los Angeles DA should prepare for the "stupid jury effect."


9 posted on 03/24/2005 5:10:16 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Nope. That was a big cause of concern for the jury. No GSR.


10 posted on 03/24/2005 5:10:39 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Pull up a chair and watch history being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

I didn't watch or follow any of the trial, but I did see jury members speak afterward. They seemed like intelligent people for the most part. The foreman said the fact there was no gunshot residue on Blake and that many of the prosecution's witnesses are known liars led to reasonable doubt.


11 posted on 03/24/2005 5:12:43 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Pull up a chair and watch history being made.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

What does it say about him if he can't even convince a stupid jury that he's right?


12 posted on 03/24/2005 5:12:45 AM PST by Ragnorak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Letterman had a joke on that the other day, "Blake thanks his crack legal team, the judge, and the jury of 12 good dumbasses."


13 posted on 03/24/2005 5:12:52 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

All I know is...........CALIFORNIA


14 posted on 03/24/2005 5:13:08 AM PST by jmq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
What is it with incompetent Los Angeles prosecutors?

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

15 posted on 03/24/2005 5:13:59 AM PST by mhking (If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

The defense proved that the victim was a slut.


16 posted on 03/24/2005 5:14:43 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Their strongest evidence against him was his involvement in the 'He-Man Woman Hater's Club'.


17 posted on 03/24/2005 5:15:40 AM PST by Reform4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44

Are all these California DAs as dumb as this one and the one at the OJ trail and the one in SanFrancisco and and and on and on?


18 posted on 03/24/2005 5:17:32 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

The DA is also indicting his own ability to choose jurors.


19 posted on 03/24/2005 5:18:02 AM PST by Rebelbase (FR has gone "All Terri All The Time".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hawk44
DA calls Blake jury "stupid"

He participated in the jury selection process.

No lawyer worth his salt blames the jury if he loses a case he thinks he should have won. He looks inward to figure out how he failed to get his message to the jury.

20 posted on 03/24/2005 5:19:30 AM PST by CharacterCounts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson