Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Dump Lamar's billion-dollar-boondoggle
CFP ^ | March 28, 2005 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 03/28/2005 10:28:00 AM PST by MikeEdwards

Rage over rising gasoline prices and increased oil imports should be directed at Bill Clinton and Senate Democrats. Had Bill Clinton not vetoed the 1995 budget, oil from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would now be providing nearly a million barrels per day to American markets--about the same amount we are importing from Saudi Arabia.

In every Congress since 1995, Senate Democrats have killed every effort to utilize our own oil reserves. Finally, by the narrowest of votes (51-49), Senate Republicans passed the ANWR resolution which will not be vetoed by President Bush. Still, it will take another decade to get this oil flowing.

Democrats, and a powerful environmental lobby, are committed to stopping ANWR production. Using a litany of lies and disinformation, ANWR opponents are gearing up for an all-out war.

Environmentalists contend that drilling in ANWR will "destroy" the refuge. That’s a lie. They said the same thing about drilling in Prudhoe Bay, which was home to about 3,000 Caribou before drilling began. Now, after 30 years of drilling, the herd numbers are nearing 36,000.

Environmentalists contend that drilling in ANWR will produce only "a few months" of oil at national consumption rates. That’s deliberate disinformation. At one million barrels per day, which is all the additional oil the Alaska pipeline can carry, it would take nearly three years to pump a billion barrels to the lower states. The low end of the estimated reserves is about five billion barrels. That’s about 15 years of oil. The mean estimate is about 10 billion barrels, and the field could have as much as 16 billion barrels of oil. That’s a far cry from the "few months" supply that opponents continually preach. . . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; anwr; artic; barrels; energy; environment; million; national; oil; pipeline; refuge; wildlife

1 posted on 03/28/2005 10:28:08 AM PST by MikeEdwards
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

What is your point in posting this?


2 posted on 03/28/2005 10:30:09 AM PST by jrestrepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

The few months arguement assumes that if we would only used ANWR as our sole source of oil it would run out in a few months. Which is true, but we should still go and get it.


3 posted on 03/28/2005 10:32:39 AM PST by CollegeRepublican (South Park, Simpson's loving Republican here!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrestrepo
Did you read it? It's a drilling advocacy and liberals misrepresent kind of piece.
4 posted on 03/28/2005 10:35:26 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366853/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
Just wait until we start making electricity with a nearly pollution free method in which the US has tons of resources - and that the French like also...

Nuclear - the liberal environmental wackos heads will explode...
5 posted on 03/28/2005 10:38:26 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
I really do not care what left-wing anti-American, anti-People evniornamelist say. Drill the oil in ALASKA AND OFF THE COST OF FLORIDA.
6 posted on 03/28/2005 10:44:26 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards
To be honest with you, the oil to me is almost secondary (I would prefer nuke power and competition with free market prices and with a variety providing supply).

However, whatever is in this wasteland should be drilled, and it would be an improvement.

This area the size of south carolina has one small part which is hell on earth which is where they want to drill, if there was no oil there, then I would prefer to bomb the place into oblivion.

7 posted on 03/28/2005 10:50:59 AM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

I did read it, but I was trying to discern your intent. Now I know. Thanks!


8 posted on 03/28/2005 11:19:15 AM PST by jrestrepo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeEdwards

Start the drilling, now!

Drill early and drill often!


9 posted on 03/28/2005 11:28:30 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

don't forget the coast of California. They outlawed
drilling there because of a well publicized spill in
the 60's(?). I can think of nothing better than a few
rigs right off Malibu ...


10 posted on 03/28/2005 11:31:55 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jrestrepo
"I did read it, but I was trying to discern your intent. Now I know. Thanks!"

Not my intent. I didn't post the article but was just tryin to help a FReeper out. FReegards.
11 posted on 03/28/2005 11:56:46 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366853/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
Is Malibu anywhere near Santa Barbara?

I can reassure everyone that if oil from all sources outside of California were nor permitted there, they couldn't get oil rigs built out there fast enough...

12 posted on 03/28/2005 11:58:07 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Agree!!!! Thanks I forgot that one.


13 posted on 03/28/2005 12:11:41 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blackie
blackie wrote:
Drill early and drill often!
You plagiarized that from the DNC's motto: "vote early and vote often"!
14 posted on 03/29/2005 8:21:03 AM PST by MikeEdwards
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

"if oil from all sources outside of California were nor permitted there, they couldn't get oil rigs built out there fast enough"

California has at least 800 years of supply of known reserves but 1000 years supply of enviro nut cases!


15 posted on 03/29/2005 8:28:16 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson