Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IDF: Prepare for terror state in Gaza ["...possibly resulting in far higher IDF casualties."]
Jerusalem Newswire ^ | 10/19/2004 | Jerusalem Newswire Editorial Staff

Posted on 03/30/2005 10:26:20 AM PST by Yehuda

IDF: Prepare for terror state in Gaza

By Jerusalem Newswire Editorial Staff

October 19th, 2004

JERUSALEM - Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza would likely result in the coastal strip becoming “a terrorist entity where anarchy prevails,” according to newly revealed IDF documents.

The serious security threat posed by a Gaza left to the “Palestinians” has prompted the IDF to already begin preparing for the day it will have to reenter the Strip.

In related news, the results of a new public opinion poll show a majority of the Palestinian Arabs continues to support hostilities against the Jewish state.

Gaza terror state

The in-depth IDF documents, reported on by Ma’ariv’s Amir Rapaport at the weekend, are part of the army’s meticulous planning process for leaving Gaza.

They list 13 possible security threats to southern Israel directly resulting from the implementation of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s policies vis-à-vis the Strip.

Those threats include sniper attacks on Israeli farmers in the western Negev, attacks on IDF patrols along the Gaza security fence, and the kidnapping and holding of Israeli soldiers inside Gaza.

Additionally, the documents note that at present, “Palestinian” forces fire Kassam rockets at Negev towns from deep inside Gaza. Following the withdrawal, they would be able to launch from just beyond the Gaza border, greatly increasing their strike range.

Rapaport pointed out that Sharon’s farm, which lies just beyond the Negev town of Sderot, would be within range of the homemade rockets.

Of greatest concern to the army, however, was the possibility that “Palestinian” forces in Gaza would obtain anti-aircraft missiles and long-range rockets following Israel’s departure.

With such a serious list of threats, the IDF said it was already preparing for the day it would have to reenter Gaza.

When that day comes, and security officials are sure it will, Israeli forces will find themselves battling a far more entrenched enemy, possibly resulting in far higher IDF casualties.

Translation of the Ma’ariv article was provided by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

‘Palestinians’ still want war

Meanwhile, a majority of “Palestinians” said they still support the use of violence against Israel’s Jews.

Between October 11 and 15, the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion surveyed a random sampling of 570 Arab adults from Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.

When asked if they “support the continuation” of what the Arabs calls the “Al Aqsa Intifada,” 49.6 percent responded in the affirmative. Forty-two percent said they would like to see an end to the violence.

The results again refute constant claims by Western governments that the “Palestinian” terrorist campaign against Israel is a minority phenomenon that does not enjoy popular support.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: appeasment; deathfromtheleft; terror; terrorism

1 posted on 03/30/2005 10:26:21 AM PST by Yehuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

The only reason why I can imagine that Sharon doing this is he knows the Palestinians are going to return to terror, and then he will say "see, we told you", and go back in and root them out.

Otherwise, he is a fool.


2 posted on 03/30/2005 10:28:18 AM PST by tomahawk (http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

Keep in mind that Sharon is, at heart and in experience, a brilliant military strategist. In returning Gaza to the Palestinians, he is concentrating terrorists, making retaliation easier logistically.

Gaza was Philistine territory in Old Testament times, never a part of ancient Israel.


3 posted on 03/30/2005 10:31:18 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
"The only reason why I can imagine that Sharon doing this is he knows the Palestinians are going to return to terror, and then he will say "see, we told you", and go back in and root them out. Otherwise, he is a fool."

He's doing it to keep his son out of jail.

Recall that Sharon TROUNCED his labor opponent in the last election, which hinged almost completely on unilateral withdrawal (SHARON OPPOSED IT).

Sharon's son was to be arrested on corruption charges (that probably went up to the dad) and miraculously, the charges went away the day after Sharon 180'd on withdrawing from Gaza.

Completely coinkidink, the Atty General who was pursuing Sharon's son and who then dropped the investigation IS FROM THE TERROR APPEASING LABOR PARTY.
4 posted on 03/30/2005 10:36:56 AM PST by Yehuda (America: Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

Exactly. I have always thought it is the Palestinians who are walking into a trap, not the Israelis. I believe there is a strong possibility of a Palestinian civil war after the Israeli withdrawal, which is what Sharon thinks (and hopes for). It would warm the cockles of my heart to see these terrorist thugs fighting each other. The civilized world would benefit immeasurably from such a scenario.


5 posted on 03/30/2005 10:39:00 AM PST by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda; SJackson; yonif; Happy2BMe; Simcha7; American in Israel; Binyamin; Taiwan Bocks; ...






If you'd like to be on or off this
Christian Supporters of Israel ping list,
please FR mail me. ~
  -  -
MikeFromFR ~
There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had
spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass. (Joshua 21:45)

Letter To The President In Support Of Israel ~
'Final Solution,' Phase 2 ~
Warnings ~
6 posted on 03/30/2005 10:43:59 AM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Keep in mind that Sharon is, at heart and in experience, a brilliant military strategist. In returning Gaza to the Palestinians, he is concentrating terrorists, making retaliation easier logistically.

G-d willing you are right, but somehow giving them a port and then setting himself up for this contiguous corridor from Gaza to Judea-Samaria that rice is screaming for seems prety stupid.

Then again, maybe the port will make for quicker shipping OUT...

"Gaza was Philistine territory in Old Testament times, never a part of ancient Israel."

WADR, that's not completely accurate:

The history of Gaza goes back to remotest antiquity and is mentioned 18 times in the Torá.

Gaza is where Samson toppled the Philistines, arch-enemies of the Jews. Like Judea and Samaria, Gaza had its Jews expelled, and has been occupied by numerous foreign civilizations. The Israelites who had been in Gaza before the time of Samson (Judges, 16:1), were still in possession of it in the time of Solomon (Kings I:4:1). After the Babylonian captivity (the first Diaspora and one we have not recovered from), the Persians had occupied Gaza, which at the time a large coastal trading city. It was there along the coast in Gaza where the shekels Nehemiah spoke of in the Tanakh were minted. In 332 BCE the Persian empire collapsed, and Judea became a Greek province. When Alexander the Macedonian went from Tyre to Egypt, he savagely took Gaza putting to death all the men and selling the women and children as slaves. He left a garrison of soldiers in Gaza, but eventually the city repopulated and thrived.

Even though the Greeks had been occupying Gaza, Jewish hopes of regaining the land were always there, just as they were with other cities in Erets Israel. When Gaza and most of Erets Israel was occupied by the Syrian Hellenists who had set in motion the destruction of Judaism, it was Jonathan Maccabee the Kohen Gadol (high priest) and Jewish warrior who ordered Gaza to open its gates. When the Greeks refused, Jonathan and his army of Jewish soldiers destroyed the suburbs around Gaza by burning them down, and by 143 BCE the city was open to him. From Gaza to Damascus Jonathan had fought to liberate Jewish cities of idolatry. Unfortunately, it was short lived, it did not take long for Hellenism to resurface and once again spread down to Gaza.

7 posted on 03/30/2005 10:47:18 AM PST by Yehuda (America: Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

The separation policy is one of those things that if I believed it would ever be implemented as is has been put forth I would support it. Trouble is, I do NOT believe it will ever be fully implemented, and that it will simply result in Israel giving up more Land for "Peace." But then, I'm not an Israeli. Tell you what, though... I went to shoot at the pistol range the other day and there were some rather wild eyed arabs next to me, and I couldn't help thinking... "what if they decide to shoot me?" They were damn good pistoleers with some heavy caliber ammo as well.


8 posted on 03/30/2005 10:52:00 AM PST by johnb838 (Thy Will, Not Mine, Be Done; No abortion, no euthanazia. NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

Thanks for that link to the entire article. Good info to keep on hand.


9 posted on 03/30/2005 10:58:09 AM PST by lupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

You are right. My statement about Gaza's history was an oversimplification. I should have just referred to its history as disputed territory and headquarters for the Philistines, enemies of Israel.

Handing over Gaza does not stir in me the same deep emotion as seeing the Temple Mount, Bethlehem, Hebron (Mamre, Machpelah, etc.) under terrorist control.

Sharon has fought in every war for modern Israel, beginning as just a kid. I believe the old warrior is setting up another. Keep in mind what he did in crossing Suez between two opposing armies during the Yom Kippur war. He is ruthless and fearless, and it would be out of character for him to turn touchy-feely at this point in his life.


10 posted on 03/30/2005 11:03:23 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
This article is from October of last year, and yet reads like today's news. I found this interesting:

Of greatest concern to the army, however, was the possibility that "Palestinian" forces in Gaza would obtain anti-aircraft missiles and long-range rockets following Israel's departure.

I thought I read of some "new weapons" that the palis are bragging about putting into use against Israel after this latest hudna is over. Could they be weapons mentioned in the above quote?

11 posted on 03/30/2005 11:23:28 AM PST by Reborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
"Gaza was Philistine territory in Old Testament times, never a part of ancient Israel."

Really?

The Kingdoms of David and Solomon: 1077 - 997 BCE

King David ruled Israel from 990 BCE to 968 BCE; and his son Solomon ruled after him until 928 BCE. David enlarged his kingdom and brought it to the peak of political and military power. Solomon "ruled over all the kingdoms west of the Euphrates River from Tiphsah to Gaza; he was at peace with all his neighbors" (I Kings, 4:24).

12 posted on 03/30/2005 11:44:21 AM PST by sarah_f ( Know Islam, Know Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sarah_f

Relax and read my mea culpa in Post#10, when I agreed that I should have just referred to Gaza as disputed territory.

Lots of Israelite history was written over battles and tangles with the cities of Gaza. It was a Philistine stronghold in ancient times, and I find some poetry in corraling terrorists there today.


13 posted on 03/30/2005 11:54:26 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

Yes. If the Palestinians continue their terror, Israel will have every right, without question, to go in and clean house.


14 posted on 03/30/2005 12:02:08 PM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

If they shoot down an aircraft isn't that a declaration ow war ? Anything goes after that.


15 posted on 03/30/2005 12:25:53 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salem; IAF ThunderPilot

Ping!


16 posted on 03/30/2005 12:36:34 PM PST by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huckfillary

Good point. Let the fifty percent that want to be terrorists go to Gaza and have a civil war. It would save the IDF doing it.


17 posted on 03/30/2005 12:39:21 PM PST by kingsurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Alouette

Ping!


18 posted on 03/30/2005 12:41:34 PM PST by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson