Skip to comments.An Early Wartime Profile Depicts a Tormented Hitler
Posted on 03/30/2005 7:12:00 PM PST by neverdem
He was a feminine boy, averse to manual work, who was "annoyingly subservient" to superior officers as a young soldier and had nightmares that were "very suggestive of homosexual panic." The mass killings that he later perpetrated stemmed in part from a desperate loathing of his own submissive weakness, and the humiliations of being beaten by a sadistic father.
What is believed to be the first psychological profile of Hitler commissioned by the Office of Strategic Services, a predecessor to the Central Intelligence Agency, was posted this month by Cornell University Law Library on its Web site (www.lawschool.cornell.edu/library/donovan/hitler/). Although declassified some years ago, the report, written in 1943, has not been widely cited or available to the public, historians and librarians at Cornell say.
The library published the analysis after receiving permission from a relative of its author, the late Dr. Henry A. Murray, a prominent personality expert at Harvard in the middle of the last century. The document's release was reported on Tuesday on the Fox News program "The Big Story With John Gibson."
"For a long time, people thought there was only one psychological profile of Hitler commissioned by the O.S.S.," said Dr. Jerrold M. Post, a professor of psychiatry at George Washington University and the founder of the C.I.A.'s psychological branch, referring to a wartime report by Dr. Walter C. Langer that formed the basis of his 1972 book, "The Mind of Adolf Hitler."
Dr. Langer, a noted psychoanalyst, died in 1981. Dr. Murray was among several psychoanalysts who had worked with him in profiling Hitler for the O.S.S., and the Murray profile was apparently incorporated into the later, more definitive Langer account.
It is clear that this earlier profile added to the definitive profile of Hitler, Dr. Post said, "and very few people have known that it even exists."
Dr. Post said he came upon a draft of the Murray profile in 2000 while researching a book of his own, "The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders."
Some experts, including Dr. Post himself, are not convinced that the report is without significant shortcomings.
The posted document is a condensed version of Dr. Murray's evaluation, a mixture of psychoanalytic theorizing, speculation and lurid detail about Hitler's life that could have come from a crime novel. In an authoritative voice, Dr. Murray diagnoses in Hitler neurosis, hysteria, paranoia, Oedipal tendencies, schizophrenia, "infinite self-abasement" and "syphilophobia," which he describes as a fear of contamination of the blood through contact with a woman. But the document refers only vaguely to its sources, and presents no scientific evidence for its findings.
"There's a whole lot of what we would now think of as psychobabble in Murray's article," Dr. Michael Stone, a psychiatrist at Columbia University School of Medicine, said after reviewing the profile. One example, Dr. Stone said, is "the suggestion that as a child Hitler witnessed his mother and father having sex, which in those days was given great weight as a source of psychological turmoil." Such an effect has since been discredited.
Dr. Murray did not have the benefit of genetic studies, or of more carefully distinguished categories of mental illness established later.
"Almost anyone who appeared crazy was called schizophrenic back then," Dr. Stone said, "and people didn't make distinctions between schizophrenia, for example, and manic depression."
In a more recent psychological profile, the neurologist and psychiatrist Dr. Fritz Redlich argued in his 1998 book, "Hitler: Diagnosis of a Destructive Prophet," that while troubled and with paranoid tendencies, Hitler had probably not been mentally ill. Even during the war, many historians were very skeptical of efforts to explain, with what they described as armchair psychoanalysis, acts of transcendent cruelty.
Dr. Murray himself was a controversial figure. Having returned to Harvard after the war, he was involved in psychological experiments in 1959-62 in which a stress test similar to one the O.S.S. had used to assess recruits was administered to student volunteers. Among them was the young Theodore J. Kaczynski, a precocious student at Harvard who later became known as the Unabomber. Lawyers for Mr. Kaczynski, who pleaded guilty in 1998 to letter bomb attacks that killed 3 people and wounded 28 others, traced some of his emotional instability and fear of mind control to those tests.
Still, historians say, the spirit of Hitler is alive, and infused with morbid detail, in Dr. Murray's pages. The growing boy, a frustrated romantic who loved painting castles and temples, and who was enthralled with architecture, also developed "a profound admiration, envy and emulation of his father's masculine power and a contempt for his mother's feminine submissiveness and weakness," Dr. Murray wrote.
"Thus," the profile says, "both parents were ambivalent to him: his father was hated and respected; his mother was loved and depreciated. Hitler's conspicuous actions have all been in imitation of his father, not his mother."
The assessment also includes advice for how the Allies should handle Hitler if he was captured (secretly film him, replete with sound track, in his cell so that the world would witness his rantings) and what name to give him when talking to his defeated countrymen (False Prophet or False Messiah at first; Corporal Satan or World Criminal No. 1 later). As for how Hitler's life would play out in the absence of capture, Dr. Murray predicted suicide.
"There is a powerful compulsion in him to sacrifice himself and all of Germany to the revengeful annihilation of Western culture, to die, dragging all of Europe with him into the abyss," Dr. Murray wrote.
Barring a deadly coup or insanity, Dr. Murray speculated, Hitler would arrange to have himself killed by a German or a Jew, to complete the myth of the hero betrayed. Or he would retreat to his bunker and, in dramatic fashion, shoot himself.
In the spring of 1945, as far as historians can determine, that is exactly what he did.
Hitler never drew people. He's draw streets and scenes but no people.
And he may have been 12.5 % Jewish.
and he was a homo.
Bump for later. Thanks for your post, neverdem.
As for how Hitler's life would play out in the absence of capture, Dr. Murray predicted suicide. Good call.
"How fortunate for govenments that people do not think". Adolph Hitler
(Quoted in an article by Richard Grenier, "The Gandhi Nobody Knows," Commentary, March 1983 [online at http://eserver.org/history/ghandi-nobody-knows.txt ])
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
He was a genius.
<< and he was a homo. >>
In the end, that's all he was: The ultimate manifestation of evil - the definitive bitchy queer.
[All of history's most evil tyrants were/are, demonstrably, sexual deviants]
I periodically remind my teenage vegetarian niece that Hitler, too, was a vegetarian. This does not amuse her mother (my liberal sister-in-law).
Actually, he did draw people. He just wasn't any good at it.
"and he was a homo."
Please. The man had enough problems. THAT was NOT one of them. Some evidence for your perusal:
1. He justified the murders of Roehm and his homosexual S.A. leadership by telling the Reichstag: "For their perversity alone they should have been shot!"
2. He was so distressed when his half-niece, Geli Raubal killed herself (he was in love with her) that he was put on a 'suicide watch' by fellow NAZIs who refused to leave him alone for a couple of days afterwards (circa 1930).
3. Eva Braun's letters survive and put the lie to the above statement - she describes their love making in at least one of them - he kept his socks on, if you care to know.
4. Finally (the clincher): he fathered a son (whom he never saw) with a French woman during WW I. When he conquered France, he had her immediately locked up in a mental asylum.
Her son found out his father's identity on his mother's death bed, and, needless to say, it ruined his life. He did have children however, so Hitler actually left descendants, who are French, and probably do not volunteer this family information very readily (to say the least).
However, he WAS a psychopath;
He was a Methamphetamine addict since about 1935, courtesy the quack Dr. Morrell, who was retained by Hitler as his doctor because Morrell was a Syphillis specialist;
He probably had Syphillis since some time in his youth, and his later conduct is consistent with the later stages of the disease, as well as Methamphetamine mania.
Any OTHER history lessons you want me to present to you?
There's no point in trying to slander a monster. His crimes speak for themselves and are infinitely worse than any of the character flaws he is often accused of.
Third, some understanding of Hitler had to include his love of Wagner, Hegel and other aspects of Germanic culture. While Hitler was not a truly speaking a German, he was Germanic enough to crave an identity as such including Wagner's antisemitism and so forth. As I understand it, Wagner was a cross dresser and Hitler's sexual predilections suggested dysfunction but his biographers have all been unclear to what extant.
There is such a thing as evil. Hitler surely was one of the great communicators of the 30s who understood the fears, wishes and needs of the Germans. He was clever to the extreme and must have been a great retail as well as a wholesale politician. He took all his abilities, all of his intelligence and directed it towards evil; hence, he was an evil man.
Finally, I wish people who write of Hitler's psychology would review Elias Canett's Crowds and Power. This book has a lengthy review of wanting to be a survivor and enjoying being a survivor of the dead as a prime motive factor in many mass murderers of history--that is Genghis Khan, Saddam, Caesar and so forth. This is why these people were dangerous and why now (with the A bomb) we dare not permit another to rise. A good reason for disposing of Saddam.
I didn't read the link in comment# 1, yet. Did you already?
Read "The Pink Swastika" and you will learn that much of the popular myths about homosexuality and the Third Reich are dead wrong.
"..surely was one of the great communicators ... who understood the fears, wishes and needs ... He was clever to the extreme and must have been a great retail as well as a wholesale politician. He took all his abilities, all of his intelligence and directed it towards evil; hence, he was an evil man."
Your description, to me, fits a recent President...or was it First Lady?
And that's because accurate drawings of people, especially the human face is quite difficult. That's part of the reason why modern art is so popular. The other part of the reason behind modern arts popularity is because drawing anything accurately requires skill.
While not a true homosexual, nothing you wrote would rule out Hitler being bisexual or having gone through a period of exclusive homosexuality during his early adult years in Vienna.
Hitler raved on about homosexuals the same way as you. :)
Wow, I had never read anything about him having a child. Poor kid.
Beating the nurture over nature drum to death. Some people are just plain evil.
I spent some time reading through the cited OSS report on Hitler's personality. A few things bear mentioning.
First, the report does not claim that Hitler was an overt homosexual, but rather that he had repressed homosexual tendencies. It also claimed he had heterosexual incliniations, but was impotent. The main finding about his sexuality was that he was a masochist.
Second, the report diagnoses Hitler with practically every mental illness under the sun, including paranoid schizophrenia. Some of the diagnoses seem very far-fetched and ridiculous. Some of the diagnoses rely on discredited psychoanalytic thinking; for example, the report explains that Hitler must have witnessed his parents having sex as a child, which inspired Oedipal rage and jealousy against the father, etc. A significant amount of Hitler's behavior is explained by silly mechanisms like Oedipal rage, desire to sleep with the mother, and so on.
Third, the report did not accurately predict Hitler's demise. The report claimed Hitler would die by having a Jew shoot him, thereby preserving his status as an anti-Jewish hero; or, that he would die by leading soldiers directly into a glorious battle; or, that he would die by committing suicide in some incredibly dramatic way like blowing up his palace with him in it. Instead, he just shot himself. Although the report accurately predicted that Hitler would commit suicide, that prediction was easy since Hitler constantly repeated that if Germany lost the war he'd commit suicide.
The report seems to suffer from a few problems. First, the Freudian/psychosexual stuff lacks credibility. Second, the predictions of Hitler's future behavior were inaccurate. Third, the report disagrees with various other psychoanalyses of Hitler, except in regard to Hitler's rage over childhood abuse and humiliation. Fourth, the report subscribes to a discredited view of schizophrenia as resulting from subconscious conflicts. It's now known that schizophrenia is the result of a degenerative brain disease, and I doubt very much that Hitler had it, since he displayed none of the typical symptoms. But the report repeatedly diagnoses Hitler as having paranoid schizophrenia, or being "on the verge of it" because of subconscious conflicts.
Doubtless Hitler was a deeply disturbed man with all kinds of mental problems. But the accuracy of the specific psychoanalyses in this report remain to be demonstrated. Some parts seemed highly plausible, and other parts seemed doubtful.
"The only thing I can figure is that these women like anal sex, or don't have what it takes to endure the built-in stress of a male-female relationship (the gubmint says our brains are different, DOH!)."
Well, as long as this is a psychobabble thread...
Women, if they are at all intelligent, realize that on some level all the men they meet would like to have sex with them (matters of self-restraint and morality aside). Indeed, it seems most women these days have had a lot of men try very hard to get them in the sack, employing various kinds and degrees of leverage, including dishonesty and even physical force.
Hanging with homos, first, they can relax because the homo doesn't want to nail them; and second, I really think there's an element of schadenfreude in that the homo wants to do to men approximately what those men want to do to women.
The attitude seems to be, "See how you like a man with an erection chasing you around trying to stick it in you for a change." Revenge by proxy.
Not true of all women, of course, but I have observed it in some.
Is your source for this info in a single volume I can pick up at Barnes and Noble?
Homosexuals were also singled out by Hitler's party for extermination. Perhaps he wanted to destroy everything resembling himself. Homosexuality itself is not destructive (the AIDS thing is a myth). It would be ethical to leave them to their desires.
I just rented and watched something on Hitler, called, IIRC, "The Rise of Evil."
I'm sure historians could find things to quibble with, but I thought it was pretty good.
They made Geli look about 16 instead of 21 (or maybe I'm just getting old) and they alleged that he liked golden showers, but they didn't present him as having SSAD.
One thing I thought was good was that they went into detail on how Hitler got Bismarck to apppoint him Chancellor.
"Homosexuality itself is not destructive"
Sorry to have to contradict you, but it is extremely destructive, both of the individuals afflicted and of every society that has ever condoned it.
One thing I thought was good was that they went into detail on how Hitler got Bismarck to apppoint him Chancellor.
President Hindenburg appointed him Chancellor.
It should be noted that after conquering the Chinese (he *did* give them a chance to surrender, and he did tell them what would happen if they didn't; they laughed at him), Ghengis Khan actually tried to settle down and have a trading empire. He improved existing trade links to Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and created new ones.
That all came to an end when some idiot Persian decided that Ghengis was a stupid barbarian who could be cowed and sent the head of the Mongol ambassador to the Persian Empire back to Ghengis in a sack. Unfortunately, the ambassador was a good friend of Ghengis, and we all know what happened next.
Ghengis was ruthless with his enemies, but faithful to his friends and allies. He was not evil, and he was very much a product of his times.
Well, duh on me.
I do know that, but at my time of life I find myself misspeaking with increasing frequency. The other day I meant to say, "Samui desu ne," meaning "It's cold, isn't it," but what came out of my mouth was, "Yasui desu ne." Meaning, in context, "My, the weather certainly is inexpensive today, isn't it?"
Recently I've even been caught making grammatical errors in my writing, which is frightening, because that never happened to me before.
SSAD is same-sex attraction disorder, which is a much more appropriate and accurate term to describe the problem.
The word "homosexuality" can imply that it is an immutable condition, which it is not, or that it is voluntary, which, in my view, it is not.
It is as involuntary as any symptom associated with a mental disorder, and it is curable.
Most sodomites are bisexuals.
I guess you're saying that I "doth protest too loudly"? LOL
I can understand that some people might assume that. It's also a valid assumption in some cases. Not in my case, solid monogamous hetero, with occasional flings (female, DOH!), between long term girlfriends.
I do protest the homo agenda whenever I can. I see them as a cancer invading our society. As just one example, they've almost destroyed the Catholic church in the US. My Catholic sister-in-law is so fed up with the Catholic priests fiasco, she's semi-jokingly speaks of converting to Judaism.
Maybe it's that I've been overexposed to them, not just during my life in the liberal cities on the east coast, but in overseas DOD schools as a kid.
Maybe I've had to work with, and for, too many of them, and know what kind of twisted depraved beings they are.
Maybe it's that at one point, my primary contact at every one of my clients was a homo (I think that's when I finally lost it}.
Maybe it's that one of my clients was an organization in Boston that was at the heart of the homosexual marriage drive, and my professional ethics prevented me from doing anything about it.
I have my faults, and I'm well aware of them, but megalomania and homosexuality are not among them.
LOL, FR is my psychobabble couch. I'm in the Heart of Darkness, Boston. Where else can I turn? I'd rather converse with FR "peeples" than anyone up here.
I spent the entire Red Sox World Series on FR live threads, rather than going out and having to deal with liberals.
a man with an erection chasing you around
That reminds me of a line from a Dirty Harry movie... nekid man chasing a woman through an alley...
BTW would dsc be a Distinguished Service Cross?
Lost in Translation.
WRONG on point one.
WRONG on point two.
and WRONG! on point three.
Buh Bye DU!
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
"BTW would dsc be a Distinguished Service Cross?"
No, it would be my initials. If I had a Distinguished Service Cross, I would have chosen a different handle.
Come to think of it, if I'd stopped to think it might lead to that confusion, I would have chosen a different handle.
"Most sodomites are bisexuals."
All people are intrinsically heterosexual. It takes a bad case of SSAD to turn a man completely away from women.
No sweatsky. No offense intended, I'm sure, and none taken.
Its been no secret that the SA was run a bunch of homosexual thugs (Ernst Roehm & Co.) In the end they proved too dangerous and expendable.
"Any OTHER history lessons you want me to present to you?
While not a true homosexual, nothing you wrote would rule out Hitler being bisexual or having gone through a period of exclusive homosexuality during his early adult years in Vienna."
Nothing you have written would rule out Hitler doing it with dogs during his years in Vienna, either - except the complete lack of any evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.