Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert Finds Dandruff in Air Pollutants
Associated Press ^ | 3/31/05 | RANDOLPH E. SCHMID

Posted on 03/31/2005 1:35:43 PM PST by anymouse

A researcher has discovered unexpectedly large amounts of dandruff and other flaking skin, fur, pollen and similar materials in air pollutants known as aerosols.

Aerosols, tiny particles in the air, are widely studied because they are an important factor in regulating climate, variously absorbing heat to warm the air and reflecting sunlight to cool it. They are also important in forming rain and snow.

But the amount of cellular material — bacteria, plant fragments, spores, fungi and so forth — had been thought to be only a small proportion compared with mineral dusts, clay and sea salt.

Now, Ruprecht Jaenicke of the Institute for Atmospheric Physics at Mainz University in Germany has studied air samples and discovered that biological materials can range up to 25 percent of aerosols in some areas, and as high as 40 percent in others.

His findings are reported in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

The source of many aerosols has been unexplained and this could provide the answer, Jaenicke said.

Jaenicke reported that the percentage of biological materials in aerosol pollution topped 40 percent in Mainz in September and 30 percent in October. And a study at Lake Baikal, Russia, showed more than 30 percent in September.

He said he did similar studies of the air over ocean environments, on mountains and in ice cores. There was no strong annual cycle, he said, although pollen was more abundant in spring while decaying cellular matter was more common in fall and winter.

He estimated that the amount of biological particles in the air, worldwide, annually is 1,000 teragrams. A teragram is somewhat more than a million tons.

By comparison, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, established by the World Meteorological Organization and the U.N. Environmental Program, estimated biological particles at 56 teragrams, compared with 3,300 teragrams of sea salt and 2,000 teragrams of mineral dust.

The new finding means researchers should take biological materials seriously in climate modeling, in cloud physics and in hygienic questions such as allergies, Jaenicke said.

"Don't regard that as a minor contribution," he said.

The implications for the global climate are unclear, said Murray V. Johnston, a chemistry professor at the University of Delaware.

"The number concentrations of (biological particles) reported here are much higher than previously thought and merit follow-up research," said Johnston, who did not participate in Jaenicke's research.

James J. Schwab, an atmospheric chemistry research professor at the State University of New York at Albany, isn't so sure Jaenicke's figures are correct.

"He may very well be right. His paper does not convince me that I should believe his estimate, however. He needs to present a more detailed and convincing argument first," said Schwab.

If Jaenicke's estimate is right, Schwab said, "It will have small but important effects on global climate change. It will have a bigger effect on air pollution and air quality for regions of the country and the globe that are out of compliance with air quality standards."

The research was funded by the German Science Foundation.

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Russia; Technical; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: aerosols; bacteria; clay; climate; dandruff; dusts; enviroment; evironazis; fungi; fur; germany; globalwarming; globalwhining; junkscience; plantfragments; pollen; pollution; seasalt; skin; spores; un; unitednations; wmo
More junk science.

Go back to taking your shower, and this time use more dandruff shampoo! LOL :)

1 posted on 03/31/2005 1:35:49 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anymouse
Whether it's Junk Science or not, we call all agree that the probable carriers of much of the world's dandruff, head lice and other maladies are the maggot-infested, non-bathing, tree-huggers of the world.

Ironic ain't it?

2 posted on 03/31/2005 1:41:33 PM PST by keithtoo (Kennedy - he's of Irish extraction, but under the influence of Scotch most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

The average human body sloghs off enough dead skin each week to fill a quart jar. The funny thing is that it clings back to the body when you shower. It needs to be dry to come off. Most of it is rubbed off in your clothing and bed. It feeds the flora and fauna which occupy your body. I've never figger'd the antibiotic soap crowd. All that gives you is fungal infections and ringworm. Host diversity is my motto.

3 posted on 03/31/2005 2:11:48 PM PST by blackdog (Lord of Woop Woop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
There are some mites that live in your eyebrows and eyelashes that go for a walk while you sleep and feast on all the bacteria, fungal spores, and dead skin around your eyes. They keep 99% of nasty critters from entering your system thru the eyes.

Stupid women go and pluck their eyebrows away and gunk up their eyelashes with cosmetics. Dumasses..............

4 posted on 03/31/2005 2:36:58 PM PST by blackdog (Lord of Woop Woop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

On what basis do you dismiss this as "junk science?" Do you have studies showing contradictory evidence, or are you evincing a knee-jerk reaction to something you find personally abhorent but lack the ability to refute?

5 posted on 04/11/2005 11:44:46 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
The thought of breathing in other people's dandruff flakes makes me throw up a little in my mouth.

The only consolation is that when I burp afterwards, little microscopic bits of my puke float off and into the nose and mouth of others, evening the score in some karmic sense.

6 posted on 04/11/2005 11:48:06 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
I'm pointing out that the enviro-nazi "scientists" did not realize until recently that a large part of what they characterized as air pollution was naturally produced organic matter. And instead of lowering their air pollution numbers to factor out the organic matter, they now want to deem such naturally occurring organic aerosols as air pollution.

A classic case of justifying a predetermined finding, but fudging the experimental data to fit their political agenda. This is not science, this is fascist politics polluting science. If anyone should know better it should be German "Scientists."
7 posted on 04/11/2005 11:56:17 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

In this article, the term "pollution" indicates any foreign particulate matter. This could be anything from organics to volcanic ash to automobile exhaust.

8 posted on 04/11/2005 6:05:15 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson