Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Public execution
The Spectator ^ | Mar.31, 2005 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 03/31/2005 11:47:24 PM PST by Zivasmate

Public execution Mark Steyn

New Hampshire

Do you remember a fellow called Robert Wendland? No reason why you should. I wrote about him in this space in 1998, and had intended to return to the subject but something else always intervened — usually Bill Clinton’s penis, which loomed large, at least metaphorically, over the entire era. Mr Wendland lived in Stockton, California. He was injured in an automobile accident in 1993 and went into a coma. Under state law, he could have been starved to death at any time had his wife requested the removal of his feeding tube. But Rose Wendland was busy with this and that, as one is, and assumed there was no particular urgency.

Then one day, a year later, Robert woke up. He wasn’t exactly his old self, but he could catch and throw a ball and wheel his chair up and down the hospital corridors, and both activities gave him pleasure. Nevertheless Mrs Wendland decided that she now wished to exercise her right to have him dehydrated to death. Her justification was that, while the actual living Robert — the Robert of the mid-1990s — might enjoy a simple life of ball-catching and chair-rolling, the old Robert — the pre-1993 Robert — would have considered it a crashing bore and would have wanted no part of it.

She nearly got her way. But someone at the hospital tipped off Mr Wendland’s mother and set off a protracted legal struggle in which — despite all the obstacles the California system could throw in her path — the elderly Florence Wendland was eventually successful in preventing her son being put down. He has since died of pneumonia, which is sad: the disabled often fall victim to some opportunist illness they’d have shrugged off in earlier times, as Christopher Reeve did. But that’s still a better fate than to be starved to death by order of the state.

Six and a half years later, the Terri Schiavo case is almost identical to Robert Wendland’s — parents who wish to care for a disabled daughter, a spouse who wants her dead, a legal system determined to see her off. The only difference is that this time the system is likely to win — it may already have done so by the time you read this — and that Mrs Schiavo’s death is being played out round the clock coast to coast, with full supporting cast. It is easy to mock the attendant ‘circus’, the cheapest laugh of the self-identified sophisticate. A 12-year-old boy has been arrested for attempting to offer Mrs Schiavo a glass of water. Ha-ha.

On the other hand, if one accepts the official version that the court is merely bringing to an end (after 15 years) the artificial prolongation of Mrs Schiavo’s life, since when has a glass of water been deemed medical treatment? In the public areas of Morton Plant Hospital in Clearwater, the waiting journalists grab a Coke or a coffee or even a glass of water every half hour or so without anyone considering it ‘medical treatment’. That it is, uniquely, a crime to serve Mrs Schiavo a beverage underlines the court’s intent — not to cease the artificial prolongation of life but actively to cause her death.

When poor Terri Schiavo broke on to the front pages, several commentators said the case was another Elian Gonzalez — the Cuban boy whose mother died trying to bring him to freedom in America. That’s to say, it was one of those stories where all sorts of turbulent questions of law, morality and politics collide. Two weeks on, if it’s Clintonian analogies we’re after, it seems to me the public regard it as something closer to the whole Paula/Monica/Juanita production line culminating in impeachment: if you recall, a large number of people were outraged by the President, a smaller number of people were determined to defend him to the end, and a huge number of people just didn’t want to hear about it; and the more Republicans went on about the DNA analysis of the dress stain and Mr Clinton lying about whether his enumerated parts had been in contact with her enumerated parts and the DNA analysis of the dress stain, the more they stuck their hands over their ears and said, ‘La-la-la, can’t hear you.’

That seems to be what’s happening here. Whether or not there’s anything in the various dubious polls claiming to show people opposed to Congressional efforts to reinsert Mrs Schiavo’s feeding tube, it seems clear that many of us would rather she’d been like Robert Wendland — a faraway local story of which they know little. A lot of Americans have paced hospital corridors while gran’ma’s medical taxi-meter goes ticking upward and, if my mailbag’s anything to go by, they’d rather this sort of stuff stayed in the shadows. Nobody likes to see how the sausage is made, or in this case the vegetable, if that indeed is what Terri Schiavo is. Many people seem to be unusually anxious to pretend that this judicial murder is merely a very belated equivalent of a discreet doctor putting a hopeless case out of her misery, or to take refuge in the idea that some magisterial disinterested ‘due process’ is being played out — or as a reader wrote to me the other day: ‘Why are you fundamentalists so clueless? It’s the law, dickbrain. Michael Schiavo isn’t acting for himself; he’s been legally recognised as the person qualified to act for Terri in expressing her wishes based on her own oral declarations.’

Which sounds fine and dandy, until you uncover your ears and a lot of the genteel euphemisms and legalisms and medicalisms — ‘right to die’, ‘guardian ad litem’, ‘PVS’ — start to sound downright Orwellian. PVS means ‘persistent vegetative state’, and because it’s a grand official-sounding term it’s been accepted mostly without question by the mainstream media, even though the probate judge declared Mrs Schiavo in a persistent vegetative state without troubling to visit her and without requiring any of the routine tests, such as an MRI scan. Indeed, her husband hasn’t permitted her to be tested for anything since 1993. Think about that: this woman is being put to death without any serious medical evaluation more recent than 12 years ago.

La-la-la, we don’t want to hear how the vegetable’s made....

Fortunately, if you want to execute someone who hasn’t committed a crime, you don’t need to worry with any of this ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ stuff. If an al-Qa’eda guy got shot up resisting capture in Afghanistan and required a feeding tube and the guards at Guantanamo yanked it out, you’d never hear the end of it from the American Civil Liberties Union and Amnesty International and all the rest. Even given the litigious nature of American society, it still strikes me as remarkable that someone can be literally sued to death, and at the hands of a probate judge. Unlike other condemned prisoners, there’s no hope of a last-minute reprieve from the governor. That’s to say, he did reprieve her, and so did the legislature, and the US Congress and President — and the Florida courts have declared them all irrelevant. So, unlike Death Row, there’s no call from the governor, and no quick painless lethal injection or electrocution or swift clean broken neck from the hangman’s noose, and certainly no last meal. On Tuesday, getting a little impatient with the longest slow-motion public execution in American history, CBS News accidentally posted Mrs Schiavo’s obit on their website complete with vivid details that have yet to occur — the parents at her bedside in the final moments, etc. In this, they seem to be in tune with their viewers: sad business, personal tragedy, no easy answers, prayers are with her family, yada yada, is it over yet?

Just to underline the Clinton comparison, the Sunday Times’s Andrew Sullivan has dusted off his impeachment act and damned those of us opposed to Mrs Schiavo’s judicial murder as dogmatic extremist fundamentalist religious-right theocrats. If he’d stop his shrill bleating for a couple of minutes, he might notice that the ‘theocrats’ who want Terri Schiavo to live include Jesse Jackson, Ralph Nader and Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, who’s not just a Democrat but a gay one. True, the TV networks — as they often do with what they see as socially conservative issues — prefer to train their cameras on some of Mrs Schiavo’s more obviously loopy defenders. But, for all that, it seems far weirder to me to be quite so enthusiastic about ending her life. I’ve received innumerable emails along the lines of, ‘If Terri Schiavo didn’t want this to happen to her, all she had to do under Florida law was make a “living will”’ — one of those documents that says in the event of a severe disability I do/do not want to be kept alive (delete as applicable). Well, OK, I haven’t received ‘innumerable’ emails, but I’ve received enough that I now send back a form response politely inquiring whether the correspondent has himself made a living will. I’ve yet to receive any answers. But I can’t see why, in a free society, healthy persons in their twenties should be expected to file legal documents in order to pre-empt a court order mandating their death a decade or two hence.

Even if you believe in living wills, it’s hard to argue that Michael Schiavo’s wildly inconsistent statements of his wife’s casual remarks about living on a tube should have the force of one. I’d be irked to find I was being deported to Pyongyang on the grounds that, while watching a TV documentary late one night in 1987, I’d been heard to say, ‘Wow, you know it’d be kinda cool to go to North Korea, don’t you think?’ But the Florida legal system’s position remains — as a reader, Adrienne Follmer, paraphrased it to me the other day — ‘We don’t know for sure if this woman wanted to live so let’s starve her to death.’

La-la-la, still can’t hear you....

One consequence of abortion is that, in designating new life as a matter of ‘choice’, it created a culture where it’s now routine to make judgments about which lives are worth it and which aren’t. Down’s Syndrome? Abort. Cleft palate? Abort. Chinese girl? Abort. It’s foolish to think you can raise entire populations — not to mention generations of doctors — to make self-interested judgments about who lives and who doesn’t and expect them to remain confined to three trimesters. The ‘right to choose’ is now being extended beyond the womb: the step from convenience euthanasia to compulsory euthanasia is a short one. Until a year or two back, I spent a lot of my summer Saturdays manning the historical society booth at the flea markets on the town common, and I passed many a pleasant quarter-hour or so chit-chatting with elderly ladies leading some now middle-aged simpleton child around. Both parties seemed to enjoy the occasion. The child is no doubt a ‘burden’: he was born because he just was; there was no ‘choice’ about it in those days. Having done away with those kinds of ‘burdens’ at birth, we’re less inclined to tolerate them when they strike in adulthood, as they did in Terri Schiavo’s case.

In that sense, the Schiavo debate provides a glimpse of the Western world the day after tomorrow — a world of nonagenarian baby boomers who’ve conquered most of the common-or-garden diseases and instead get stricken by freaky protracted colossally expensive chronic illnesses; a world of more and more dependants, with fewer and fewer people to depend on. In Europe, where demographic reality means that in a generation or so all the dependants will be elderly European Christians and most of the fellows they’re dependent on will be young North African or Arab Muslims, the social consensus for government health care is unlikely to survive. Terri Schiavo failed to demonstrate conclusively why she should be permitted by the state to continue living. As Western nations evolve rapidly into the oldest societies in human history, many more of us will be found similarly wanting.

Michael Schiavo’s lawyer, George Felos, is a leading light of the so-called ‘right-to-die’ movement, and his book, Litigation as Spiritual Practice, makes interesting reading. On page 240 Mr Felos writes, ‘The Jewish people, long ago in their collective consciousness, agreed to play the role of the lamb whose slaughter was necessary to shock humanity into a new moral consciousness. Their sacrifice saved humanity at the brink of extinction and propelled us into a new age.... If our minds can conceive of an uplifting Holocaust, can it be so difficult to look another way at the slights and injuries and abuses we perceive were inflicted upon us?’

Mr Felos feels it is now Terri Schiavo’s turn to ‘agree’ to play the role of the lamb whose slaughter is necessary to shock humanity into a new moral consciousness. As I read Felos’s words, I heard a radio bulletin announce that the Pope may now require a feeding tube. Fortunately for him, his life is ultimately in the hands of God and not a Florida probate judge.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: felos; lalalawecanthearyou; terrischiavo; thepope; vegetable; water
Vintage Mark Steyn. Perhaps some of the humor is missing, but a sharp and incisive column.He contemplates the scary consequences of the Schiavo state murder.
1 posted on 03/31/2005 11:47:24 PM PST by Zivasmate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate
La-la-la, we don’t want to hear how the vegetable’s made....

Paging the WPPFF... Paging the WPPFF... your motto is ready.

2 posted on 04/01/2005 12:00:42 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (one nation. playing God. divisible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate

Absolutely...right on!

http://www.karaklein.com/home.php

Listen to Kara Klein sing a special song for Terri here.


3 posted on 04/01/2005 12:05:01 AM PST by Shery (S. H. in APOland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate

Yep, another good one by Steyn. In my conversations about Terri, I found most people were ignorant about the all situation. And, they did not want to hear it either. La-la-la, I can't hear you.


4 posted on 04/01/2005 12:10:13 AM PST by raisincane (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfield - A Great US Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate

I think some of the humor is missing because it's scary as hell what these judges and courts can do to us.

We must not allow Congress to be silent about this.


5 posted on 04/01/2005 12:23:23 AM PST by The Final Harvest (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate
This article is well done.

One thing that I've yet to see anyone point out is the paradoxical position that the "right to die" side took when they said:

A) It's cruel to leave her in this state, she doesn't want to live like that - she's unhappy.

B) She's so mentally incompetent that she has no idea that she's been denied food and water for almost two weeks - can't feel a thing.
6 posted on 04/01/2005 12:31:40 AM PST by Jaysun (I must warn you, I am a black belt in bullshitsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate

When did Barney Frank hop on board? He was vehemently opposed to the Congressional action.


7 posted on 04/01/2005 12:34:32 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate
Six and a half years later, the Terri Schiavo case is almost identical to Robert Wendland’s — parents who wish to care for a disabled daughter, a spouse who wants her dead...

Correction - a 'spouse' who has abandoned his wife in the name of serial adultery while still claiming 'spousal' rights despite having children with a shackup girlfriend. Michael Schiavo can do whatever he wants with his life, but don't tell me he's Terri's husband.

8 posted on 04/01/2005 12:38:45 AM PST by RockinRye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I think that's a mistake.


9 posted on 04/01/2005 12:40:20 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (one nation. playing God. divisible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RockinRye
don't tell me he's Terri's husband

OK, lets call him the happy widower* then. :-(

*(AKA the unfaithful, wife beating, murderer who pulled the perfect crime - thanks to a judicial culture of death, and a lamely managed Republican party.
10 posted on 04/01/2005 1:01:29 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RockinRye

I just can not assume that Robert Wendland’s wife was an adulterer for so many years as was Michael Schiavo. I, too, say that Michael Schiavo was no more the husband of Terri Schiavo as was Donald Duck! What a farce, and what a misconception!


11 posted on 04/01/2005 1:03:27 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
MISTAKE??? HOW IN THE TERRI SITUATION CAN THERE POSSIBLY BE A "MISTAKE"?!! IT'S GOTTA BE A FREAKIN' LIE!!!! </mimicking wicked people pulling feeding facilities>
12 posted on 04/01/2005 1:06:37 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raisincane
BREAKING: GOTTA SEE THIS:

Judgenfuhrer George Greer's biography

Scientology and Terri Schindler's Murder

Lawyer donations to the Murdering Judge

MICHAEL SCHIAVO's private Insurance company
JERGER & CENTONZE INSURNACE AGENCY, INC.
Notice how 'insurance' is conveniently misspelled and his squeeze's name is misspelled, too

MICHAEL SCHIAVO'S lies and contradictory testimony in easy to read format

The Rule of Terri's Case Strikes Again. -2004- Judge Greer's crimes to Murder Terri

Law conveniently changed by Hospice where Terri was Judicially murdered

13 posted on 04/01/2005 3:05:18 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raisincane
You're right, Raisincane. People do not want to hear all the unpleasant details. Just die and get out of the news so we can get back to the Michael Jackson trial. Terri Schiavo was a test for this country, and we failed it.
14 posted on 04/01/2005 3:11:03 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes

Ther bit about saying going to North Korea would be cool is priceless.


15 posted on 04/01/2005 4:17:11 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate
"Make Way You Old Ones!" It was a Nazi slogan. After all they did place an emphasis on youthful vitality. Then again a modern futuristic version of is Logan's Run. Terminate any one under 40. You don't need to take care of doddering fools asleep in their own bodily waste. Put them out of the misery. The most productive people are the ones who still don't need to have the plug pulled for them. When the day comes when they can no longer decide, they can count on a peaceful starvation. Courtesy of watching Big Brother.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
16 posted on 04/01/2005 5:06:17 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.


17 posted on 04/01/2005 5:13:17 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

bookmark


18 posted on 04/01/2005 5:42:44 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zivasmate

BTTT.


19 posted on 04/01/2005 8:35:44 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (one nation. playing God. divisible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson