No , muslims would have loped off some heads and raped the women and boys.
If you think that the Hindus didn't do that too, to the Muslims, then you just don't know Indian history. Shows you don't know human nature either. Just shows your hatred of Muslims. Both Hindus and Muslims USUALLY reserved their fanaticism for each other. There were simply too few Christians to matter and the Christians USUALLY kept a very low profile.
This sounds like a isolated incident in a country of a few hundred million that was was more of a fight or scuffle then anything else.
Agreed. These "scuffles" sometimes DO stay at that level. Let's hope they do here.
India isn't a "few hundred million"; it has ONE BILLION people.
So one incident among a billion people keeps the relativity factor on equal terms?
posted on 04/01/2005 7:45:23 AM PST
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
Shows you don't know human nature either. Just shows your hatred of Muslims. Both Hindus and Muslims USUALLY reserved their fanaticism for each other.
Hate has such a strong meaning in todays society. I have a 1864 Websters that describes hate as : extreme dislike. So I do have a extreme dislike for muslims. And I understand that there might be some decent muslims. I wonder why they dont speak up. Could it be because they will do as the cult of the moon god tells them to do just when it is convienant for them?
posted on 04/01/2005 8:55:46 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson