Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Dept. Calls on Israel to “Foreswear” Nuclear Arms
Arutz 7 ^ | Apr 03, '05 | staff

Posted on 04/03/2005 9:48:32 AM PDT by Nachum

In a move that could curtail Israeli power in the Middle East, the US is calling on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) and forego the use and stockpile of nuclear weapons.

Twice in the past two weeks, State Department officials have compared Israel’s status as a nuclear power with that of India and Pakistan, calling on all three nations to give up their nuclear arms.

The statements were made by two mid-level State Department Officials, ahead of the NPT Review Conference, scheduled to open in New York on May 2.

The purpose of the conference is to evaluate implementation of the NPT and determine its future course. The officials’ comments regarding Israel’s weapons capability were made, apparently, in order to put the issue of Israel’s nukes on the conference’s agenda. The comments appeared to deviate from Bush Administration policy, which up to now, refrained from using terminology that confirms Israel’s status as a nuclear nation.

The most recent statement came from Jackie Wolcott Sanders, the president’s representative for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. In an essay titled “How to Strengthen the NPT” Sanders mentions Israel, along with India and Pakistan, within the context of enforcing “universal NPT adherence,” but adds that it’s not likely “in the foreseeable future.”

“The Review Conference should reinforce the goal of universal NPT adherence and reaffirm that India, Israel and Pakistan may join the NPT only as non-nuclear-weapon states. Just as South Africa and Ukraine did in the early 1990s, these states would have to forswear nuclear weapons and accept IAEA safeguards on all nuclear activities to join the treaty. At the same time, we recognize that progress toward universal adherence is not likely in the foreseeable future,” writes Sanders.

She adds, “The United States continues to support the goals of the Middle East resolution adopted at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference, including the achievement of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.”

Another statement, using similar language, was made by Mark Fitzpatrick, acting deputy assistant secretary for nuclear proliferation, on March 17, at a Meeting of the Organization of American States Committee on Hemispheric Security, in Washington, D.C. He also held the status of Israel’s nuclear armaments on a par with those of Pakistan and India:

“The Conference should also reinforce the goal of universal NPT adherence and reaffirm that India, Israel and Pakistan may join the NPT only as non-nuclear-weapon states. Just as South Africa and Ukraine did in the early 1990s, these states should forswear nuclear weapons and accept IAEA safeguards on all nuclear activities.”

Fitzpatrick’s comments regarding Israel were made just after proclaiming, “Iran and North Korea must not be permitted to violate the NPT without consequences.”

The statements of the two officials contrast with President Bush’s own reference to the NPT in a speech he made on March 7 when he called for enforcing the treaty’s provisions on NPT members, which conveniently include both Iran and North Korea. Bush did not refer to his policy regarding non-member states, which include Israel, Pakistan, and India.

The U.S. State Department has often taken pro-Arab positions on the Arab-Israeli dispute over the years, and has been wary of projecting Israeli power in the Middle East.

Sometimes the department’s positions ostensibly contradict those of the president. For example, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice recently declared in two separate newspaper interviews that President Bush did not make any guarantees to Israel regarding Israel’s right to retain certain settlement blocs as part of a permanent status agreement with the Palestinians. The president purported to make such promises to Israel in a letter he wrote to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon last spring, but the interpretation of Bush’s statements have been the subject of much controversy, some of it spurred on by State Department officials.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arms; calls; dept; foreswear; israel; markfitzpatrick; nuclear; on; state; to
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2005 9:48:33 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Fat chance, suckers.


2 posted on 04/03/2005 9:50:15 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If I were Israel, I'd answer with Charlton Heston's line: "You can have my nukes when you take them from my cold, dead fingers". Let's face it, if Israel didn't have the nuclear edge, they'd be cold and dead by now anyway.


3 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:06 AM PDT by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum



What are we doing?!!! Democracies do not attack their neighbors and Israel is a Democracy!


4 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:17 AM PDT by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Partisan Politics and Intelligence covered here

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

5 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:51 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Israel get rid of the nukes, Iran getting rid of theirs because Israel is? There must be some Dem appeasers left at state.


6 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:51 AM PDT by StuLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Suicide by Israel? I don't think so!


7 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:56 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starve The Beast
I'm appalled. How dare we!
8 posted on 04/03/2005 9:52:07 AM PDT by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StuLongIsland
There must be some Dem appeasers left at state.

Quite a few is my guess. Remember most of the state department went triple postal when the President got tired of waiting on Iraq.
9 posted on 04/03/2005 9:53:12 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Somehow I don't see Israel giving up it's Nukes. What is interesting is that none of these comments have come from Condi. But from others in the embedded bureaucracy of State. Hmmn... Perhaps some house cleaning is in order?


10 posted on 04/03/2005 9:55:28 AM PDT by Danae ( Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
No way should Israel give up their nukes. As long as they have them, their borders are secure....wherever they are.

-Eric

11 posted on 04/03/2005 9:56:26 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Words without meaning...you might as well ask Israel to deny the holocaust.


12 posted on 04/03/2005 9:57:11 AM PDT by GullyFolye (former public school teacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1376522/posts
13 posted on 04/03/2005 9:57:12 AM PDT by ASA Vet (What if tag lines were no longer optional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

My thoughts exactly.

Maybe Sandy Burglar could stuff 'em all in his trousers, and they'd disappear.


14 posted on 04/03/2005 9:58:14 AM PDT by msf92497 (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Why Israel Needs Nukes for Dummies


15 posted on 04/03/2005 9:59:18 AM PDT by MrDem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Nothing like having friendly neighbors...


16 posted on 04/03/2005 10:00:58 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The State Department should be asked foreswear its long entrenched Arabists.


17 posted on 04/03/2005 10:01:50 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.


18 posted on 04/03/2005 10:01:56 AM PDT by SJackson (You simply have to accept the fact that we are all corrupt-Mahmud Abbas to senior UN official, 1996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Adolf H. was chosen in democratic elections.


19 posted on 04/03/2005 10:04:23 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It's only proper that the US should be advocating non-proliferation and a nuclear free Middle East, it's the only consistent standpoint to take.


20 posted on 04/03/2005 10:06:03 AM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Why is Bush turning his back on Israel?? Something's going on, and, Bush IS NOT what he seems. Clintoon would have been "crucified" for suggesting Israel do this , not to mention promoting a Philistine state in the middle of Israel!!


21 posted on 04/03/2005 10:07:27 AM PDT by MrLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canard
It's only proper that the US should be advocating non-proliferation and a nuclear free Middle East, it's the only consistent standpoint to take.

Right..../s

The US and Israel walk hand in hand, and if Israel is to give up her nukes, then it should be professed that the US does the same.

It "ain't" gonna happen.

22 posted on 04/03/2005 10:11:14 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrLee
Sometimes the department’s positions ostensibly contradict those of the president.

Bush hasn't spoken on this issue yet....

23 posted on 04/03/2005 10:13:45 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MrDem
Where is Israel?

Oop's, sorry I had a gnat on my screen.

There she is!

24 posted on 04/03/2005 10:15:52 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Danae

By having surrogates say the things you want to, but can't, that has been the way of leaders forever. This is Bush policy, handed down to Condi and mouthed by those charged to do so.


25 posted on 04/03/2005 10:19:28 AM PDT by jeremiah (The ACLU and lawyers in general, are responsible for 90% of all problems nationwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Remember the good ol' days {last week}, when the only power mad dictators in this country had to wear robes?
Seriously, it is time to put the ruling class in its place.
26 posted on 04/03/2005 10:19:58 AM PDT by labette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Great photo ;)


27 posted on 04/03/2005 10:23:58 AM PDT by IAF ThunderPilot (The basic point of the Israel Defense Forces: -Israel cannot afford to lose a single war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

"Partisan Politics

This is something that I personally have first hand knowledge of. Individuals within our State department and career diplomats who are willing to do anything in their power to discredit the Bush administration. Why are these people still employed? Have we got a deathwish or something? "

Death wish? One would think so. And based on my conversations with 2 State Department career employees who lived next door to my hotel(Lanson Place, 1 Jalan Ampang Hilir), I would guarantee it.


28 posted on 04/03/2005 10:24:59 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now fireproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot; All

For the record: I shamelessly 'stole' the map in #15 from IAF ThunderPilot. :)


29 posted on 04/03/2005 10:30:43 AM PDT by MrDem (Monthly Special: Will write OPUS's for Whiners and Crybabies for no charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All
Sounds great doesn't it?

First Israel give up its nukes.
Then Iran announces that it produced nuclear bombs.
After a while Iran demands from Israel to leave all the "Arab lands", otherwise it will nuke Israel.

Sounds great doesn't it?
30 posted on 04/03/2005 10:30:53 AM PDT by IAF ThunderPilot (The basic point of the Israel Defense Forces: -Israel cannot afford to lose a single war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

Yep,Hitler was elected democratically alright,but he dismantled Germany's democratic institutions before doing the things that made him (in)famous.There is a world of difference from being elected democratically & running a functioning democracy.


31 posted on 04/03/2005 10:32:43 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

I was already planning to sue you, but it won't be needed :)


32 posted on 04/03/2005 10:33:15 AM PDT by IAF ThunderPilot (The basic point of the Israel Defense Forces: -Israel cannot afford to lose a single war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I think they should worry about Pakistan (MUCH MORE than is evident). I don't think there is much reason to fear Israel selling nuke tech to Iran for example. I also don't think there is much chance that an unfriendly goverment will take control of Israel's nukes and use them against, or sell them to others to be used against us.


33 posted on 04/03/2005 10:38:34 AM PDT by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: international american

You still stay there now?


34 posted on 04/03/2005 10:40:46 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot
First Israel give up its nukes

You know it won't happen;). On a different note, I see from your about page that you are not flying F-16's, is that a Kfir? I worked at Base 1 and Base 4 in the late '80's and I thought they refered to Kfir pilots as "ThunderPilots".

35 posted on 04/03/2005 10:44:13 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Peace through Ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

" The US and Israel walk hand in hand, and if Israel is to give up her nukes, then it should be professed that the US does the same.

It "ain't" gonna happen."

Well, the US is a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty, which commits them to doing that. I don't see any way that a solution to the various Middle East problems could not include ensuring that it is a nuclear weapon free zone.


36 posted on 04/03/2005 10:45:57 AM PDT by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

No. I lived there all of 2003, and part of 2004. I bought a condo under construction across from the Petronas Towers. I should be moved in by June. I am currently in Ventura, Ca.


37 posted on 04/03/2005 10:46:01 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now fireproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Canard
I don't see any way that a solution to the various Middle East problems could not include ensuring that it is a nuclear weapon free zone.

Trust but verify?

Second verse same as the first!

38 posted on 04/03/2005 10:48:42 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Disgruntled Clinton holdovers spouting off. Condi needs to go down there and kick their butts.


39 posted on 04/03/2005 10:52:36 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Florida: suppressio veri, suggestio falsi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Uh--We will if you will might be a more appropriate line. And that's the line the Israelis should use to us.


40 posted on 04/03/2005 10:52:49 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

All this demonstrates is that the hypocritical world prefers its Jews dead. After the U.S. gives up the last of its nuclear weapons and its been verified that the mass murdering nations have done the same and there is peace on earth for ten years, only then should anyone have the chutzpah to talk to Israel about giving up its nukes.

Israel's nukes are a factor that promotes peace.


41 posted on 04/03/2005 10:56:10 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: international american

Im sure you need someone to help look after the condo don't you? *wink* *wink*


42 posted on 04/03/2005 11:18:36 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Canard
I don't see any way that a solution to the various Middle East problems could not include ensuring that it is a nuclear weapon free zone.

You are right. The United States needs a peaceful Middle East to ensure a steady oil supply. We should force Israel to give up its nukes or cut off the billions we give them each year.

43 posted on 04/03/2005 11:21:07 AM PDT by crabapple joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

To be honest, if I can drum up enough business in KL
over the next year, I may stay there permanently.You could always stay there when I travel though. I have several good friends and business associates in KL. I have been reading your blog for several months now, and I will contact you when I get there.

Tim


44 posted on 04/03/2005 11:25:31 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now fireproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: crabapple joe

& how much oil does the US get from the M.E??


45 posted on 04/03/2005 11:34:57 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: international american
Well Tim If there is anything I can do to help I definately will. Since my little problem with the cantina I have been looking for things to do. Always need to make money and feed the family.

I hope you like the blog. it is a passion of mine now - if it paid I would be at full time - I just wish I had more time to dedicate to it. I still manage to update daily almost.

Look forward to seeing you when you come. Don't forget good tequila.

Larry

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

46 posted on 04/03/2005 11:35:22 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Shouldn't france and germany be tinted green?


47 posted on 04/03/2005 11:46:02 AM PDT by Yehuda (America: Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: crabapple joe

There is only one solution to a peaceful Middle East, and in fact peace in at least 11 other parts of the world. Peace can happen within 24 hours of the day the Islamic world rejects its culture of hate and death.


48 posted on 04/03/2005 11:52:06 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Canard
"I don't see any way that a solution to the various Middle East problems could not include ensuring that it is a nuclear weapon free zone."

Your willingness to expect the same standards of conduct from US ally as from terrorist nations is disturbing.

Maybe you can find some justification for Al Jazeera for your reasoning, since you find AJ so enthralling.

49 posted on 04/03/2005 12:03:07 PM PDT by Yehuda (America: Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
& how much oil does the US get from the M.E??

Most figures I have seen put the number at about 25% of our oil imports, with Europe being much higher. The fact is that over 60% of the world's proven oil reserves are in the Middle East...makes it kinda an important area don't you think?? I don't drive an SUV, but I still need to get to work every day.

50 posted on 04/03/2005 12:21:35 PM PDT by crabapple joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson