Posted on 04/04/2005 12:47:46 PM PDT by Rodney King
The Math of . . . Changing Lanes Stay Patient, Stay Alive Is traffic passing you by? Relax. You may be moving faster than you think By Joshua Foer DISCOVER Vol. 26 No. 04 | April 2005
Donald Redelmeier is riding shotgun in my Chrysler Sebring rental car as I cruise down a four-lane stretch of Bayview Avenue in north Toronto. About 30 feet ahead, a white van slows down to make a left turn. Normally, I wouldn’t think twice about swerving around it. Then again, normally I wouldn’t be sitting beside a scientist who is an expert on the risks of changing lanes. “This is a great lane. Just stay in this lane,” Redelmeier says, in his best driving-instructor’s voice, craning his neck to check the side mirror. “I don’t preach absolute abstinence,” he adds, “but I really resist small temptations.”
Redelmeier, a clinical epidemiologist at the University of Toronto, divides his time between treating accident traumas and figuring out what causes them. Car crashes, he points out, will kill roughly the same number of people worldwide this year as malaria: more than a million. In recent years, he and Stanford statistician Robert Tibshirani have conducted a number of studies on the statistical factors that contribute to this epidemic. They’ve shown that using a cell phone while driving poses the same relative risk as driving with a blood-alcohol level at the legal limit. They’ve demonstrated that drivers are about 35 percent less likely than usual to die in an accident in the month after receiving a traffic ticket, and that driving fatalities increase immediately following the Super Bowl—68 percent in the losing team’s state but only 6 percent in the winning team’s state. Redelmeier has an uncanny knack for using simple statistics to turn up unexpected results. A few years ago he discovered that the average Academy Award winner lives four years longer than other actors and that patients admitted to a hospital over the weekend are 28 percent more likely to die than those admitted on weekdays.
In the late 1990s Redelmeier and Tibshirani began to wonder why it is that drivers change lanes so often, especially in congested traffic. This was no idle concern. Of the 42,643 motor-vehicle-related fatalities in the United States last year, 3 percent—1,304—occurred in cars changing lanes or merging. The scientists theorized that some kind of perceptual illusion was fooling drivers into thinking they were in the slow lane more often than they really were.
To test their hypothesis, Redelmeier and Tibshirani built a computer model that simulated two-lane traffic, then populated it with hundreds of virtual Honda Accords. The cars followed a simple set of rules: They accelerated to catch up with traffic and slowed down if the gap between cars grew too small. What the scientists found confirmed their suspicions: Cars in congested traffic spent more time being overtaken by other cars than they did passing them. Both lanes were moving at the same average speed, but it wouldn’t have seemed that way to the drivers.
Slow cars clump together; fast cars spread out. A driver may pass 10 cars all at once, then move into the slow lane and watch 8 cars speed past one by one. He’ll think he’s moving slower than average, but in fact he’s moving faster. “During any trip, there’ll be far fewer moments of pleasure when you’re passing and far more moments of pain when you’re being overtaken,” Redelmeier says. “That imbalance holds for every driver on the roadway.”
To see if real people fall prey to this same illusion, Redelmeier and Tibshirani mounted a video camera in the backseat of a graduate student’s car and sent him into Toronto’s rush-hour traffic. The student kept his radio tuned to traffic reports. Whenever he heard of some congestion, he hightailed it to the scene and took some footage of cars crawling along in the next lane. Later, Redelmeier and Tibshirani went through the film and selected a four-minute clip in which the driver was moving slightly faster than the cars in the other lane. When they showed it to driving students, 70 percent guessed, incorrectly, that the other lane was moving faster, and 65 percent said they’d try to switch into it.
Other perceptual illusions may also conspire to cause lane envy, Redelmeier and Tibshirani say. People tend to glance at the next lane more often when they’re moving slowly, which can make their situation seem worse than it is. Also, since drivers face forward, the cars they pass disappear quickly behind them while those that overtake them remain annoyingly visible. The simplest solution, Redelmeier jokes, is to gloat a bit more over the cars you’ve passed: “When you’re really getting steamed up in congested traffic, spend a little more time looking into your rearview mirror.”
These findings could apply to other situations in which people have to choose between lanes, as in the grocery store and the bank, Redelmeier says. But highways are where it matters most. “Very few people are dying while in line at the grocery store,” he says.
Mathematicians Bryan Dawson and Troy Riggs of Union University in Jackson, Tennessee, have also studied why drivers tend to feel as if they’re stuck in the slow lane. Their research takes a more statistical tack, however, relying heavily on calculus and probability theory. Dawson and Riggs start by assuming that drivers gauge the speed of traffic by watching the cars that immediately surround them. If you’re driving in the slow lane, you will only rarely pass another car, but you’ll see cars streaming by in the passing lane. “This will give you the misimpression that more people are driving fast and fewer people are driving slow,” Riggs says. In fact, the majority of drivers may be plugging along at your pace while only a few hot rods are in the passing lane.
Riggs and Dawson have developed a mathematical theorem for the phenomenon. It shows that even if a driver can accurately estimate the speed of cars around him, he’s still bound to misjudge the average speed on the highway. Drivers going faster than average will exaggerate how slow other traffic is going; those going slower will exaggerate how fast others are going. Riggs and Dawson calculate, for instance, that if cars are averaging 68 miles per hour on a highway and a driver is going 65 mph, he will estimate that the other cars are going 70 mph—an illusion that’s liable to make him want to change lanes.
That might be the end of the matter, were it not for Nick Bostrom, a postdoctoral fellow in philosophy at Oxford University. In a recent issue of Plus, an online mathematics magazine, Bostrom argued that there’s a more straightforward explanation for lane envy: “If you think about what causes a lane to go slowly, it’s often that there are lots of cars crammed into it. If there are lots of cars, that means on average there will be more drivers and more driver time spent in the slow-moving crammed lanes than in the fast-moving lanes.”
Bostrom compares cars to gas molecules: The way to maximize a road’s overall throughput, he argues, would be to increase the “diffusion rate” to the point where all lanes are in equilibrium. If they could do so safely, he concludes, drivers ought to be changing lanes more rather than less. “Appearances are faithful,” Bostrom says. “More often than not, the next lane is actually faster!”
According to a recent study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, men driving on interstates and highways make 12 percent more lane changes than women and almost 40 percent more at speeds between 45 and 55 miles per hour. Men are more than twice as likely to die in car accidents.
Redelmeier concedes Bostrom’s point. But he says that research like his and Tibshirani’s shows “just how fallible our judgment is.” Far better to play it safe, he adds. “The risks are always real, but the benefits are sometimes illusory.”
VERY interesting. Thanks!
Somewhat related story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1377191/posts
Outlaw lane changing, it's a killer!
Have driver one drive only in one lane, or allow 2 lane changes max, and have the other driver change lanes when he felt it would speed his trip.
Well, there's the problem. The roads I travel on are not all populated with Honda Accords.
Not if you are always the fastest driver. Then you only get the pain of being passed when Officer Donutmuncher asks you if you know how fast you were going.
It is interesting. I've been in countless traffic jams when I lived in California. Stop and go traffic is endemic to the area.
I always stay in whatever lane I find myself in when the traffic piles up. As soon as the stop and go starts, I make a mental note of the cars alongside of me.
I stay in my lane. When the backup ends, I generally am no more than three or four cars ahead of or behind the cars I noted when the backup began.
Cars pass, and are passed. The actual time consumed is about the same, regardless. Staying in one lane in slow traffic situation lowers the risk of an accident, it seems to me.
Good reminder. Thanks.
LOL!
15 miles later, it'll probably be no more than a few car lengths ahead of you.
I drive a lot and see it all the time.
"15 miles later, it'll probably be no more than a few car lengths ahead of you.
I drive a lot and see it all the time."
A couple of years of riding only motorcycles in L.A. led me to the following train of thought: You can encounter other vehicles in 3 ways -- crossing, opposing, or overtaking (or being overtaken). Of those three, overtaking is by far the most dangerous.
I drive through downtown Denver every day during rush hour. Denver has the third worst traffic congestion in the nation.
I already know the fastest lanes to any destination in the city. I don't change lanes unless there's an accident or road work.
I seem to inevitably catch up with cars that have passed me within 4 or 5 minutes.
What a blooming idiot! Only a complete moron blocks the driver's view of the rear-view mirror!!! This article gives credence to the stereotype of 'pointy-headed professor'.
Saw a bumper sticker once: LEFT LANE FOR PASSING AND SOCIOPATHS ONLY!
I don't care if it's smarter. It's much more satisfying to make a move.
And back at 55mph how much time difference is that? 5 seconds?
I also drive a lot (50-60K per year) and have found that when driving in cities, it is best to stay in the fast lane almost exclusively. My theory is that the slower (right-hand lanes are close to exit and entry ramps, which cause minor havoc on a lot of drivers.
I have also noticed that if I am bunched up in the fast lane, and there is an opening in the slower lane, quite a few women get into the slow lane, pass everyone to her left, and then get stuck until all of the fast lane traffic plus a few others have passed her.
Another observation: People drive like f***ing idiots within a mile of their homes. I fortunately do most of my driving in rural areas, and I can't tell you how many times I've been passed by a suicide driver, (and I drive 74-77 mph on posted 70 mph roads) only to have him/her (mostly hims) put on the blinker and turn a half a mile or so later.
The real problem are the sickos (often with Kerry bumper stickers) that go slow and then speed up when you try to pass them.
"Has anyone ever heard a really good reason to use the left lane for anything but passing?"
Absolutely....because I can.
20+ years driving in Houston taught me to do whatever, whenever to put myself in the safest position. I call it offensive-defensive driving. If I had to shoot a gap at 90 to put myself in a safer position, no problem. Of course that was in my late 20's, but 700,000 miles and no tickets/wrecks later, I think it's more than luck.
Another thing I picked up in Houston traffic was to aim my mirrors at my blind spots. There comes a time when you don't have time to physically check you blind spot and merge at the same time. It took a while to get comfortable with it, but there is no other way to drive now IMHO. People always freak out when I drive their cars, mangle their mirrors, and never check my blind spot when changing lanes.
CW
Not if you are always the fastest driver. Then you only get the pain of being passed when Officer Donutmuncher asks you if you know how fast you were going.
Yes. Here are two: Hwy 5 in CA is a good example, which is a high-speed, 2 lanes-each-direction freeway. Because the slow lane carries massively more truck traffic (as it should) the slow lane is quite a bit more torn up and worn in various ways than the fast lane. Where the pavement is concrete and thus laid down in equal-length blocks, the weight and pasage of all those truck tires tends to impose harmonically-spaced irregularities in the pavement. All this results in a bumpy ride which cannot help but wear your car's suspension. And it will do so for 3 hours = ~~~175 miles if you let it. So I tend to travel in the fast lane nearly all the time, and pretty fast (>80 mph). If anyone comes up behind me, I immediately change lanes and let them thru.
Another reason is that if you do not move past slower-moving trucks in a hurry, two trucks whose speed differential is 1/3rd mile per hour will aggregate, and one passing the other can take 5 miles. This can also happen with clusters of trucks (CONVOY!!!) And if one or more of those trucks is carrying gravel, you can be stuck behind a truck that potentially sheds stones or whatever else for quite a while. Not desirable in my book.
Frankly, I consider it much more dangerous to remain 3 feet away from another vehicle going 65 mph for 17 miles than to clearly move by traffic going slower than you wish to go. It all works GREAT if the folks who wish to go slow just let the faster ones go by. Eg; "Lead, follow, or get out of the way".
I lanesplit a few times after moving to New Hampshire from California, and after a few dirty looks and a few inidignant shouts from nearby cars, I looked up the law - no lanesplitting allowed out here.
I've remarked on that kind of driver before, and my impression is that kind of bad driver wants to punish you for not going the requisite ten miles over the limit like he or she does. So his his or her stupid and dangerous stunt of passing you only to turn in front of you a very short distance later is meant to be "I'll show you" kind of demonstration. I would bet that you if you could see that driver's face as they are turning, their face is probably deep red, and invective is coming out of their mouth directed at you. The driver obviously feels like they proved something. They did...they proved that he or she is a moron. That kind of bad driving happens to me, and I'm sure many other drivers, more times than should be imagined. (By the way, I enjoy making speeders slow down)
If we took folks' licenses away for minor stuff, instead of giving them 10 chances to screw up, we'd solve this whole driving thing in a matter of months. People love their cars. DRIVING IS A PRIVILEGE, PEOPLE.
What is lane-splitting? Is that the practice of straddling the lane divider marker, so that you're really taking up two lanes?
Exactly. Three great driving goals: Get out of developing bad situations. Don't impede the flow of traffic. And don't let the other drivers control your options.
When you're one of several drivers who must take immediate action to avoid an accident, you're in deep doodoo!
Back when I was doing the Connecticut-New Jersey commute, I passed a heck of a lot more cars than I got passed by, but I was almost never the fastest driver on the road. That honor usually went to some drag test pilot in a Mercedes (or insane cyclist) who saw no problem with 90+ cruise speeds or passing at 100+. I would cruise at 70-75 and pass at speeds up to 85. It wasn't really dangerous since normal cruise speeds on those roads are 65-70 anyway, passing at 80+ is not uncommon, and they were largely 3- and 4-lane modern roads. I'd pass a boatload of slower cars, settle into the middle lane, and get passed by a handful of folks I liked to refer to as "ticket decoys" - the folks who would be first to get pulled over by any cop that happened to be on the road.
Then again, that's wide-open-highway driving, and not the same as a congested road of limited breadth.
I'd compare the passing issue to "stock chasing":
If you invest in cmpanies which have already experience stock price growth, you will do MORE poorly than someone who stays in the stocks he purchased immediately.
Likewise, traffic lanes seem to take moving faster. By the time you switch to the faster-moving lane, it is probably ready to take a turn moving slower. The grass really IS always greener on the other side.
There are exceptions:
When driving along a highway that is picking up traffic at interchanges, stay to the left lane, of course.
Oddly, when there is road work, it seems to go fastesr to stay in the lane the road work will be coming up in, merging moderately late. I suspect this is because the early mergers are the careful ones who maximize space between cars when merging. (The tighter the cars are packed, the more can pass a given point, so the faster the line will move.) On the other hand, don't be an ***hole and cut around other cards, into the merge-cleared lane.
I have seen accidents that could have been prevented if the drivers had looked ahead and kept more distance.
You are only as safe as the least safe driver around you, so a little distance does make a difference!
lane splitting (lane-sharing) is the practice of motorcyclists riding between lanes of traffic. On average there is a 10ft gap between cars in one lane to the cars in the next lane.
In California it is not against the law to ride a motorcycle between the lanes of traffic. In some states there are specific laws against this.
I know several CHP bike cops, and they have all said, as long as you are doing it responsibly (10-15mph faster than traffic) they will let you ride.
I'd compare the passing issue to "stock chasing":
-----
Funny you should say that, I compare good asset allocation to having a car in each lane of traffic. Regardless of traffic congestion, one of them is moving.
Can't we all just swerve along?
Why is it that a semi-truck driver doing 61 MPH feels compelled to pass another semi-truck doing 60 MPH? The passing truck stays at 61 during his pass... which forces everyone close behind in the fast lane to slow to 61 also?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.