Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berger deal suggests darker plot
worldnetdaily.com ^ | Posted: April 5, 2005 | jack cashill

Posted on 04/05/2005 2:16:14 PM PDT by ovrtaxt

On Thursday, March 31, just hours after Terri Schiavo died, the Justice Department announced that former Clinton national security adviser, Sandy Berger, was about to get his wrist slapped.

Among the "mistakes" that triggered the slap was Berger's hand-shredding of several critical documents with a pair of scissors. Another "mistake" that Berger acknowledged was lying to all and everyone about what he had done when first questioned. He now admits the destruction of these documents was "not inadvertent."

With both Schiavo dead and the pope dying, the media were free to downplay the Berger story, which they eagerly did. They provided almost no answers and asked few questions. The Washington Post, however, did manage to pose a conundrum, "It remains unclear," asked the Post, "why [Berger] destroyed three versions of a document, but left two other versions intact."

In an earlier article on Berger, I suggested an answer to this question – the president's handwritten notes on a document make one version entirely more dangerous than an identical document without those notes. My source for this process was Col. Buzz Patterson, author of "Dereliction of Duty."

Patterson carried the "nuclear football" for the president during the fateful summer of 1996 and as such had almost total access. One morning that Patterson identifies only as "late-summer" 1996, he was returning a daily intelligence update to the National Security Council when he noticed the heading "Operation Bojinka." As Patterson relates, "I keyed on a reference to a plot to use commercial airliners as weapons." As a pilot, he had a keen interest in the same.

In the way of an omen, Islamic terrorist Ramzi Yousef was on trial in New York on the day of July 17, 1996, for his role in Operation Bojinka (Serbo-Croatian for "loud bang"). The publicly known part of this plot was Yousef's plan to blow up 11 American airliners over the Pacific. A lesser-known element of Bojinka, the one Patterson stumbled upon, was the plan to use planes as flying bombs. That same summer, courtesy of an FBI informant in Yousef's New York jail, Yousef was actively communicating with the terrorist world. Among his correspondents was his uncle, Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, the mastermind of 9-11.

Patterson was not in position to connect Bojinka and TWA Flight 800. The knowledge of what happened the night of July 17, 1996, had been kept remarkably tight. What Patterson did learn from seeing the president's hand-annotated response to this intelligence report is that Clinton had read it carefully.

"I can state for a fact that this information was circulated within the U.S. intelligence community," Patterson writes, "and that in late 1996 the president was aware of it." That Clinton was reviewing this information in the immediate aftermath of TWA Flight 800's demise suggests more than mere coincidence: The FBI had received these documents from the Philippine police 18 months earlier.

Berger now says that the documents he shredded had to do with an after-action review written by Richard Clarke and dealing with various terrorist threats at the time of the millennium. A little skepticism is in order here. Could these documents possibly have been worth risking one's career over? I don't think so.

The Bush Justice Department has given Berger a pass in the form of a $10,000 fine and a meaningless three-year suspension of his security clearance. The probe dies with the fine.

There is one likely reason why the Bush administration cooperated in the suppression of this story. Revealing it might have dangerously destabilized the government. The TWA Flight 800-9/11 thread is among the very few revelations that has the potential to do just that.


If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.


Read "Terror cover-up in Texas City?"


Purchase "Mega Fix: The Dazzling Political Deceit That Led to 9-11" now!

About Mega Fix: In this stunning, surprisingly entertaining, 90-minute DVD video documentary, Emmy-award-winning filmmaker Jack Cashill traces the roots of Sept. 11 to the perfect storm of disinformation that surrounded the Clintons' desperate drive for the White House in the years 1995-1996.

Cashill leads the viewer from Oklahoma City to Dubrovnik, where Ron Brown's plane crashed, to the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia to the destruction of TWA Flight 800 off Long Island to the Olympic Park bombing.

As Cashill proves beyond dispute in this DVD, these are not multiple conspiracies, but all part of one major political fix, the mother of all fixes ... the Mega Fix.

Extra special offer: As a valuable added bonus, purchasing "Mega Fix" from WND's online store also qualifies you to receive – FREE – three power-packed issues of WND's acclaimed print magazine, Whistleblower. Watch for the FREE offer during checkout!


To arrange a showing in your city, please send an e-mail to Jack Cashill.


Related columns:

MEGA FIX: Top FBI lawyer helped destroy TWA Flight 800

MEGA FIX PREVIEW series:

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 1, The Oklahoma City bombing

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 2, The Oklahoma City aftermath

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 3, The assassination of Ron Brown

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 4, Clinton blocked truth about murdered U.S. troops

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 5, TWA Flight 800: Attacked, destroyed, covered-up

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 6, Clinton covered up 1996 Atlanta Olympic bombings

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 7, How Clinton's team hid Flight 800 attack

'MEGA FIX' PREVIEW: PART 8, How 9-11 commission covered up mass murder


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: bergergate; cashill; conspiracy; coverup; jaynadavis; jbs; okc; okcbombing; whitewash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 04/05/2005 2:16:19 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy; Cooter; eyespysomething; B4Ranch; Alamo-Girl; Triple; MJY1288; potlatch; Shermy; ...
OKC-911 CONNECTION ALERT. Please let me know by freepmail if you want to be put on or taken off this list. Thanks.
2 posted on 04/05/2005 2:17:34 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (McClellan: Do away with daily press briefings! Come straight to the New Media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

" the president's handwritten notes on a document make one version entirely more dangerous than an identical document without those notes."

Exactly. I agree


3 posted on 04/05/2005 2:20:23 PM PDT by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Berger deal suggests darker plot

=======

Is that a racist comment ???


4 posted on 04/05/2005 2:22:55 PM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!! -- Impeach Greer !!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeekDejure

Yeah, Stormfront propaganda. </wise guy comment>


5 posted on 04/05/2005 2:23:52 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (McClellan: Do away with daily press briefings! Come straight to the New Media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Please add me to your ping list.

What about the attack at the El Al (?) gate at LAX? Before the smell of gunpowder left the air it was alleged by the feds that it was not a case of terrorism. I think we know better now.

6 posted on 04/05/2005 2:26:47 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

What's the point of Bush helping Clinton cover his tracks? Did he make a deal with the Clintons--they won't have him Arkancided and he won't do anything that would jeopardize Hillary's run in 2008?


7 posted on 04/05/2005 2:27:27 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Yeah, Stormfront propaganda. </wise guy comment>

=======

Is there such a thing as Stormrear truth? </curious guy question>




8 posted on 04/05/2005 2:28:25 PM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!! -- Impeach Greer !!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

ping


9 posted on 04/05/2005 2:29:20 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Does my American flag offend you? Dial 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Mo1
Patterson was not in position to connect Bojinka and TWA Flight 800. The knowledge of what happened the night of July 17, 1996, had been kept remarkably tight. What Patterson did learn from seeing the president's hand-annotated response to this intelligence report is that Clinton had read it carefully

ping

10 posted on 04/05/2005 2:32:07 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Does my American flag offend you? Dial 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

BTTT


11 posted on 04/05/2005 2:32:31 PM PDT by auboy (The Grim Reaper wears a black robe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

What's the point of Bush helping Clinton cover his tracks? Did he make a deal with the Clintons--they won't have him Arkancided and he won't do anything that would jeopardize Hillary's run in 2008?
=====
While that may be a bit of a stretch, who knows for sure? Bush sure has been openly friendly to Billy lately, especially letting him accompany them to the Pope's funeral...and Berger should be hanging from a tree, but he gets sent to his room, and no dessert.

Why am I getting more disappointed in the credibility and effectiveness of our Washington government almost on a DAILY BASIS ???


12 posted on 04/05/2005 2:32:40 PM PDT by EagleUSA (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt; OXENinFLA
I swear that I remember hearing one very brief TV report in the late 90's about an Islamist plot to fly planes into buildings. I remember it because I remember the visceral pull-back reaction I had to the mental image it created.

Of course, nobody took it seriously...

Ping and bump

13 posted on 04/05/2005 2:36:59 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Does my American flag offend you? Dial 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

"" the president's handwritten notes on a document make one version entirely more dangerous than an identical document without those notes.""

Oh, please. Why would the president's comments be on a draft document? Berger's probably protecting his own legacy.


14 posted on 04/05/2005 2:38:55 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast

You are officially pinglisted.


15 posted on 04/05/2005 2:40:16 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (McClellan: Do away with daily press briefings! Come straight to the New Media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Why am I getting more disappointed in the credibility and effectiveness of our Washington government almost on a DAILY BASIS ???

You're not alone...

16 posted on 04/05/2005 2:41:39 PM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Of course, nobody took it seriously...

Especially Clinton


17 posted on 04/05/2005 2:43:03 PM PDT by chainsaw (We are going to take things away from you for the common good. - H. Clinton June of 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I don't see what the problem is. Little Sandy simply forgot what his mommy taught him: "Never run with scissors, son. You might accidently shred documents with them, or, you might stab yourself in the back with them some day..."


18 posted on 04/05/2005 2:43:43 PM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Oh, please. Why would the president's comments be on a draft document? Berger's probably protecting his own legacy.

"It remains unclear," asked the Post, "why [Berger] destroyed three versions of a document, but left two other versions intact."

In an earlier article on Berger, I suggested an answer to this question – the president's handwritten notes on a document make one version entirely more dangerous than an identical document without those notes. My source for this process was Col. Buzz Patterson, author of "Dereliction of Duty."

--So you think Patterson's claim is suspect? Why?

19 posted on 04/05/2005 2:44:57 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (McClellan: Do away with daily press briefings! Come straight to the New Media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Czar
Why am I getting more disappointed in the credibility and effectiveness of our Washington government almost on a DAILY BASIS ???
You're not alone...
I'll make it three - something has changed, President Bush does know when to cut a deal but this smells like Camembert
20 posted on 04/05/2005 2:45:46 PM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson