Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Posting Style Book - format for replying (We seem to be slipping)
Me, Myself and BJungNan | April 9, 2005 | BJungNan

Posted on 04/09/2005 11:51:09 AM PDT by BJungNan

Lately there seems to be some slippage of what has been for years the common style for replying to posts. In the interest of FR Stylebook maintenance, here is what has been proper style on replying to comments in a thread.

The common form for replies is as follows:

1. Quote the person you are replying to with italics (if you are replying to someone specifically and what they said).
2. Seperate with a paragraph mark.
3. Show your reply in regular text

Example:
Even after five years (or so) of reading FR, I still find myself amazed at the quality of discussion and the wealth of information, especially posts from the many experts that are members of FR. Who would have thought we would have experts in typefonts of all things (to Dan Rather's chagrin).

You sure have that right BJungNan. Jim and FR are the greatest!

---

Placing the comments of the person you are replying to in quote marks or in Bold may get the job done, but really it is not common style. At least not to my FR eyes. Those using quotes perhaps don't know html but it is really easy. FR is where many people learned html. Somewhere on here is an html sandbox (perhaps someone can offer up that link).



TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: biggapingpiehole; busybody; faq; fontpolice; frstyle; htmlgestapo; htmlsandbox; missmaners; newbie; stylebook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-329 next last
To: Buddy B

I feel like I'm back at work with IBM Corporation in the 80s, learning the old GML tags.


181 posted on 04/09/2005 2:46:52 PM PDT by i_dont_chat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
>>Placing the original passage being replied to in italics requires the poster to use HTLM throughout the entire post

>Yes, but there is one thing FReepers are not and that is they are not lazy.

Nor are they foolish. Wasted effort, with no benefit, is wasted effort, period.
182 posted on 04/09/2005 2:49:24 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Misty Memory

I know how to do HTML.

I just object to the wasted effort with no beefit.


183 posted on 04/09/2005 2:50:37 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Gore TV hasn't started transmitting. That will happen in August.


184 posted on 04/09/2005 2:52:02 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Stupidity is also a gift of God, but one mustn't misuse it" - Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308
New "House Rule", when you go to the immigration thread introduce yourself with:

¿Hola cómo es usted? ¿Me puede dirigir usted a la más cercana oficina de la Seguridad social? Tengo todo el papeleo inclusive un permiso de conducir y tarjeta verde. Trabajará para pequeño o ningún dinero. Gracias mi amigo para contestar en el avance.

185 posted on 04/09/2005 2:59:07 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Stupidity is also a gift of God, but one mustn't misuse it" - Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
I would like to see something that would not require HTML for the entire reply because it is just too time consuming.

I never understood the rationale for making 'any' HTML tag turn off auto-formatting rather than having auto paragraph formatting be controlled by the absense of [br] or [p] tags, auto-URL formatting triggered by the absense of [a] tags, and auto-& conversion triggered by the absense of valid character entities.

Actually, I wish there were a pseudo-tag that could be used to automatically convert single line breaks to [br] and double line breaks to [p] within a specified region (somewhat like [pre], but without the other implications thereof). Ideally, this tag would have one flavor for [p] tags only (ignoring single line breaks), and one for both [p] and [br].

186 posted on 04/09/2005 2:59:47 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Whatever happened to scrolling text?


187 posted on 04/09/2005 3:01:39 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Mark to read what has to be a classic funny thread.


188 posted on 04/09/2005 3:01:50 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Friend of the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan; jimrob

I figure it this way...

If Jimrob wants us to set off the posts we are replying to in a separate style, he would have given us a separate, box already italicized for us to copy it into....

He wouldnt expect us to wrestle with HTML....right Jim??


189 posted on 04/09/2005 3:02:33 PM PDT by mlmr (The Culture of Death will get a lot more deadly before it's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
One of Bill Gate's greatest gifts to the online world was making Internet Explorer ignore the <blink> tag.
190 posted on 04/09/2005 3:16:09 PM PDT by evilC ([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Font Wars Alert
Normal service will now resume ...
191 posted on 04/09/2005 3:20:41 PM PDT by evilC ([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlmr
He wouldnt expect us to wrestle with HTML....right Jim??

He is trying to teach you...and you are one darn difficult student LOL

192 posted on 04/09/2005 3:20:52 PM PDT by BJungNan (gogov.com - Make it your home page. I did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: WSGilcrest

Sombody did some good work changing the pudgy kid into a pudgy Michael More. I love it. Great job!


193 posted on 04/09/2005 3:22:01 PM PDT by BJungNan (gogov.com - Make it your home page. I did!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Do you remember the older version of FR, where style bombs (unclosed tags or misused style elements) could cause havoc?


194 posted on 04/09/2005 3:23:59 PM PDT by evilC ([573]Tag Server Error, Tag not found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlmr
Basic HTML Tip Tutorial - Tips n Tags For Forum - Message Boards - Guestbooks
195 posted on 04/09/2005 3:25:44 PM PDT by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I know how to do HTML.

I posted the tags for the benefit of those who may not know HTML. I used your post as the springboard. No offense intended.

I just object to the wasted effort with no be[n]efit.

Ahh, but there is a benefit. Those who have been here a while may or may not know the little numbers under each post link back to the post you're commenting on. Someone new to the forum wouldn't necessarily know that and would therefore have no idea what your comment relates to or how to find it.

196 posted on 04/09/2005 3:26:48 PM PDT by Misty Memory (Making a mental note.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: bert

May I also suggest that the person who posts differentiate his/her reply between
- the first person who posted
- the author of the material that the first person posted.

For example, Travis posts an article by Ward Churchill. Now, Jeff Head responds to the post. Here are two possible responses:

- Travis, thanks for this post. I agree, Mr. Churchill has some problems.

- Ward Churchill, what is your problem?

Clearly identifying the person being addressed will prevent misunderstanding.


197 posted on 04/09/2005 3:31:15 PM PDT by rudy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: evilC
Do you remember the older version of FR, where style bombs (unclosed tags or misused style elements) could cause havoc?

Indeed I do. Too bad that JR has totally disabled style properties, though. Some of them allowed a level of precision in text formatting that wasn't available via any other means. It was pretty cool being able to use pitures as table backgrounds and use styles to precisely place labeling text. My personal favorite was a picture of all sorts of bags that had big "GUN" labels on the side; using nothing but HTML, I changed all the labels to say "STEAL ME".

198 posted on 04/09/2005 3:33:00 PM PDT by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
That was fun when someone would set off the whole rest of a thread in bold until someone switched it off.

I remember one FReeper dude with vision problems who would periodically set a whole thread to some humongous font size rather than just adjust his own personal settings.

199 posted on 04/09/2005 3:33:35 PM PDT by TheRightGuy (ERROR CODE 018974523: Random Tagline Compiler Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
Pookie18, I thought you were my spell checker - Definately saved me on a few toons :)

Definitely did :-(

200 posted on 04/09/2005 3:40:40 PM PDT by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-329 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson