Skip to comments.
Jennings' illness changes 'World'
Newsday ^
| April 10, 2005
| VERNE GAY
Posted on 04/10/2005 6:30:37 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
It is the hardest, cruelest question in television right now, and the one that no one seems willing to ask for the obvious reasons. But it hangs in midair nonetheless - obvious, intrusive, and uncomfortable: Who will replace Peter Jennings?
The anchor of ABC News' flagship broadcast last week announced that he has lung cancer and will occasionally miss the program as he undergoes chemotherapy starting this week. Nevertheless, Jennings' illness has forced the question that has been forestalled for years. Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abcnews; jennings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-64 next last
To: COUNTrecount
I'll bet ABC tries to entice Aaron Brown to come back from CNN.
2
posted on
04/10/2005 6:33:28 AM PDT
by
leadpenny
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?another liberal reader.
The rest is cornpone.
3
posted on
04/10/2005 6:33:36 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?Haven't lost sleep over it myself.
To: COUNTrecount
Lung cancer is a terrible tragedy but how ironic that we have lost the last of the all time leftist MSM talking heads.
Rather, Jennings, and Brockaw each tried to outdo each other toeing the leftist party line.
5
posted on
04/10/2005 6:34:31 AM PDT
by
spanalot
To: COUNTrecount
Jennings, Brokaw, Rather..blah, blah, blah....
He (they) will get replaced by more deceivers who will use their notoriety and air time to spew their leftist agenda and lies/omissions as they have for decades...the only good thing about them leaving is that the overall power of the MSM is diminishing. I hope their successors never reach the height of power they have.
6
posted on
04/10/2005 6:40:36 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: COUNTrecount
The real question is why should I care?
7
posted on
04/10/2005 6:41:03 AM PDT
by
dts32041
(We have instituted our own set of Nuremberg laws.)
To: COUNTrecount
If they can dig up Scheiffer, why not Koppel for the World News
8
posted on
04/10/2005 6:41:55 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
To: COUNTrecount
"... changes the world"?
LOL!
I know of many, including myself, that haven't watched him in years!
9
posted on
04/10/2005 6:42:16 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: COUNTrecount
The left is soooo pretentious.
Hope they don't put HIM on a feeding tube.
Could you imagine the uproar if someone tried to pull that tube?
10
posted on
04/10/2005 6:43:43 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: COUNTrecount
The person who does replace him should realize that they will see the end of tv network news reporting. The big three are sliding into irrelevance and their sponsors know this.
To: COUNTrecount
These people are so conceited!
Jennings' illness changes the world as much as removing a bucket of water changes an ocean. As far as I'm concerned, the bucket is more useful than Mr. Jennings and the water is worth more.
And that goes for the rest of the talking heads. The media is not the message.
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?
Tho a shame he has to endure this disease, He wasn't the greatest anchor, and changing the world....I think not. Replacements? They come a $9 million a dozen.
13
posted on
04/10/2005 6:52:23 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: COUNTrecount
exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history? One of the great anchors? lol. Peter Jennings s*cks. He is everything you do not want in an anchor (biased, annoying, totally affected, ill at ease, injects himself into the story, distracting, egotistical...)As far as a replacement, how about a canned ham?
To: COUNTrecount
Kent Brockman could replace that
cork-soaker Jennings in a heartbeat!
15
posted on
04/10/2005 6:54:29 AM PDT
by
Tuba Guy
(' I has spoken !! ')
To: COUNTrecount
My vote goes to Mickey. I'd probably would give the verbiage coming out of Mickey's mouth more weight than PJ's'.
I do wish Peter Jennings the best of luck with his illness though. It is a difficult time for him and his family.
16
posted on
04/10/2005 6:55:33 AM PDT
by
Chgogal
To: COUNTrecount
"Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?"In my wildest dreams: Mark Levine.
To: nmh
"Hope they don't put HIM on a feeding tube."
It does not do much good to be ON a feeding tube, better to have a feeding tube surgically implanted IN you.
18
posted on
04/10/2005 6:57:15 AM PDT
by
Mark was here
(My tag line was about to be censored.)
To: N. Beaujon
As far as a replacement, how about a canned ham? Just the can would be closer to parity.
PJ, have a nice trip...
19
posted on
04/10/2005 6:57:48 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: DakotaGator
I think they meant World News Tonight, not the actual world....
20
posted on
04/10/2005 6:58:00 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
To: leadpenny
I'll bet ABC tries to entice Aaron Brown to come back from CNN.Woo hoo, Mr. Excitement.
To: MikeinIraq
I think that's what they mean.
22
posted on
04/10/2005 6:59:43 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: Dallas59
yeah that seems a reach, even for one of the MSM....
23
posted on
04/10/2005 7:01:03 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
To: MikeinIraq
After listening to Jennings inform the terrorists how to
shot down American helicopters (and they did), they must
have meant ".. the terrorist world"
24
posted on
04/10/2005 7:01:54 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us")
To: leadpenny
Maybe they should try Michael Savage.
25
posted on
04/10/2005 7:02:01 AM PDT
by
rudyudy
To: Diogenesis
could be....but I doubt it....I think they meant his show title....its just poorly written....
26
posted on
04/10/2005 7:02:47 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
To: COUNTrecount
Slick Willie is available (and slightly more conservative than Jennings)
To: OldFriend
You ask,
"If they can dig up Scheiffer, why not Koppel for the World News?" and I applaud your common sense. It's just too coincidental that Koppel announces he's leaving NIGHTLINE in the same weekly news cycle Jennings announces his disease. We can be sure the honchos at ABCNews knew long before Jennings went public.
28
posted on
04/10/2005 7:03:25 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
(@)
To: rudyudy
Maybe they should try Michael Savage. (wearing my flame retardant suit) I'd like to see Dennis Miller. If the libs can exhalt Jon Stewart to lofty heights, I want Dennis Miller. Never going to happen of course.
29
posted on
04/10/2005 7:15:46 AM PDT
by
infidel29
("It is only the warlike power of a civilized people that can give peace to the world."- T. Roosevelt)
To: COUNTrecount
30
posted on
04/10/2005 7:20:05 AM PDT
by
traumer
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history? Brit Hume is leaving TV?
31
posted on
04/10/2005 7:30:55 AM PDT
by
CPOSharky
(You are born cold, wet, and hungry. Things get worse, then you die.)
To: COUNTrecount
How about a text to voice synthesizer like the National Weather Service uses for their radio broadcasts. A fitting way to read propaganda.
32
posted on
04/10/2005 7:35:02 AM PDT
by
Sterlis
To: COUNTrecount
occasionally miss the program?....what a polite airy way of saying....he's going to miss life.
33
posted on
04/10/2005 7:36:14 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: COUNTrecount
34
posted on
04/10/2005 7:40:17 AM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(If arrogance was beauty, New England women would be supermodels!)
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?
Something other than a "great anchor." Those days are done.
To: nmh
Headline reads Changes 'World' not 'the' world--Jennings show was called World News I believe.
To: OldFriend
To: COUNTrecount
To: COUNTrecount
Just exactly who will replace one of the great anchors in TV history?How can they say that with a straight face? How few newsreaders have their been for the networks "in TV history"?
That's like Clinton standing next to W and Bush I and saying, "I'm one of the best presidents in this room!" Technically it's true, but it's still laughable.
39
posted on
04/10/2005 8:09:10 AM PDT
by
Future Snake Eater
(The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike Phil, this plan just might work.)
To: US_MilitaryRules
To: COUNTrecount
41
posted on
04/10/2005 8:15:49 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: Liberator
In my wildest dreams: Mark Levine.Levy..Levine...what's the difference...
IMHO, This is the guy who would bring in far more market share and finally bring the right perspective to world news...
42
posted on
04/10/2005 8:20:15 AM PDT
by
Cvengr
(<;^))
To: COUNTrecount
Mikhail Gorbachev has the left-wing credentials for the job.
43
posted on
04/10/2005 8:23:44 AM PDT
by
Mogollon
To: Cvengr
I agree...Eugene Levy will do......
44
posted on
04/10/2005 8:36:41 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: Route101
Hope I didn't offend anybody,..Mark Levine is probably an excellant choice.
Network anchorman has to be one of the most powerful positions in society, yet it's remarkably untouchable.
Consider the large number of high school and college kids who can easily be influenced by that type of image to seek that type of position for their career, yet the number of available positions dwarves almost any other profession. One would think this would favor more competition for the positions, yet it appears the incredible lack of turnover more directly implies a complete lack of competition.
45
posted on
04/10/2005 8:46:43 AM PDT
by
Cvengr
(<;^))
To: Mrs Mark
"Hope they don't put HIM on a feeding tube."It does not do much good to be ON a feeding tube, better to have a feeding tube surgically implanted IN you.
I guarantee you I could "surgically implant" a feeding tube in that jerk in such a way that he'd be ON it every time he sat down.
(Actually, I do hope things turn out OK for him.)
46
posted on
04/10/2005 8:54:44 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
To: Cvengr
Point is....ABC news anchor has become pointless....
47
posted on
04/10/2005 8:55:25 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: COUNTrecount
I wish people would read the articles before they comment.
"World" refers to "World News Tonight" the show, not the planet. Hence the quotes around the world in the Newsday title. And yes, since the star of the show, Jennings is working on dodging the Grim Reaper the show will have to change.
To: foreshadowed at waco
"Headline reads Changes 'World' not 'the' world--Jennings show was called World News I believe."
See how little attention I pay to him.
I think you're right it is called World News Tonight. I'm not going to check it though. I simply don't care.
49
posted on
04/10/2005 9:09:42 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Mrs Mark
"It does not do much good to be ON a feeding tube, better to have a feeding tube surgically implanted IN you."
OKay, put one IN him and then try to remove it. You'll hear all the liberals screaming bloody murder.
50
posted on
04/10/2005 9:10:55 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson