posted on 04/12/2005 11:38:12 AM PDT
The courts are supposed to consider the "best interests" of the minor child. Should be interesting to see what they say.
posted on 04/12/2005 11:39:22 AM PDT
Hmm, dealing with a Virginia Court ruling in a custodial dispute between parents who are residents of Maryland and Florida.. oy, my head hurts.
If this kid was a girl he'd be old enough to get himself an abortion...he ought to be old enough to say whether he wants to live with two men who shag each other, or not.
posted on 04/12/2005 11:45:50 AM PDT
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
No one in their right mind would give custody of a child to two men named "Ulf" and "Blaise".
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
More on the custody case of the husband and wife who divorced, "out" husband got custody, then his homosexual "partner" was court ordered to move out.
There is a lot about this case which is not apparent.
One thing that IS apparent is that the 2003 SCOTUS decision protecting sodomy was very, very bad. Not only was it very bad, but is will continue to have very bad effects. And why in **** can't states decide whether they want to prosecute sodomy as a crime or not?
Let DirtyHarryY2K and me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
posted on 04/14/2005 1:04:59 AM PDT
by little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
WHY is Lambda Legal allowed to even enter a courtroom, or even exist for that matter!! The claim rights for man-boy love! No wonder they want to have the kid with his father!!
posted on 04/14/2005 2:45:50 PM PDT
(Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson