Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

60 Years Ago This Week....
The History Channel? | 13 April 2005 | Yasotay

Posted on 04/13/2005 6:24:31 PM PDT by Yasotay

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last
To: dvwjr
Mmmm ~ you are projecting the belief current from 1949 through 1989 backwards to 1945.

http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=nd02norris provides a listing of nuclear weapons in stockpiles since their first public development in 1945.

To wit:

Global nuclear stockpiles, 1945-2002

Year U.S. Russia U.K. France China Total
1945 6         6
1946 11         11
1947 32         32
1948 110         110
1949 235 1       236
1950 369 5       374
1951 640 25       665
1952 1,005 50       1,055
1953 1,436 120 1     1,557
1954 2,063 150 5     2,218
1955 3,057 200 10     3,267
1956 4,618 426 15     5,059
1957 6,444 660 20     7,124
1958 9,822 869 22     10,713
1959 15,468 1,060 25     16,553
1960 20,434 1,605 30     22,069
1961 24,111 2,471 50     26,632
1962 27,297 3,322 205     30,824
1963 29,249 4,238 280     33,767
1964 30,751 5,221 310 4 1 36,287
1965 31,642 6,129 310 32 5 38,118
1966 31,700 7,089 270 36 20 39,115
1967 30,893 8,339 270 36 25 39,563
1968 28,884 9,399 280 36 35 38,634
1969 26,910 10,538 308 36 50 37,842
1970 26,119 11,643 280 36 75 38,153
1971 26,365 13,092 220 45 100 39,822
1972 27,296 14,478 220 70 130 42,194
1973 28,335 15,915 275 116 150 44,791
1974 28,170 17,385 325 145 170 46,195
1975 27,052 19,055 350 188 185 46,830
1976 25,956 21,205 350 212 190 47,913
1977 25,099 23,044 350 228 200 48,920
1978 24,243 25,393 350 235 220 50,441
1979 24,107 27,935 350 235 235 52,862
1980 23,764 30,062 350 250 280 54,706
1981 23,031 32,049 350 274 330 56,034
1982 22,937 33,952 335 274 360 57,858
1983 23,154 35,804 320 279 380 59,937
1984 23,228 37,431 270 280 415 61,624
1985 23,135 39,197 300 360 425 63,417
1986 23,254 40,723 300 355 425 65,057
1987 23,490 38,859 300 420 415 63,484
1988 23,077 37,333 300 410 430 61,550
1989 22,174 35,805 300 410 435 59,124
1990 21,211 33,417 300 505 430 55,863
1991 18,306 28,595 300 540 435 48,176
1992 13,731 25,155 300 540 435 40,161
1993 11,536 22,101 300 525 435 34,897
1994 11,012 18,399 250 510 400 30,571
1995 10,953 14,978 300 500 400 27,131
1996 10,886 12,085 300 450 400 24,121
1997 10,829 11,264 260 450 400 23,203
1998 10,763 10,764 260 450 400 22,637
1999 10,698 10,451 185 450 400 22,184
2000 10,615 10,201 185 470 400 21,871
2001 10,491 9,126 200 350 400 20,567
2002 10,600 8,600 200 350 400 20,150
 

 

Seems pretty clear to me that the US build-up was such that nukes were not our "first line of defense" until 1959 at the earliest.

It's not just my imagination that tells me that in 1945 we did not have a major nuclear warhead production line ready. We didn't have it in 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949 and 1950. It's 1951/52 when production was ramped up to nearly 400 per year.

USSR was a mighty big country ~ it would take a whale of a lot of nukes to take them out. There simply were not enough of them back in the immediate post war period.

181 posted on 04/15/2005 2:39:35 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: null and void

If you ever see him again and you talk about the subject, you should remind him that he is lucky that we let him live.


182 posted on 04/15/2005 3:32:00 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay

I doubt I ever will. But if I do I will...


183 posted on 04/15/2005 3:39:04 PM PDT by null and void (RFID/0110 0110 0110 - It's all in the wristâ„¢...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I thought that was common knowledge!

Maybe it is, but I sure did not know about Manchuria, but it makes sense.

184 posted on 04/15/2005 4:11:00 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
The problem is everybody keeps their eye on the heavy water plant in Korea. They should have, instead, kept their eye on the yellow-cake processing operation in Manchuria.

That's also the site where most of their atomic scientists were located.

Although today we think of Japan as an highly industrialized nation, back before WWII Japan's main islands were kept fairly free of heavy and polluting industries ~ those went to the colonies!

Their scientists may have been somewhat in advance of our own since the way they handled their R&D in this field took due consideration of radiation problems. In contrast, we started up the first fissionable pile at Soldier Field in roughly the middle of America's second largest city.

185 posted on 04/15/2005 5:38:24 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
BTW, as a West Pointer and a fan of Patton you are correct about Zhukov.

It was clear that allot of Japanese heavy industry went to Korea. I have not studied enough of Japanese industry in China to comment accurately.

Luckily for the U.S. the Manhattan team was able overtake the Japanese (even though they thought the Germans were the real threat)

186 posted on 04/15/2005 8:44:03 PM PDT by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson